Do you actually read long threads?

Or do you just nope out when you're done talking? Sometimes I'd argue with a retard and wonder if there's any point to doing it, I'm sure there are lurkers who read it all, right?
But then again, I personally don't. Do you?

if it think its important I will

but if its something I consider trivial I wont

You're really drawling on there, could you condense that to a sentence?

So you don't read anything on r9k, noted. Many such cases

could you condense that to a sentence?

Do you actually long threads, or do you just nope out when you're done talking, sometimes I'd argue with a retard and wonder if there's any point to doing it, I'm sure there are lurkers who read it all, right, but then again, I personally don't, do you?

I read until I realize it's npd rambling. If I realize its not npd rambling I keep going. Npds are the niggers of this existence

Long threads are almost always about these fellas refusing to budge on any topic thoughever.

I'd respond in depth but you wrote a whole paragraph below, maybe consense everything you say and I'll consider reading it

I read basically everything on here.

Very true but once in awhile I hear someone in alot of pain that they internalize until they have to vent.

do u rid long treds?

picrel. You are mentally ill.

Damn you are a nice anon, keep being a nice anon.

I absolutely write walls of text sometimes...if you see a two parted back to back post both hitting 2000 character limit then it's probably me.

Anon...thats not a paragraph that's more like 2 sentences maybe more like 1.5 you are pretty brainrotted if you can't read that.

picrel. You are mentally ill.

Already took all my prescribed meds anon...

HRT does NOT count.
But if not HRT, it's over. You're too far gone.

keep being a nice anon.

Nice guys finish last and my post made me cry and your post made me cry. Do you even know how hard it is being a deeply feeling male? A fully grown man that fucking cries??

Yes, it's why I've been yogurt male maxxing after getting used by a roastie for the nth time. You should try mewing, maybe hit your brow ridge with a hammer for that hunter eyes look. Then you can be nice

I try to feel sorry for you ppl then I get this.

If it's less than 100 posts I'll skim. Anything over 200 is just a waste because the conversation has probably shifted and already turned into several dudes arguing

It is causality at its finest. Human beings always adapt, that is what makes us intelligent.

I consider anything above 50 to be most likely a waste of time tbqhdesu, at least on here

that is what makes us intelligent

Uhhh

HOLY SHIT
CAAAANN YOOOOUUUU TAAAAAAALLLLKKKKKKK AAAANNNYYYYY SLLOOOOOOOOWWWWEEEERRRRR

only halfway through

This shit needs a two times speed option

it's over

Thank you for the blogpost. But next time please use the written post feature using your keyboard, thank you very much.

Long texts here are usually sign of low quality.

A thread that starts with one usually required more time and effort so I would disagree. Sometimes I make threads talking about wrinkly brain stuff but since everybody here is retarded nobody has anything to say (I'm also retarded, but I've had plenty of time to think about what I write in the OP, as opposed to them if they wanted to respond in a timely manner)

Do not fart on me again you sick fucking nigger. You're banned off my threads, all of them

I read it all if I can tell within the first few words that I'm going to agree with it. Otherwise I will do what most redditors do and pretend I'm too brainrotted to read anything longer than a shitbait headline.

I was going to call you retarded but I probably do that too. Sometimes I'd just respond after reading the title and leave the stupid thread

I used to, but then you realize the mantras of the Anon Babble hivemind and it just becomes dull to. I skim for what appear to be interesting points or things I can debate on, but if it's over 100 replies I won't even bother unless it's really interesting.

Yeah, in long threads I tend to mostly focus on the posts with images then move on. That's why I post some when I want my voice to be heard inside the sea of replies.

I read them and keep them open for a while in a spare tab. But I don't argue with people, that's a waste of time.

That's how people are. They're terrified to admit they're wrong for some strange reason. But have you ever spoken to someone, had them argue with you, but suddenly turn around and start acting on what you said a week later? If you have something valuable to say, even if it doesn't seem like they want to hear it, it can get through to them anyway. They just need time to process and to be free of the pressure of being 'wrong'.

Nowadays a paragraph is one sentence and it's fucking infuriating.

I don't argue with people, that's a waste of time

Wise. I tell myself the same thing until I make an innocuous joke and end up offending someone.

That's how people are. They're terrified to admit they're wrong for some strange reason.

Yeah, and when I try to give up ground to make things more amicable they see it as a win, it's annoying.

But have you ever spoken to someone, had them argue with you, but suddenly turn around and start acting on what you said a week later? If you have something valuable to say, even if it doesn't seem like they want to hear it, it can get through to them anyway. They just need time to process and to be free of the pressure of being 'wrong'.

Interesting... I can't I remember this happening to me, I mostly just talk to my parents so it's not like I can respect to run into some anons a week later. But it's good to know that not everything I say goes down the treash.

I can respect

I can expect*

treash

The fuck is treash? Drain*

Don't give up ground like that then. I find it works better to acknowledge their side and how they feel as general practice, while explaining your own. Works well on women and schizos on the internet alike.
Hell now I stop to think about it there's a lot in common between how you deal with an emotional woman and how you deal with an angry incel.

The standard is the same on every board, but especially true here

is anybody getting (You)'s, yes or no?

