What's wrong with living in a society where men and women are equal, something which feminists supports?

What's wrong with living in a society where men and women are equal, something which feminists supports?

scale.jpg - 1400x933, 94.11K

I need a dominant gf, to be her simp slave...

They already have equality but have gaslit themselves into believing its not enough and want even more equality (privileges)

Men start to feel useless when women are allowed to live up to their potential. Men can't live without the whole of society constantly coddling and celebrating their every piss like mommy did when he was 2.

because the only civilization that tried this was ours and it ended up as the 21th century west. its clearly a horrible idea when this is the society that results from it.

There are two flaws with this post.
First, feminists do not support equality. They support female supremacy.
Second, equality is not even a desirable outcome. People should be afforded rights in accordance wit their capacity, which for women is basically nothing because women are universally incompetent.

I sometimes wonder why politics is even a question at this point. We know what political policies will do because we can observe their effects on countries that implemented them. We should just pick the most successful societies and copy all of their politics. Is this not obvious?

Women joining the workforce ruined the economy for the average person.

equal

Something needs to be cut off of all baby girls if we're going to continue this charade. Until then I sleep hard. Let me know when we start to have that discussion.

Equality mean I get to go in women's bathrooms and sniff and lick the toilet seat.

Great idea !, has my support !

You can do that as a janitor.

What's wrong with living in a society where men and women are equal,

We are not and will never be. Today, men are pressured to be the men of old, yet with none of the benefits and opportunities they had

We're demanded to be Y yet expected to be X at the same time

marxism, leninism, maoism, feminism, etc. all stem from a philosophy of abundance, but abundance is a product of inequality. a "good" society prioritizes its resources on the people and roles in society that will be the most productive, and the history of social unrest, revolution, collapse etc can often just be summarized as a history of bad investments.

women entering the workforce doesn't double every families income, it halves everyone's wages (except at the top).

women demanding to be 50% of leadership positions doesn't diversify the effectiveness of decision making, it lowers the standard for becoming a leader (i.e. competency)

fighting to end gender roles makes both men and women confused about their gendered identities and who makes the first move, how to lead intimate relationships, etc.

there's always a balancing act between scarcity and abundance that every region and society will face, meaning that as life becomes good enough, you always get more inclusivity and comfort for more groups of people, but even on the topic of "gender equality" you can only have one of two outcomes: equality = strict conformity, or equality = anarchy. if we don't have normal gender roles, either you are told your role by someone in power, or everyone (including abusive, charismatic people) gains the power to create the new normal, and in both scenarios quality of life goes down, not up. the existence of dimorphism guarantees some shaping of gender roles, so you can't escape those entirely like you can with religion or ethnic groups over time (which are more complicated subjects)

Nah, I've cleaned bathrooms for a big fast food chain before and usually they just get an undocumented lady to clean the women's part of the restrooms, and when they can't they just get another employee to escort you if you are male unfortunately. That's why men and women bathrooms are usually never the same level of clean.

society becomes equal opportunity

underdeveloped female brain craves for superior male

pool of "genetically worthy males" shrinks inside their minds

they end up sharing the same few males

we go back to pre-sapient levels of reproductive percentages, having packs of one male having many females

average male chooses to destroy or not engage with system

we're here

What gets me is that the "average males" are usually much more desirable mates than the women who reject them. If men were not worthwhile, our unwillingness to engage with the system wouldn't matter.

"average males" are usually much more desirable mates than the women who reject them

not necesarily. by animalistic standards average isn't that desireable. but evolved, societal standards are a different thing entirely.
A ravenous animal looks for the most dominating member that can guarantee safety and food security. In society, a lot of dangers are dead, or extremely weakened, so one would look for someone that can handle themselves around society and live in mild comfort.
economic equality in terms of man vs woman, and economic crisis in terms of society, means the average woman still looks for a dominant above average man, but there's no real opportunity to fit a solid criteria

What I mean is that if you compare the average woman to the average man, the average man is a much more capable member of the species. The average woman serves no purpose except as an incubator. But for some reason they still hold all the power.

in the cases where women do develop society brains, they can take roles where their differences are put to good use and their reproductive standard changes, but that development is rare

Men and women are inherently unequivocally unequal, trying to force them into the same roles as men is unfair to them, like shit dude who even wants to work all day when you can spend only like half the morning doing house work then watch the soaps. Thats not really an option any more because herpaderpa 50/50 obligatory sexes in the workplace!!!!1 What do you mean were an oil refinery MORE WOMEN MEANS LOWER WAGES YOU FOOL get thy pussy in here

Women don't want to people equal to themselves they'll just want Chad

Women are like black people in that respect, clearly still operating at the same level of development as monkeys

Nothing, but there's no society that has all three.

I support feminism, all real feminists want a world without gendered expectations forced on anyone, which is better for both men and women. Most men who are anti-feminist have run into one of the toxic feminist types who just hate men, but those people don't mean you need to be against feminism as a whole.

Also, I want to be a woman.

Because they have it already; but it only serves Mr. Shelekbergstein, as now there's two wage-slaves who are soaked for basic living expenses.
One-breadwinner families were far superior to the dystopian shit we have now; kids are raised by the state more than by their parents. Despicable.

Also, I want to be a woman.

This has nothing to do with anything you just stated why even write it?

This. Women are like children so when they cheat or decide to kill their husband/child out of boredom they can't be held responsible. But they are still human and we should make sure that men can't abuse them or exploit them, so they should have jobs, just the easy one's that pay well so they aren't reliant on some incel creepwad.

Men can do the shitty paying dangerous jobs and go die in wars, I think that's fair as they don't birth to children and are capable. Imo we shouldn't even really be giving men welfare when they become useless 2bh, just a gun and a single bullet so they can kill themselves so they aren't a drain on society.

Why do you lie so fucking much? All that feminism has ever done is giving women privileges and creating narratives to demonize men

Children are absolutely held responsible for those things and judged like adults when the crime is severe enough.
Just stop with the lies

Because I want to be a woman, anon

And we need to ramp up child support and alimony starting from birth, and make paternity tests illegal, as women have no agency so men who were married to them at the time have to take more responsibility for the child even if it's not theirs.

Also a bachelor's tax to force incel men to provide and protect women even the ones that choose not to have sex with them desu

desu

Why do you want to be a woman so hard?

No one's putting a toddler in prison for stabbing someone because their parents gave them a knife dumbass faggot

10-8 years olds have been judged like adults for doing crimes grave enough.

giving them knifes

Completely worthless made up situation that does not address what you've proposed

woman

wants to abuse men

imagine my shock

Woman have had equality for ages. Now the balance is skewed too far the other way in their favour.
Its whatever really. I plan to leave the west behind.

I have no idea what this post is trying to say but Im getting stoned now and going to the gym

just a gun and a single bullet

I like this idea, but I wouldn't be using it on myself.

I mean I'm fine with what gender equality would be ideally, but what feminist peeps support isn't really gender equality.

trad for thee but not for me

You aren't fooling anyone degenerate troon.

in what fucking way is blatant torture "trad"

the 21th century west

How is any of what was stated torture you fucking crybaby? Your forefathers had to deal with much worse you faggot bitch.