We are living through the era of male liberation...

We are living through the era of male liberation. The cuckold fetish and humiliation ritual previously known as marriage will be nothing more than a meme to laugh at in a few years.

Men are true retards, they should be begging for the safety of marriage given how women will outperform them at everything in the near future

given how women will outperform them at everything in the near future

Give me the basic gestalt on this. By which exact measure will women outperform them? Having more wealth?

It's a shitpost, but there's some truth to it. Male physical strength is outmoded by machinery. Typical male intellect is being outmoded by computers/AI. Even if this wasn't the case, power in society has always come from the socially connected, and men are falling behind socially. Fathers throw more resources at their daughters, widows outlive their husbands. The list goes on.

A legal contract for sharing ownership of property between two families used for thousands of years is bad because brainrot

originally kys faggot

KOMPUTER STRONK

Men should own women

Typical male intellect is being outmoded by computers/AI.

Interesting, tell me more about this part. What exactly is being "outmoded"?

A legal contract? Whatever agreements you make beforehand get thrown out of court if the beneficiary(female) wants your belongings.

Yeah, computer is strong. The majority of jobs are already bullshit that doesn't actually require the 5 extra IQ points you get for being male.

They physical world was automated long ago, and the digital world is being increasingly automated too. The winners will be the ones who can socially engineer a legal protections for their field, or just own a lot of capital in the first place. You'll have a handful of mostly male eggheads at the top, but the rest of maledom will suffer under the oppressive bureaucracy and office politics.

The game is changing. Women get handicaps and mulligans, men get austerity. Even once women have taken the lead, they will still get full subsidy and support. The purpose of a man will be to work the dangerous shit jobs that women don't want to do. Men will only be valuable insofar that they are expendable, not because they're better at the job.

bloody hell that sounds stupid. can't wait for that stupidity to outperform me.

172868672075.jpg - 735x535, 165.21K

They physical world was automated long ago

That's very interesting because the last time I checked, it is the field of employment that is being automated at the slowest pace. Currently the most rapidly shrinking sectors are data entry/database management and those kinds of office jobs.

education, wealth, skills that won't be deprecated as says, more driven to succeed in general while men got caught in a crap loop that makes them believe rejecting society is good.
They ended up being retards that got stuck in defining masculinity and falling into pua/manosphere crap while women just work hard, advance their careers and improve their station in life.

women

hard work

who writes this shit?

more driven to succeed

Right and their success just exists in a vacuum. They just reach out and get shit done all on their own. All the systems in place are actually robots and women just live in a sandbox where they build their own success. I'm glad we cleared that up.

it's a fembot fantasy tred. let the girls dream too, will you? can they fantasize about something else other than chad thundercock?

Mostly old, unwanted males with a serious humiliation fetish. That's my theory anyway.

how women will outperform them at everything in the near future

women don't want to marry lol men that perform worse than them lol

Computers do the math for you, and they do the math very quickly. In 1970 women were 10% of the accounting graduates, now they are 60%. Similar kind of stuff with the actuarial sciences. Lots of math, lots of shit you have to memorize, lots of systemic thinking needed to do the job effectively. These these roles have increasingly been reduced to machine operator level positions, which can be done by just about anyone.

Physical machines reduce the physical load, computing machines reduce the mental load. Whatever advantages men allegedly have over women have been equalized by machines.

I'm not making some bold prediction about AI, I'm talking about shit that has already happened. The machines allow 90% of people to work 90% of jobs just about equally.

Whatever advantages men allegedly have over women have been equalized by machines.

But that never happened. What you're talking about are data entry tier jobs and those are the ones currently being axed, not actual software development which is still extremely male dominated and not because it's a boys' club.
Male dominated fields are the least threatened in the near future. Accountants and other bean counters? They're on their way out. I don't think you have a holistic understanding of this subject.

I wonder if you get off while drooling your fantasies out. kek.

The machines allow 90% of people to work 90% of jobs just about equally.

sure, sweetheart, whatever helps you sleep at night.

The excavator is a piece of automation technology. What you're describing is full automation. I'm talking about automation that removes strength, skill, or intellect barriers. Anyone can do these jobs with these automated tools. The best paying roles go to those who can socially engineer a favorable position in the organization or maintain a strong union. As it stands the teaching and nursing unions are blowing every other union out of the water in terms of what they manage to negotiate for their members, as well as the level of public support they have from the general populace.

muh software development

Yeah, a handful of mostly male eggheads. I specifically mentioned them. There's maybe a quarter million of them that are worth anything. That says nothing about the prospects of the average man compared to the average woman.

Men always do this shit and it's embarrassing. Latching onto the achievements of a few great men and claiming it as a win for the team. Sure thing, pal. Becky and Stacy don't have to work that hard, they just collect their six figure nursing pay packages because they've socially engineered strong support for their field.

Women will win, you'll cry because they're "cheating" by engineering their way up the social heirarchy, and then everyone will dismiss you as nothing but an sour grapes incel.

The economy could not function if it was not possible for average people to do the average jobs. Only the bleeding edge requires peak intelligence.

the safety of marriage

hohohoho
HAHAHAHA

you don't see the world as it is. it is as simple as picrel. still is as of 2025. no amount of wishful girly thinking is changing it.

So female jobs are future proof because one of their unions cause the most trouble? That's an interesting train of thought.

Women will win, you'll cry because they're "cheating" by engineering their way up the social heirarchy

I sincerely doubt they will win, if winning is defined by what you can offer to the job market. Women simply can not compete with men, never have, never will. Women can deny biological realities all they want, they can stockpile social credit and social capital, fiddle around in their low and middle management jobs, the purpose of which you couldn't even define in a few short sentences, but you will eventually come face to face with the fact that all you will ever have is maintained and built by men and if those men decide to simply do less, then your quality of life will directly decrease because of it. If your job ceased to exist, no one would be able to tell the difference.