No? I leave immediately. "Be the change you wanna see" is a cope, and replying to 5 people in those threads will yield one back on a good day. Trying to force some interactivity in the OP is a waste too, since that implies anyone read it. You can also gauge how many dipshits actually read a thread if you scroll through and it's

The obvious joke

The obvious joke again

The obvious joke AGAIN xD

I read this too. Is it bait? Neck yourself. Is it sincere? Neck yourself.

cpTHG3i.jpg - 775x775, 63.08K

Mmmh, I don't think I've had many successes with that too, but oh well. At least whenever I try to weasel my out because it becomes tiresome I usually start making things a little bit serious and start making joke. And sometimes they relax their butt cheeks.
But I think it's autism tbqh. I've always told myself that women and autists typed and reacted to a lot of things the same way.

Yeah I guess you're right. Never really put much importance to if a thread had any (You)s before but I they do tend to be barren of substance now that I think about it.

a little bit serious

a little bit less* serious
it's 6am saar please understand

Try Anon Babble sometime

What is your favorite X

Lists

Youtube links

Album covers

Word count: 0

Lmao, that does seem accurate. I used to use it and most of the times people were really talking about SOMETHING it was to shit on that Nico Sperg Guy (may he rest in peace)

His legend still persists, at least for the time being

This, and also I gravitate towards accounts, experiences and any form of storytelling...and any kind if high quality (original) content in general.

Unfortunately most of this website isn't really original. It's mostly the same few hundred or a few thousand easily identifiable neurons being fired again and again with a sprinkle of the rare millions or perhaps billions of original ideas.

He shall soon be a measure of newfaggotry

who tf is Nico Sperg Guy

lurk moar newfag

I can already see it

My experience has been the opposite. Autistic men particularly tend to be factual, and that gets mistaken for 'aggression' or attempting to offend when they're just being direct and honest.

Be the change is a cope.

Anon at this point finding myself interested in a board and gradually making it better just by existing in it has become a hobby for me.

Sample size is being enough to know what you're reading is utterly uninteresting ramblings and little else.

we're already there, fren. Also Lou Reed, even in death, will forever remain a talentless hack

file.png - 822x891, 162.05K

My experience has been the opposite. Autistic men particularly tend to be factual, and that gets mistaken for 'aggression' or attempting to offend when they're just being direct and honest.

Yeah, they are blunt but I don't know if I'd call them factual, not in my experience anywa

It's not ramblings though, sometimes it takes me day to write everything correctly so it makes the most sense possible. I just probably post it in the wrong board, that stuff belongs on Anon Babble, not Anon Babble

It's beautiful...

I mean most long threads in general, I have no idea which threads are yours

Or do you just nope out when you're done talking?

A bunch of anons do just that and it becomes obvious over time. One can be selective with reading replies. They like using the tactic of attacking you -- and if you reply, just don't read it. So you read their attack, but they didn't read yours. It's immature but it works.

I'm sure there are lurkers who read it all, right?

We've been lead to believe this over years, but I have my doubts now. I think most have the attitude of "this doesn't apply directly to me so I'm just ignoring it." A lot of anons want us to think there are tons of people just sitting on the sidelines as an audience to their bullshit... but Dead Internet Theory proves that entirely wrong.

No one is reading anything, for the most part.

I'll usually skim them if they have more than 30 or so replies. if the OP made an interesting thread with a story to tell or a those rare times OP is in the middle of doing something funny/unhinged I'll read OP's posts. Sometimes I'll read posts made from a specfic anon or a conversation between 2 or more anons. If a thread at 200+ I basically assumed I missed the boat and will on bother at all it its a 25/30+ thread, drugfeels or something.

Zoom zoom zoomie reading comprehension, folks.

'Truth' varies from person to person, anon. What's true to you is simply what you believe to be true at this point in time, based on the information you've been exposed to. Factual does not mean they are objectively correct, but that they tend to be prone to simply stating what they consider to be true.

Yeah, I guess it's like people who tell their entire life story when it's not needed for whatever they want to talk about

They like using the tactic of attacking you -- and if you reply, just don't read it. So you read their attack, but they didn't read yours. It's immature but it works.

A lot of the time, they get too curious and WILL read it and reply if you're being annoying to save face in front of the lurkers.

No one is reading anything, for the most part.

Yeah, this is what I've come to believe. At most there'd be two or three guys per long thread. Sometimes I can catch myself doing that when I'm banned.

Yeah I do the same except if the topic interesting and it's on a board where people can have actual conversations like Anon Babble or Anon Babble when somebody's not sperging out about haplogroups or religion

Good for (You), in the literal sense. Does that entail anything specific?
A few months I did on Anon Babble as I do everyday, including this one: write in the same stream of consciousness incoherent gibberish as Liam Gallagher. When someone said they couldn't understand, someone else told them "Lurk moar". It was a strange kind of honor. As You Were LGx

Yeah, you're making sense but I was more thinking that you meant that they were more prone to have an actual conversation

Lmao, what a medal of honor

have a good sleep
bye-bye

It's always rewarding when people do shit like this. It's something this place was good at once, but has forgotten. How to play along.

In 2007 you could make a stupid thread and 20 anons would jump in agreeing with you and talking as if your retarded nonsense was real, and it was glorious. Spontaneous camaraderie.

Now you can't do anything without some angry cunt choosing to seeth instead of joke around.

If a thread has more than 100 replies I automatically hide it. No sense in engaging with it.

I start long threads all the time, and they often don't end up being successful. I have to bump them all the time, and I might get one or two anons who go back and forth with me for a few posts up to a point. You can check out this thread I started if you're interested.

The obvious joke

The obvious joke again

The obvious joke AGAIN xD

Yeah too many people online are trying to be class clown and get the attention from it. It doesn't work when you have everyone desperately trying to make the same joke and the get like, reply, comment, etc...