This site is mostly filled with conservative incel MRA men many of whom hate jews and are nazis

And the fact that such an overwhelming majority of people here have that opinion objectively disproves their worldview. Because if their worldview was the objectively correct one, they wouldn't be posting it here. They'd be on Fox NEWS or CNN, they'd be some big time political streamer.

They'd have made something of themselves. And I know what your counter point is. Don't insult my intelligence by presuming that I wouldn't know your reply.

But Beanie, you haven't made a whole lot of yourself either.

But I am also just one person. And the fact that mass hordes of people all come by to tell me how wrong I am proves I am right. I am the outlier to my worldview. Others who hold my opinion are normal and successful.

Whereas racist chuds make up the majority here continually post about how MISERABLE THEIR LIVES ARE, and how often they think about unaliving themselves.

B-but normies-

You don't believe that. No normie is screaming at the top of his lungs about tinder dating statistics, or how chad gets all the bitches.

Bitch I'm a kike and I hate kikes. If your retarded tranny ass can't recognize that kikes are evil, you're just flat out stupid. But we ALL already knew that.

Judaism is an evil and murderous terrorist group.

No normie is screaming at the top of his lungs about tinder dating statistics

They are, in fact. My family talks about it, my colleagues talk about it, even the fucking national news in my country have talked about it. It's a pretty big subject.

I actually am quite left wing and don't dislike the jews
boom Op gets owned again

I think you're wrong.

I think that incel/mra/nazis are some of the most vocal online, especially in spaces like this where there is pseudo-anonymity, but that doesn't mean they're a majority.

It's okay to dislike these kind of people, they are generally annoying and tolerating them is paradoxically unfair, because they wouldn't extend the same kindness, but you're not going to erase them from spaces like this, and the rabbit hole goes far deeper in that regard.

There has been a wider shift that young males are experiencing towards redpill/conservative viewpoints and the solution isn't to whinge about it in places where you're most likely to attract that kind of attention. The solution is to get out there in the real world and make something of yourself, and hold space for those who are disenfranchised so that they don't gravitate towards what seems to be an attractive set of answers to all the problems in their life.

If you want to change the world, change yourself, and then create something that has values that you wish to propagate.

The NAZI party platform was far from conservative

encyclopedia.ushmm.org/content/en/article/nazi-party-platform

12. In view of the enormous sacrifices of life and property demanded of a nation by any war, personal enrichment from war must be regarded as a crime against the nation. We demand therefore the ruthless confiscation of all war profits.

13. We demand the nationalization of all businesses which have been formed into corporations (trusts).

14. We demand profit-sharing in large industrial enterprises.

It's okay to dislike these kind of people, they are generally annoying and tolerating them is paradoxically unfair, because they wouldn't extend the same kindness, but you're not going to erase them from spaces like this

The Gang Discusses the Jew Problem

Pointing out that dropping white phosphorus on children makes you a Nazi

The jewish persecution complex in full display.

AMNNNHH
NHH
HH

twitter.com/georgefloydhigh/status/1921522916191023466?t=-rB8Wjyg4YR1wm-Ipd1B_g&s=19

Your post doesn't make any sense and you also used the word "objectively" for a reason that isn't objective at all. It's like you're trying to piss me off. Argumentum ad populum. "If you were right then more people would think it."

the mentally ill 30 something fat faggot adds new flavor to the bait

So you're the Uncle Ruckus of Jews. Thats a pretty sad confession you made. I hope you're at least funny like Uncle Ruckus.

Thats objectively untrue. At best you could say ISRAEL is like that, but even then you wouldn't be correct about it. You're presuming all Jews are evil, and that simply isn't true.

Show me proof, link me articles then. If what you say is true, show me one shred of evidence for it.

You're also an outlier. I was told yesterday by someone who hated me and was arguing with me that I'm different from 90 percent of the people here and that I should fuck off. I trust their anger because when people get angry, they get honest.

The solution is to get out there in the real world and make something of yourself, and hold space for those who are disenfranchised so that they don't gravitate towards what seems to be an attractive set of answers to all the problems in their life.

Dammit, I can't even disagree with this. Thats a good point.

