Went from a right wing fascist state

went from a right wing fascist state

To a left wing communist state

Failed within 30 years

all fascist states fell within 30 years too

spain didn't

Singapore seems to be doing quite well.

It's true that fascism is superior to communism, but a communist state would thrive as well if the people in it were white. The reason South Africa fell apart is that it's run by niggers.

Most blacks are stone age hunter-gatherers who think stuff just appears out of nowhere OP

1. Singapore is a single city that's rich because it's a tax haven that's used to bypass western sanctions/tariffs on other countries. Similarly to every other micronation in existance.
2. How is Singapore, the premier multicultural international trading hub of the world at all similar to fascism which is notably autarkic and assimilationist?

nta but he considers it fascist because of its stringent laws and harsh punishments
Fascism is a deliberately slippery word, so arguments about what is and is not fascist are often pointless.

white guy in his 20s wants to go to SEA to get drunk and do lots of drugs around dirty brownoids

arrives in singapore, it's clean, no drugs allowed, they're rich, he can't get away with being a boor by waving his first world white guy status

REEEEE IT'S FASCISM REEEEEE

Yeah I kinda doubt ideology was the culprit in this particular case OP. Call it a hunch but it think the majority who took over could have ruined the country regardless of government type.

Also isn't the majority population kicking out the minority population and taking their stuff without due process what the USA is doing to Hispanics? Seems kinda hypocritical to criticize the same thing you support somewhere else.

So why is South Korea so much richer than the north? They had the same culture. Obviously theres a balance, but the government has far too much power

Like I said, I think that weak government and capitalism are good. But they're not the end all be all. The quality of life in South Korea is better than most of the world, but it's still worse than pretty much anywhere in Europe (or it was before Europe started importing Muslims)

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disneyland_with_the_Death_Penalty
It is Disneyland with the death penalty

Oh sure, thats due to stronger Christian foundations in European culture than South Korean, where its just establishing itself.
But any attempt by the government to control culture will inevitably backlash, so ideally the church should support itself and manage most charity and social activism

Unironically pretty good. The socialists will be raped in the polls.

Nta but I think his point is that cultivating a high trust society that also values ordered liberty creates a naturally libertarian state with strong emphasis on community and family. Your government that's socialist free won't last forever if your culture encourages pornography use, faultless divorce, irreligious (i.e. non-Christian) governance and communities, etc. You'll still end up manufacturing socialists, and your existence will be a never ending war against the diseased, rather than being able to ever enjoy the fruits of your labor in a society that is both 1. Fundamentally good (i.e. Christian but like seriously) at its core and 2. Blessed with prosperity. Basically, it's more than just "owning da libs!" or "owning the tankies!" or whatever. A society without purpose collapses upon itself, and that purpose shouldn't just be to own the libs, preferably.

We go left wing not because we think it'll pay for your toys, but because BILLIONS MUST DIE.
You'd think u chuds would understand this baka.

enjoy reasonably functional colonial age infrastructure before you're deposed

pass that same infrastructure (which you didn't maintain because you were too busy making nukes with jews) onto the next administration

"Oh look at these niggers, they destroy everything they touch"

I absolutely agree, and I personally am Christian. The issue is that societies that force religiosity also turn into dumps. The only possible solution is for people to take personal responsibility and for a strong church influence on daily life. Ultimately thats not something that can be forced, its just gotta develop through the power of the gospel

Why did the same thing happen to Rhodesia becoming Zimbabwe, then? Something like a nickel, having two of em, etc.

my point was that I think only white countries are good

Non white countries have been Christian too, and those are generally better off.
A strong Christian tradition and libertarian values can make any society good, ethnicity doesnt come into it

A strong Christian tradition

God Christian are so retarded. I'm glad people like you exist because you alone are the driving force moving white men away from Christianity.

