Maybe we are wrong

Sheesh, I was out at Hobby Town yesterday to pick up some paints and my favorite was the 220 lbs, 5;6" guy in flip flops, ratty cargo shorts, a worn hawaiian shirt, mostly bald with a bird's nest beard followed by his wife in a literal hobbit cosplay outfit she obviously wore as street clothes and their 3-4 year old daughter tagging along.

the thing is men and women have completely different ideas of what a "personality" is. Men think personality is something you don't see. Men think personality is how you act and behave and how you respond to certain stimuli. My personality is easygoing because I'm not very strict and I like to unwind with video games, for example.

For women, the idea of personality is purely visual. Personality is how you dress and present yourself to the world. It can be entirely, 100% fake. Personality, to women, is walking around with a guitar and playing stairway to heaven on balconies. Personality, to women, isn't being a good cook, but having a bunch of tattoos that show off how much you love cooking. Personality, to women, is owning a motorcycle and a leather jacket and long hair.

The thing is, every guy has personality. But to women, only the fakest shitheads who walk around with shag carpet top hats have personality.

The problem isn't what women want. The problem is that women are whores
I'd rather adopt a teenager girl and groom her to by my wife than fuck a nonvirgin
t. 6'1 handsome guy with a fairly big cock

Iam a litteral nazi and i am quite sure the women who would be compatible with me would be a fucking mess which i wouldnt be attracted to.
Faking is way to exhausting and therefor ... it is what it is.

Generally speaking if a woman enjoys talking to you she will date you if she doesn't have a boyfriend or better options, but if you're in a school or university environment talk to the women there during down time since everyone's bored anyways, you have a justification for making small talk, then after a couple of conversations if you two enjoy each others company and she starts seeking you out to chat, you can ask her out casually, chances are she will say yes.
Despite all the memes, women don't care as much about looks, they will have a couple of dealbreakers, most common ones would be don't be shorter then me, don't be too fat/too skinny, don't have too many pimples, don't be too neotenous etc. but generally as long as you meet those they'd be fine dating you.
Also, there are a decent amount of adult virgin women, so not every woman is a whore, many are but if you're on Anon Babble I doubt you're hanging in circles that whores frequent anyways.

I bet you mog everyone, sure

63% of men compared to 34% of women report being single in 2023

pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/02/08/for-valentines-day-5-facts-about-single-americans/

45% of men aged 18 to 25 report bever having approached a woman for a date

So I guess men are having lots of bluetooth sex or are super gay and just plapjacking femboys instead or something and then leaving. I'm not sure how you have sex without approaching a woman desu.

In any case, if I'm a rarity, that means I can be superior to other men because I'm a virgin at 25 again. I am more mentally and spiritually virtuous than 97% of men, if what you're saying is true, and I can treat my problems like they are just my own again and normies won't understand me or whatever and my suffering and frustrations won't be co-opted anymore by wagies staying home from their 9-5 due to covid and wondering if maybe they're secretly miserable and I'm right.

Are all women lying?

No, they're not, they just don't know what they're talking about.

man and woman go on three dates, have sex

Ask woman 'are you in a relationship?" she says "yes"

Ask man "are you in a relationship?" he says "no"

You also skipped the part where most of them men WEREN'T LOOKING

45% haven't approached a woman

Another lousy fucked up psyop lie.
What the report ACTUALLY SAYS

Among the less than 400 people on Social media the researcher got responses from (lol) among men aged 18-25 29% have never approached a woman IN PERSON for a date and another 26% had not approached a woman in person for a date WITHIN THE LAST YEAR

Asking someone you already knew? Not an "approach". Asking someone vie text, email, a mutual friend, or on social media? Not an approach

Among the men who had never appraoched/not in a year 80% of them HAD asked a woman on a date, just not a stranger in person

That means among the social media people that responded less than 6% of men aged 18-25 never asked a woman on a date ever.

it is a TOTAL bullshit social media question that Black Piller STILL have to lie about

This, so much this. In their mind, a man who isn't at least chadlite is so out of the question that it doesn't even make sense to mention it. Saying

I like a nerdy guy who is also a chad

Is to them like

I like sandwiches who are also not covered in shit

asking the blackpilled people how to get laid is like asking someone who's never cooked a day in their life how to make brisket.

I never leave the house and think TBBT is accurate, too

FTFY

damn i have never thought of it this way before but holy shit this makes so much sense .
so what you mean is that to women personality is basically looks but not face or body but how you dress or show off ?

This is probably the most retarded shit I have seen on Anon Babble in a week.And that is impressive.