If you want to change the world, change yourself, and then create something that has values that you wish to propagate.

A fine point to make anon. Well done. I agree.

But Beanie, you haven't made a whole lot of yourself either.

But I am also just one person. And the fact that mass hordes of people all come by to tell me how wrong I am proves I am right. I am the outlier to my worldview. Others who hold my opinion are normal and successful

Trump, Andrew Tate, Elon Musk, and Kanye West hold my political views. They are some of if not the most successful and well known heroes of the world.

pilpul defeated.

This site is mostly filled with conservative incel MRA men many of whom hate jews and are nazis

umm based department?? no wonder Anon Babble is the best site

I hope you're at least funny like Uncle Ruckus.

Yeah I'm funny, but I'm Jewish, German and Greek.
Just go look at "her" other thread.

shit you just made up

daily reminder that donald is incontinent and wears diapers because he shits himself
also, TLDR, your post is padded with redundant adjectives

post your little useless girldick, beanie

Kanye West is a hero

He dressed up as a fucking Klansman and he's been shouting anti-semitic bullshit for years now

Andrew Tate is a sex trafficker.

Donald Trump is a convicted felon, rapist, cheated on his wife with a pornstar, fucked his friends wives in the 90s, did jan 6th, tried to rig an election. Was best friends with Jeffry Epstein. And I could go on and on and on and on and on.

I suppose you could argue they're all "successful" but that doesn't mean they're good people.

He dressed up as a fucking Klansman and he's been shouting anti-semitic bullshit for years now

So... A hero?

Andrew Tate is a sex trafficker.

Yeah he's also a repressing faggot.

Donald Trump is a convicted felon, rapist, cheated on his wife with a pornstar, fucked his friends wives in the 90s, did jan 6th, tried to rig an election. Was best friends with Jeffry Epstein. And I could go on and on and on and on and on.

Yeah he's a faggot.

I suppose you could argue they're all "successful" but that doesn't mean they're good people.

No shit retard

He dressed up as a fucking Klansman and he's been shouting anti-semitic bullshit for years now

nothing wrong with this, you sodding racist prick

This post amounts to saying that if a view is true, it will be popular. Then how did Nazis have an overwhelming majority in 1940? If Jews then had the correct view, why weren't they at the radios, in the newspapers, posting their Anti-Nazi views in academia... This is an extreme example, but it demonstrates that your post comes from a fundamentally flawed position: That truth is not determined by acceptance or popularity.

There's no reason to refute your midwit posts anyway because you're just another narcissistic, self importent redditor that doesn't know what they're talking about.

WAAA WAAA YOUR A NAZI

Yeah we are, Heil Hitler cunt

different from 90 percent of the people

'm not sure it's 90% though yeah the hatefull people are very loud

should fuck off

will you?

when people get angry, they get honest.

It's not that simple
because sometimes people say things they don't actually think just to make someone go away and leave them alone

N'wah heil Sithis

i dont believe in racisms, because i actually am a trucel

Oh shit Beanie, Mark the Thread Destroyer is here. You better fucking run!

They're all based and successful. That was the bar you set.

Because if their worldview was the objectively correct one, they wouldn't be posting it here. They'd be on Fox NEWS or CNN, they'd be some big time political streamer.

They are 4 of the largest men on the planet... Your side has nothing even close. Hell, even boy scout Tucker is starting to notice how evil jews are.

twitter.com/AFpost/status/1724942901288022356?t=3TtvVbz-F1aw-NonbVC2fQ&s=19

in before more Jewish word tricks and pilpul

you people can't help it. This is why I have jew fatigue

This post amounts to saying that if a view is true, it will be popular. Then how did Nazis have an overwhelming majority in 1940

They have to make it ILLEGAL to talk about to keep it from becoming popular again.

Antisemitic

is the All powerful word to tell you to shut the fuck up and stop thinking and OBEY

they are generally annoying and tolerating them is paradoxically unfair, because they wouldn't extend the same kindness

SO THEN GET THE FUCK OFF OF OUR BOARD. YOU CAN GO ANYWHERE ELSE ON THE INTERNET AND IMMEDIATELY FIND PEOPLE WHO AGREE WITH YOU ON MOST THINGS.

