If 20 people are invited to a barbecue and one dude takes half of the food, what should the other 19 people do with him?

If 20 people are invited to a barbecue and one dude takes half of the food, what should the other 19 people do with him?

file.gif - 439x405, 34.52K

If one guy owns the grill, the house, the food, and takes half after paying you to grill the food, what should you do to him?

you must envy others

Nah, wrongdoer. Just man the fuck up and make your own money.

Envy has nothing to do with it, greed is a cardinal sin that should be culled from humanity.

The oligarchs need to go. I don't care about le barbecue analogies.

Envy is "desire for the possessions or qualities of another." Isn't the guy taking other people's food the one guilty of that?

It depends on how much food I'm being paid to make and how much I'm being paid.
Too many variables to say whether I'd even accept the job, and I don't think you have a viable business plan. You're fired.

top 1000 people own almost everything

life is totally rigged, we have already lost the monopoly game but are expected to keep playing and paying rent

"just man up bro"

Yes, but how to "go" the oligarchs?

That's a terribly shitty metaphor. The people at the wealth distribution don't take the wealth.
It's given to them.

Point and laugh at the commies

muh wealth distribution

This is bad, why, exactly?
What's worse: If I have 10 bucks and you have 5, or I have 100 bucks and you have 45?

the line will go up forever bro! the slices get smaller but the pie gets bigger!

If the Federal Reserve can just print more money... Yes?

Depends, are the rest of us living under a bridge bcause of that one guy? You wouldn't happen to be that one guy would you? There's an easy solution to this and it involves you paying your taxes but if your kind keep engineering things to fuck over everyone else, this will not end well for the "job creators"

youtube.com/watch?v=KB4syeafOsQ

Just deciding how much money there is and who gets what without input from others is problematic.

You certainly are saying that

You could always start OWS 2.0, there's obviously political support for it and it would be a reprieve in the eyes of some from the usual racially/sexually divisive propaganda

implying it wouldn't get co-opted and poisoned the exact same way

kek

Shove a live siberian tiger into his ass

I don't see the problem if the other 19 people weren't eating the food then why shouldn't he take more if he's hungry

sandwichh.jpg - 922x1204, 440.14K

it's all hopeless don't even try

useful contribution to the thread, kid

I didn't say that
I just like poking holes in things. I'm a critical thinker.

This was a fun read lol

The premise is that 2.0 has been updated to resist the pitfalls of 1.0. Figure it out, astute critical thinkers of the world

If it doesn't accept the antics of the faggy troons and other freaks, it gets labeled a right-wing movement

muh left right

lol who gives a shit? you're smart enough to "fight the oligarchs" (or whatever) and a red or blue sticker is enough to defeat you intellectually? you're not cut out for this

This framing is retarded. You can make valid critiques about modern crony capitalism without sounding like a moron.

You realize some retards here completely stop talking to their families and friends over "left/right", yes?
It'd have to be embraced as a completely bipartisan thing

His point is correct anyway. Capitalists successfully use leftist progressivism as a way to dilute and destroy any leftist movement. If you want to focus on class, you need to break it down "intersectionally", remember, whites are the vanguard of the bourgeois... and men are the... oppression... you can't fight us fatcat--er i mean the rich unless you first end the oppression of the proletariat by the white bourgeois... patrarchial society thar divides the...
There isn't a way around it, leftism has this shit stuck to it like a fucking tumor. Socialism has to come from the right, NSDAP style unfortunately.

It's being given to them, they accept it. Therefore they are taking it

Low IQ NPCs need not apply

If the rich people are taking the money,
then the "poor people" below them are taking the goods and services they provide.

So everything equals out. Everyone willingly engages with the system and gets exactly what they want out of it.

Who's gonna chant the gay slogans?
You need low IQ NPCs for a big movement, or else you'll have that "Nevernude" issue

THERE ARE DOZENS OF US!

Just man up and lick the billionaire's asshole! being exploited is totally honorable, bro!

I'm sorry, I just wanted to post a thread with a graph and a question for (You)s because I'm a bad person.

the "poor people" below them are taking the goods and services they provide.

No? That's literally why Weegee killed the CEO.

wrongdoer

my brother in christ, the greedy and their mercenaries will be executed by pouring molten gold down their throats.
choose your side

this analogy doesnt make sense. the vast majority of the most successful 5% didn't steal anybodys money. i'm pretty sure stealing is illegal.

the most frequent type of theft by percentage is wage theft. that is, unpaid overtime, unlawful terminations, severance denial, and overloading workers without matching their pay among other things.
more wealth is stolen from workers this way than if all niggers were looting every day

Oy Vey! Stop noticing nazi goy

Kill his ass but in your case the gut who took the food also owns the grill anf funded the party so shut up

Thank him for cooking

the most frequent type of theft by percentage is wage theft.

Yeah there's so much shitting on company time.

the guy beating a robber deserves the death penalty!

this is what you said

that is not what he said

really.jpg - 777x935, 84.38K

he implied the act of a worker claiming back the time that's being unfairly taken from him is the problem.

depends on how much food he brought

Wait until you see the distribution of lifetime female sexual partners among straight men. It's more unequal that the wealth distribution.