Don't listen to what women say, watch to what women do, their preference is clear.
How often do you see videos of women having a subconscious reaction to a short bald man with a good personality?
How often do you see a woman unknowingly making puppy dog eyes at a tall handsome man?
We need to stop listening to people, words betray the truth, we need to start focusing on what people do.

I don't think most of them weren't looking, and also even if they weren't it's not like that means they're are in relationships. Also, how does your "3%" explain picrel?

Well, I mean, here's the study: datepsychology.com/risk-aversion-and-dating/
You're right that it's 400 men and subject to biases due to people choosing to engage with the questionair. That said, it's still a decent sample size, and you still need to discredit it off of whatever biases you think would happen from just getting random-ish guys on social media.

And I was mistaken because I thought you needed to approach a woman in person to have sex with her, but that's not what is meant by it. You can meet a woman online and then date her without ever appraching her in person, technically.

60% of young men said they regretted not approaching. If they were happily in relationships and having sex and successfully approaching women online like you say, why would they regret not approaching women? What, do they regret not cheating?

>Among the men who had never appraoched/not in a year 80% of them HAD asked a woman on a date, just not a stranger in person

And yet the men regret not approaching women and also 74% of young women wanted men to approach them.

>That means that among the social media people that responded less than 6% of men aged 18-25 never asked a woman on a date ever.

No it doesn't. How did you get that from 80% of men asking women to date online? 1. People can ask people out online and in person. And, even assuming they couldn't to make the math easier, taking 55% of the 20% would leave 9%, not 6.

it is a TOTAL bullshit social media question that Black Piller STILL have to lie about

No, it's not. The person who wrote the study explains its limitations just fine. If blackpillers abuse the work, that's on them, not the author.

Also, give me the sauce to your wild virginity statistic. Let's discuss that one. I don't think 3 percent is even close, or I'm rare.

posting these side by side makes you a barely cognizant animal. both of these charts come from fake blog posts for the lulz, and the right one clearly shows that most people are scored higher in attractiveness.

mfw when there are zoomers who think that okcupid ever let you rate "personality" from looking at a photo

you can meet a woman online

this doesn't happen. dead internet theory is true and there are literally studies on this shit. less than 2% of single heterosexual men meet women online for dates. most guys might DM/text a girl they are familiar with or hear about to meet her "online" but it's never a stranger.

Well, I mean yeah, but women are kind of right about personality being in appearance. It's not what you do in their mind, but how you express yourself(your accent, your politics, your favorite iced cream with friends, what you wear). Like, I don't think personaility is what you do, it's who you are. So, like, if you experience hardship or illness, your personality shines though via what of your style remains anyway even though you can't really "do" anything.

Personality, according to men, is performative because it's about what you do, not what you could do.

Personality, according to women, is performative because it is about what you could do, not what you actually do.

I mean, I think they're kinda both right, with the worst women being larping pretencious posers and the worst men treating having money and brapping a sportscar like that's all it means to be high class.

Yeah, you're probably right. I didn't consider that. Like lots of men try to date online, and then they get their information stolen and ghosted because it's just a bot.

Less than 2% is insane with all the people dating online these days. Where did you get that?

It's not fake, it comes from Dataclysm. Women think most men are revolting.

I'm not that ugly, but no woman has ever approached me in my life at 30 years old.

Those guys are jestermaxxed paypigs and their girlfriends cuck them for chad behind their backs.

try to make small talk with a woman.

"ICK, SAVE ME CHAD!" *runs away*

Well not getting laid forces you to look at things from an objective outside perspective. If you wanted to know how to breed a mare, would you ask a stallion? Of course you wouldn't since the stallion is just a stupid fucking animal who has no idea what's going on. So too are most sex havers.

Hits a little too close to home, huh?

Men have "subconscious reactions" to the small minority of women with huge anime tits, but they'll still sleep with, and have massive explosive orgasms for, women who are total chestlets. Man or woman, you don't need to be head-turningly hot to be desirable and give someone good sex.

Are all women lying?

Not exactly. Most people do get laid. Most people are in long term relationships and not hooking up with randoms. If you want to be like Chad and pump and dump random bitches who lust for your existence, you need a good combination of looks, charisma, status, and money. If you want a long term relationship with an average woman who tolerates you, you need a good combination of extroversion, servility, status, and money.

its your personali-ACK

lol

I don't even totally agree with blackpills but this is incredibly good advice in general. People lie to save face all the time; in fact, the people who live more virtuously are more likely to keep quiet about it because they don't need to compensate for being a shitty person.
You'll sometimes see short guys with cute girlfriends if you go outside, yet most of the women who actually brag about liking short guys just so happen to have a 6'0"+ boyfriend.

I've seen ugly guys with girlfriends

vs

hundreds of studies proving the bp right