I don't think you get it dude. Men built this world, women rule it. Pretty sure that means the women win.

Why worry about something that's never going to happen?

Why do you think the trades pay well? It's because they're union jobs. You can become a journeyman in just 2 years as an apprentice. The trades aren't some artisan craft that takes decades to perfect, It's something that just takes a little on the job training.

Women don't do those jobs because they don't have to, not because they can't. That's the only point I am making. Every year women earn more and men earn less.

It's already happened. They control 85% of household spending. Men build the things women demand, and men are stupid enough to be proud of being enslaved.

I'm not in a competition with my pet, anon. It does think I owe it, but that is simply because I'm a great being, who is capable of unconditional love despite all of the flaws it might have. And it is almost exactly the same with females, except I more like tolerate females for now, instead of loving them unconditionally. You just don't understand, which is funny.

Every year women earn more and men earn less.

Completely irrelevant for multiple reasons. Plus, you don't even know nor understand how the economy works and what it is. So enjoy the free gibs while it lasts.

Marriage will be a practice only the rich do as a performance ceremony

Read your post out loud, and tell me that you're not embarrassed writing like a discord mod.

Economy

The winners in every market are the ones who can subvert the market.

I am in full agreement, you make this argument quite competently

for fuck's sake. how many silly girls do I have to teach?

Economy

is

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy

and

The winners in every market are the ones who can subvert the market.

means jack shit whenever the whole thing is completely artificial, everything is overinflated and straight up made-up. Your endless money printing and stock market increase because a faggy cocksucker expects something positive is flatout stupid.
You don't understand that the essential, factual, tangible shit, is what's important. And it will continue to exist, be there, under any circumstances, and will always be valuable.
Whatever you do and your "system" does is almost completely irrelevant to the real world. Plus, you need more made up money to afford made up prices to keep the virtual circle up and running, so you will "earn" "more and more". Too bad it just doesn't mean anything. At all. And also this whole made up bubble could and will burst and one point, so beware.

I'm a school teacher. My services are legally required, I'm represented by the second strongest union in the country, and above all else, I'm surrounded by women. All they have to do is go on the local news every couple years, cry for the cameras, and then the voters approve another bond that gives us a 10% raise. 184 day contract, 75k now, 106k when I cap. The rules of the market do not apply when we have a district monopoly on all students living in our boundaries.

Know what the best part is? If everything somehow did go to shit, all I would have to do is put on a pair of work boots and live like you do.

I'm a teacher too. It's such a bullshit job. Nobody actually does any work because the goal isn't to educate children, it's to babysit. I hate my job so goddamn much.

What level? If it's high school you can cultivate an image that gets you better students. Best not to think too much or try too hard on the burnouts.

babysitting

I get less than $2/hr per kid. Even if I was just babysitting they'd be getting a bargain. I don't have the nerve to go on camera and say we're underpaid, but thank God my colleagues have no problem doing that. I'm probably saying too much.

Last year it was high school, this year it was middle school until I quit because I hated it so much. Now I'm a substitute, which is REALLY just babysitting. I'm getting a job overseas soon, fuck american cities. The kids here are demons.
I don't know how much teachers should be paid. It's an important job, but most teachers suck shit at it, so maybe they shouldn't get more pay. Then again, maybe the reason we suck is that we have to accommodate the retarded educational policies that they keep pushing through. So I don't know. I want to quit teaching and work on curricula in the future.

middle school

Hell. I can understand the complaints there. I started in the GED program and just learned to communicate with the worst performing students.

The secret to getting good students is to try and position yourself in the sciences teaching a two part course, like Physics and Advanced physics. For Advanced Physics the final involves building a machine from scrap and writing about how the different concepts apply to how the machine works. The machine has to perform a function, and I don't tell the students what the function is until they've enrolled in the class. Build the machine, include enough concepts, and you get a guaranteed 100 on the final. It's a lot of work, but after a couple years it becomes legendary. None of my students enroll in physics unless they plan on taking advance physics next and putting in the work to build this machine. You only get students who are ready to do some amount of work for a guaranteed payout.

I want to quit teaching and work on curricula in the future.

I was like that once. Decided that my hardcore final was the best way to actually achieve it. It's GPT proof, you've got to design and build the machine before you can write about it.

I get what you're saying, but like I said, I live in a major city. All of the schools with work available are really bad. Anything that demands effort on the part of the students isn't allowed. They just get passed through.

Yeah, I've only ever worked the one district, and it's a pretty good one. Doesn't change the fact that tomorrow's criminals are in today's classrooms. No way around it, 5% of Americans will do time at some point in your life, so on average there's at least one in every classroom. All I can really do is set up want curriculum such that they don't even enroll in my class. They target the easy prey and break their will to teach.

Anything that demands effort on the part of the students isn't allowed

That's part of why the final and the rest of my class is graded the way it is. Very binary grading. I've mostly been left alone. Either the thing is done and they get full points or it's not done. I've heard horror stories though, and just one IEP with ridiculous accomodations can ruin your class culture.

If you ever do change your mind and come back, try to stick with it and build some mythos around your class to filter out the dregs.

I definitely will come back, but I'm gonna try to go to grad school. Maybe after that I'll teach, but I'll want to do it somewhere that doesn't suck shit

but I'll want to do it somewhere that doesn't suck shit

Early college programs are your best bet. Very tough to get those roles, and people NEVER leave them. A lot of online schools offer them too, so you can always put in time teaching online and put on your resume that you worked in early college. Will give you an edge in application if a position opens up.

Good luck out there.