They have to make it ILLEGAL to talk about to keep it from becoming popular again.

Because as it turns out its very easy to make Jews into a scape goat. Because they always have been the scape goat, and so you can just continue to blame them for everything and nobody questions it.

Uh, and by the way, the government is fucking BASED, when it realizes its population is retarded and will absolutely lead itself down the road to ruin unless you outlaw being a antisemite racist.

Oregon Legalized all drugs, and look how that turned out for them. OOPS, TURNS OUT YOU NEED LAWS.

objectively

Here he goes again with the word he doesn't understand.

the problem with Anon Babble nazis and incels is they think they own the place. Just because you shit here and piss on the posts doesn't mean you own it.

Why didn't you reply to this post ?

jewish girl

small tits

It's ogre

Why do you think jews are blamed so often? Do you believe they're perfect little angels who never didn't do nothing?

Why do you think your people have been kicked out of so many countries?

why do you think coins have ridges?

Why is all most of Hollywood jews?

why do jews advocate for western countries to have unlimited African refugees? Yet if i asked you should Israel allow mass African refuges into its borders, what would you jews say? You will say it would be the death of your kind and of Israel.

If you want to have an actual discussion of why jews are always so hated then let's have it. I can lay out the numerous reasons for you. But let's end it with the trolling or Jewish tricks. Because they'll never work on me. I understand the Jewish mind better than most, probably even better than yourself.

twitter.com/Wordsarewordsz/status/1925664223700369564?t=oHN2Fsd0D3p5um1uJp6mNg&s=19

Dumb (fellow) kike, you know whites are the scapegoat. Kys tranny.

Beanie loves rapefugee cock in xer tranny asshole so arguing that point with them is not gonna get you anywhere.

i don't hate anyone
i just have the personality of a fish

This comment is retarded. I didn't ask if they love refugees. I asked if they would want them in Israel. I have never see a Jew say they want mass African refugees in Israel.

Do you understand why that is? But then why do they want and pay for so many NGOs to have mass African refugees pour into every western country? Think about that my retarded friend.

Have you no sympathy for them? I stand on their side because I feel sorry for them and I understand them. Except on the issue of racism here I support out of regret for the loss of European civilization, I'm not against other races but it's better to simplify to plain racism. But incels are just unlucky losers, I was like that 8 years ago and I understand how hard it is, even if I am doing well now.

There's a reason why your ideology was crushed ww2.

jews started ww2, paid Churchill to create Israel, used their international media to propaganda other countries to join and die for jews.

If I ask how many Jews died in WW2 why is that every single brainless idiot can quickly say 6 million? If I ask how many Russians died in ww2 to save jews? you don't know. If i ask how many Native Americans died in WW2 to save jews. You again do not know. If I ask how many Christians died in WW2 to save jews. Do you know?

No.

If I asked how many Russians did the jews kill during the Bolshevek massacres, will you be able to tell me?

If I ask what books were burned during ww2 will you be able to tell me?

You know nothing tranny retard.

Do you believe they're perfect little angels who never didn't do nothing?

People rarely are. But that doesn't mean what they've been through was ever justified.

Remember, the holocaust happened because people gave in to hatred and fear of the other. Such cruel dehumanization of people just out there living their normal lives. All of them robbed of the chance to live in our world, for something they didn't have any control over.

or Jewish tricks

This literally sounds like something an actual nazi would say. I feel like people here don't understand what its like to be the target of such vicious hate. Look at how everything you've typed basically doesn't offer any alternatives.

You are just writing Mein Kampf, this is literally just "jews are bad" and your only solution is the final solution.

do you faggots not get tired of interacting with these shit threads every fucking time

I like Beanie. She's kind

the holocaust didn't happen but they would have deserved it

Don't deny the dumpster fire isn't warm.
Fuck Kikes and fuck brainwashed retards.

of a retard

i've been here since 2006

Nope, you're a newfag larping as an oldfag same as always. Some little stupid nigger faggot, you were probably fucking 3 years old in 2006. Man its fucking sad.

You're pathetic, skulking around the corners of the internet like rats. There's a reason why your ideology was crushed ww2. Because it is weak. As much as you'd like to project otherwise.