Nothing about people believing in God, its about creating a guilt culture. Find a map of guilt vs honour as the driving motive behind good behaviour in countries, and compare with a map of living standards.
Christian traditions encourage the guilt culture

Maybe South Africa is an exception
Why don't we look at other areas where left wing policy has been enacted for a long time and see how they turned out
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Selma_to_Montgomery_marches
The March from Selma is in the civil rights history section. I wonder how Selma is doing now
youtu.be/v-ZE47K9Sd0
Little Rock is famous from the Little Rock 9, Eisenhower sending the 101st airborne to escort those kids to school
youtu.be/0wQhaXoFKWM
How's little rock Arkansas doing these days?
Doesn't seem to be doing great.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_on_Washington
Is the crime rate in Washington DC higher or lower than 1963 and the March on Washington?

I think that's actually just being too lazy to get up an hour earlier on Sunday. Plus, pornography and societal/cultural pressure against Christianity for the first time in the Anglosphere in probably a thousand years or so.

Surprised you didn't mention East St Louis. 95% white in the early 20th century until progressive commies decided it needed diversity.

I think Christianity is bad because slave morality is bad.

Why is it that Christians effectively dominated the biggest and highest quality cultures for so long under alleged "slave morality?" Have you ever thought that maybe "slave morality" could be an incorrect interpretation of the texts? Much to consider...

Christianity doesnt teach slave morality outside of Nietzschean interpretation, if you actually go to a church, read a Bible, or study Christian history you would see that Christianity is often opposed to the mainstream and willing to put effort in to change society. We just dont do terrorism to get our way like some other religions

I want to war with South Africa. I'll join the military if we are shooting at racist nigs that think they are hard

turn the other cheek

the meek shall inherit the earth

believe in me and your sins will be washed away

Definitely not slave morality lmao
Because 90% of those Christians didn't practice Christianity at all. Those countries were successful because they were white.

Spain stayed out of the war and fell after Franco died because without a strongman and without a scapegoat/enemy there is no reason to remain fascist. It's also worth noting that post fascism countries don't end up being all that great either. Spain has a lot of problems these days as a result of its legacy.

Ah yes the infrastructure wasn't maintained that's why South Africa was failing under apartheid rule.. right?
Because derelict infrastructure waits for 30 years after being handed to niggers to start failing

turn the other cheek

You think sectarian violence is bad in Europe? Look at the Middle East to see what happens when a religion says to kill your enemies. Martin Luther King turned the other cheek and led to the greatest progress in the Civil right movement. When his philosophy was lost, progress stagnated. Did he have a slave morality?

the meek shall inherit the earth

This means people who have violence dealt to them arent less just because they were attacked. At the time the Jews though people dealt a bad hand were hated by God, Christ taught that they are loved, which means we as Christians should care for them. This helps create a community spirit that allows charity and successful, amicable social structures.

believe in me and your sins will be washed away

Not sure how you think this makes us slaves. Could you elaborate?

left wing policy enacted for a long time

fucking alabama and arkansas are the examples

lmfao how can you be this retarded

look at the middle east

Of course Islam is worse than Christianity. Christians are white. This doesn't render Christianity immune to criticism

Martin Luther King

lol

This means people who have violence dealt to them arent less just because they were attacked.

I understand it means that people who accomplish little beyond suffering are the most virtuous, which is a terribly backwards perspective

could you elaborate

Any reasonable religion would promote good works. Good works make the world better. Salvation through faith alone disincentivizes people from doing good works. Only a slave believes that success comes from prostrating himself to his master.

Argentina sucks right now you retard lmfao.

Why did you ignore all the other cities mentioned?

Christians are white

This is not entirely true, Christianity isnt an ethnoreligion. Lebanon is a great example of a Middle Eastern nation without natural resource wealth that was wealthy as a majority Christian nation until Muslims became the majority. After this it has declined to one of the poorest in the region. Ethnicity is not as important as religion.

lol

Im not entirely sure what your counterpoint is here, if theres a problem with my example of Christian activism being successful, id rather you stated it

people who accomplish little beyond suffering are the most virtuous

I recommend reading the rest of the beatitudes, it goes on to praise and bless virtuous people. But again, Christ was specifically overturning the Jewish idea that just because bad things happen to you, doesnt mean God hates you. He never says only those who suffer are blessed, he blesses them despite their suffering, as a first century Jewish audience would be well aware of

Salvation through faith alone disincentivizes people from doing good works

Only about a quarter of Christians believe sola fide, but in its defence, works are still required by it, they just come as the fruit of faith, while faith is the mechanism of salvation. James 2 covers this.