This statement completely outs you as a newfag btw. You didn't even complain about stormfront. 1/10

In any case you're wrong. Anon Babble has always been sexist, its always been racist, its always been filled with gore, trolling, cheese pizza, silk road ect ect.

Stop pretending Anon Babble is some virtuous friendly website. It might resemble that more now but Anon Babble was one step away from illegal back in the day.

But that doesn't mean what they've been through was ever justified

How do you know? Do you know what they did? Do you understand why they were and are hated?

Remember, the holocaust happened because people gave in to hatred and fear of the

But did it? Did people give in to hatred? Do you understand what exactly it is you are doing currently? You are framing the narrative and expecting me to go along with whatever reality you've set. Do you want to have a discussion and learn why jews are hated or do you want to keep spouting platitudes and surface level nothingness?

living their normal lives

1. They had the chance to leave Germany but didn't.
2. What is normal? Answer my question, where is all of the porn coming from? Why do coins have ridges? Their is a pattern of behavior that different tribes of people present. Your tribes patterns have long been noticed and discussed and you don't seem to be have any idea of what those patterns are and why those patterns are so

This literally sounds like something an actual nazi would say. I feel like people here don't understand what its like to be the target of such vicious hate

Because I have ARGUED with jews for YEARS. I UNDERSTAND YOU. you are literally doing the same shit that all of the others do and it's expected at this point and I'm exhausted with it. You don't want to talk or discuss anything. You want to turn everything of all I said into

you are just repeating Mien Kraft

And thus this is another reason why you are hated. Not individually but as a group because this is one of your common stereotypes.

Now do you want to discuss this shit and learn why you're hated or do you want to do another round of Jewish tricks on me?

the world isn't some fairy tale where everyone's innocent and misunderstood
sometimes people do things that make others not like them
but god forbid you say that out loud without being called hitler

maybe i'm the villain
maybe i'm just bitter and broke and
blaming the nearest target
but if thinking critically is a hate crime now
then i guess i'll just sit here and be wrong with my tinfoil hat and unemployment

at least mein kampf had a thesis

nigga most of us tried being leftists at some point only to be chased out of leftist spaces for being "nice guys"

mein kampf

plagiarized work of Henry Ford

jewish women/tranny

hates men

hates white people

yeah your views are pretty normal for your group but that doesnt make them healthy or good

jews started ww2, paid Churchill to create Israel, used their international media to propaganda other countries to join and die for jews.

The world banded together to expunge fascism which is a wildly dangerous, regressive and flawed ideology. Fascists are okay with 70 million casualties as a direct result of their actions because they devalue human life. Nazi Germany invaded Poland, triggering british and french declarations of war. Hitler outlined his desire for Lebensraum (living space) in Mein Kampf. The idea that Churchill was paid to create isreal is a conspiracy with no evidence and stems from classic antisemtic tropes. The allies joined the war to stop Nazi aggression, not to save jews. This recycled trope is used by fascists to deflect from their own weakness and failure.

If I ask how many Jews died in WW2 why is that every single brainless idiot can quickly say 6 million

Because it's a documented historical fact. It's based on Nazi documents, accepted at the nuremberg trials and reaffrimed by decades of study and scholarship. It's one of the most well documented genocides in human history.

If I asked how many Russians did the jews kill during the Bolshevek massacres, will you be able to tell me?

Nazi propaganda - some jews were prominent in early soviet leadership, the bolsheviks were multi-ethnic marxists. Stalin was not Jewish, he purged jews from the government and endorsed antisemitic campaigns. The idea that "jews killed millions of russians" is racial essentialisation. Blaming an entire group for the actions of some individuals, textbook racism.

If I ask what books were burned during ww2 will you be able to tell me?

It was the nazis who burned books

works by einstein freud, kafka

marxist literature

liberal and pacifist works

any books that were considered degenerate

Nazis were erasing intellectual and cultural diversity, not the allies or the jews. Finishing with ad hom doesnt strengthen your argument.

Nigger, u started using Anon Babble in 2016.

Casting your pearls among swine?