Could you show a graph that covers more than the first month of his presidency? You know, the month he instituted shock therapy designed to briefly cripple the economy to allow it to readjust? That thing he campaigned on doing and did to great success?

Communism and niggers are more destructive then nuclear bombs.

Communism has killed more people than all nuclear disasters and weapons in history

because the vast majority of big cities are run by the democrats, the fact that some happen to be shitty is hardly notable.
If you actually wanted to look at the effect of policy of the parties you'd compare homicide at the state level, but you won't

ethnicity is not as important as religion

There are dozens of majority christian states in africa and latin america that are absolute dogshit. The Philippines is dogshit. Meanwhile, a lot of the most successful countries in the world are effectively nonreligious.

only about a quarter of Christians believe sola fide

Which is why christian countries are so successful. If the people living in them actually followed Christian doctrine, they'd collapse, because Christianity argues that virtue comes from being humble and chaste, not from accomplishing great things. That is not a recipe for success.

Do you really think there's no connection between the political leadership of a city and quality of life in the city?

There are dozens of majority christian states in africa

This is true, my original point was long Christian tradition and libertarian values. Latin America has only had the former and Africa has had neither.

If the people living in them actually followed Christian doctrine, they'd collapse

I assume youre American? Sola fide is not universal Christian doctrine, its Protestant doctrine. The Roman Catholic and Orthodox churches have taught that works and faith are required for salvation, and even Protestant churches teach that works are a necessary fruit of faith, again I refer you to James 2.

Christianity argues that virtue comes from being humble and chaste, not from accomplishing great things

The Christian model for virtue is Jesus, who was humble and chaste, yes, but ALSO achieved great things. Christianity supports great things being achieved, and libertarianism complements it. The reason they work so well together is because Christianity reminds us to take care of those who are unable to achieve great things, due to age, disability or some other reason.

Why? Why are you just glossing over that a majority of these cities are shitty and run by Democrats?
Why isn't Detroit or Chicago good places to live when they had Democrats in charge for 60+ years? When they had Black Mayors, Black Senators, Black Governors representing them?

You are retarded. I live in brazil in a place that borders argentina and we are having problems because argentinians are buying everything since they finally have money. Milei is doing great but he has to get reelected because argentina needs more time to heal from leftism.

Yes, the catholic and orthodox churches teach that salvation does not come through faith alone, and they are wrong. That is not what the Bible says.

Christianity promotes achievement

I mean, does it? Are those the rules that young christians are taught in Sunday school? That they ought to conquer, and create, and ignore traditional morals because it's more important to accomplish something excellent?

Why are you guys January 6ing Bolsenaro?

His graph only shows the first month of Mileis shock therapy. When things were SUPPOSED to get worse. Socialists have to lie, because otherwise they have no leg to stand on

Ask the Russians how well shock therapy works you retard. Even then, Yeltsin might've been a retarded drunk, but at least he didn't rugpull a cryptoscam on his own people kek. Keep sucking up to the US and IMF though, I'm sure it'll do wonders for Argentina.

You're such a disingenuous freak. The only time Argentina was on an upward trend was when Peron was in power instituting barely leftist policies. Lula won btw.

and they are wrong

Wise theological insight, but irrelevant. When countries have a strong Christian tradition, that tradition will predate Protestantism. And regardless, any church with even slightly orthodox theology will teach that works are a necessary fruit of faith.

Are those the rules that young christians are taught in Sunday school

I never went to Sunday School so IDK, I dont come from a Christian family.

conquer, and create, and ignore traditional morals because its more important to accomplish

I disagree with the premise that that makes a society successful. We are absolutely told to create, and accomplish things, but were also told to help each other. A libertarian ideology forces people to produce as much as possible simply to compete in the market, Christianity balances that by promoting a culture of charity and community. Just last Sunday a local farmer provided free lunch for my Church, that helps to make a successful society more than if he shot the other farmers because he cared about conquest over traditional morality.

conquer

conquest

Is that an invincible reference!??