If they had the correct opinion, they'd be part of the regime and agree with it's propaganda

Wow you're retarded

It always makes me laugh that "anti-fascists" would super support the nazis if this was 1935 and not 2025

youtu.be/3lfczBPS4c8
Down with zionism in though

beanie reddit might be better for you
trannies are received much better there

youtu.be/a8AYHaz6ymM?si=aUiCe2SQcxAgcIj3

Beanie don't be silent :(

God damn Beanie I love you

Nope, you're a newfag larping as an oldfag same as always. Some little stupid nigger faggot, you were probably fucking 3 years old in 2006. Man its fucking sad.

cope harder.

This statement completely outs you as a newfag btw. You didn't even complain about stormfront. 1/10

stormfront doesn't deserve a mention, nazis don't deserve attention or platform. What was wrong with old Anon Babble was bots forcing gets on Anon Babble and an onslaught of newfags that didn't think critically, understand the rules of the website or the boards that they posted on and didn't understand the whole concept of "doing it for the lulz".

In any case you're wrong. Anon Babble has always been sexist, its always been racist, its always been filled with gore, trolling, cheese pizza, silk road ect ect.

doesn't make it right to do any of those things. Why are you talking nostalgically about child porn like its something that Anon Babble should be proud of?

Stop pretending Anon Babble is some virtuous friendly website. It might resemble that more now but Anon Babble was one step away from illegal back in the day.

No, I have experienced Anon Babble at it's absolute worst and I've seen it at it's best too. Hint, racism and nazism was a cancer killing this website and always has been. I've probably been on this website since before you were in diapers. Stop citing the elder magic to me, I was there when it was written. Only weak people stick to weak ideologies or uncultured behaviour. Running around shitting up Anon Babble with "muh jews" and "niggers are responsible for all crime in western society" is a perfect example of the worst part of this website, and like I said earlier in the thread, it's just an incredibly vocal niche minority of shitheads that think they're justified to spew their rhetoric because the pseudoanonymity grants them a shield from consequence. Guaranteed 100% most of these pussies wouldn't stand behind their ideology in real life, and it's fucking pathetic.

Shut the fuck up and go find a chaser on Grindr already

Running around shitting up Anon Babble with "muh jews" and "niggers are responsible for all crime in western society" is a perfect example of the worst part of this website,

But they do nearly 60% of the crime while being only 13% of the population.

vocal niche minority of shitheads that think they're justified to spew their rhetoric because the pseudoanonymity grants them a shield from consequence. Guaranteed 100% most of these pussies wouldn't stand behind their ideology in real life, and it's fucking pathetic

Lmao what could you do about it? Fascist? Beg companies to Fire people? So instead of having a discussion about why your view is correct, you try to ruin someone's life? And you believe you are on the good or right side of history? Don't make me laugh faggot.

conservative incel MRA men many of whom hate jews and are nazis

But I'm none of those things and I'm still miserable and want to kill myself.

many of whom hate jews and are nazis

HMMMMM

Why would this be the case?

HMMMM

Nope, still not seeing it!

I'm blind! I'm blind! I can't see!

(this shit goes back to the 50's, by the way)

That's the thing: Beanie complains about being thrown in the same bag with all the evil jews while throwing men into one bag. She can't realize that lot of jews are hated not because they are jews, but because they are hypocrites like that. And if so many are hypocrites, it makes sense to go by statistics and assume it's the case for most until proven otherwise. It's natural optimization mechanism of our brains.

There were only ever one true genocide and it was the holocaust. There is no genocide in Gaza.

But no, it's the angry incels that are the problem.
Sure.

Here's how Israel's military blockade killed people in the early days of COVID.

This entire time you've only ever referred to jews as a collective and never as individuals.

Even IF you had some smoking gun which could implicate a large number of jews that simply isn't all of them. And I doubt very much that regurgitated nazi conspiracy theories are going to give you even that much.

What am I even supposed to say when I bring up the holocaust and how horrible it is, and its met with nothing but snide laughter from people who don't believe it happened?

So instead of having a discussion about why your view is correct, you try to ruin someone's life?

I wonder how much of a discussion literal nazis had with the people in the camps before they were put into a gas chamber. I wonder how open nazis are to constructive debate that isn't built on centuries or racist conspiracy theories.

"Yes hello HR manager, yeah I know I called Jeremy a k*ke at work, but have you considered JEW BAD???"

Yeah I wonder why a workplace wouldn't wanna deal with that shit.

This one's talking about the time that Israel fired upon a flotilla carrying humanitarian aid.

Here's what the famine situation looked like back in 2016.

And here's all the facts together, so that you know I know my shit!

they do 60 percent of the crime

You're copy-pasting statistics you don't understand from stormfront-tier infographics. Crime stats without socioeconomic context are just weapons for lazy racists. You're not doing analysis, you're doing numerolgy with a swastika

"lmao what could you do about it"

already did. I embarrassed you into silence earlier. Now you're back with a lazy post-hoc cope and an identity crisis. You need Anon Babble anonymity because your idology couldn't survive a single room of real people with real values. You're a keyboard fascist, not a revolutionary - don't kid yourself.

You try to ruin peoples lives

Nobody has to do anything - your beliefs are so toxic they self-destruct. You want to be a martyr, but you're just a clown hwho got a little too comfortable thinking hate speech = free speech with zero blowback. Spoiler: it doesnt.

don't make me laugh faggot

You already did. Thanks for the projection, deflection and recycled talking points. Now go refresh your echo chamber and pretend you won.,

What am I even supposed to say when I bring up the holocaust

Maybe you shouldn't bring it up as some kind of impenetrable shield. And stick with figuring out why it is jews are hated and if there are reasons why jews are hated.

collective and never as individuals.

Because you pilpulling jew. You brought up thr topic of jews and not an individual jew. So the focus is on the trends you share as a people and specifically the ones that disliked. Why are we acting as if stereotypes do not exist?

I wonder how much of a discussion literal nazis had with the people in the camps before they were put into a gas chamber. I wonder how open nazis are to constructive debate that isn't built on centuries or racist conspiracy theories

And this is exactly why you're hated. You want to frame things around the holocaust, for which there are ample questions that could be asked on whether it ever happened at all. Expensive gas, wooden doors, not enough cookies to be baked in the time given etc. My trans brother, I do not want to debate if the holocaust happened or not. You seem to want that. Because all jews use it as some magnificent shield to hide behind.

The HOLOCAUST happened. Now stop being mean to jews while we steal all the land of Palestine and eradicate all of the hospitals hehe.

As I've said before. I'm aware of jewish tricks and I'm sick of them. Since you will not stop using jewish tricks on me, I will now use your own jewish tricks back on you.

Yeah I wonder why a workplace wouldn't wanna deal with that shit

Why is it ok that jews support the genocide of Gaza?

your argument that everyone who's on the right side of an issue must enjoy success and posterity is so blatantly ignorant of the entire history of human thought and progress where virtually every visionary thinker or reformer suffered various kinds of ostracization and imprisonment and many of which died before their ideas became accepted and eventually lauded as correct...

history is written by the victors, you probably think the american confederacy was racist because that's how the victors of the civil war wrote it, and so with all civil wars... if it were so obvious that one side was 'wrong' then there wouldn't have been a civil war in the first place, it's only post hoc, when the ideology of the victor is sufficiently rooted, that we can look back and cast our vain judgement on those who fought and died for their way of life, while we, living in the society of the victor, must go on as slaves.

Crime stats without socioeconomic context

Made up word. You do not want to have this argument with me. I will take you into the deep ocean and leave you there.

Do they commit the vast majority of Violent crime or not? It is a yes or no question.

If socioeconomic factors matter so much, then why do Hispanics who have equal poverty rates as blacks in the US, have roughly about half their violent crime stats?

tl;dr desu - you're not pro palestinian, you're just using palestinian suffering as a blunt object to push your antisemtic fascist agenda. Spamming academic screenshots doesn't make you informed, it makes you look like a propagandist hoping no one reads past the headlines. IF you actually cared about nuance or humanity you'd be fighting for peace, not shitting up threads with pdfs and slurs.

Based Humanity has Declined poster.
Have another article! Just for being good!

Do you believe there is a genocide happening in Gaza or not?

I've read - every single - one of those articles in preparation for a 40-minute seminar I gave at the university-level, discussing the (obvious) genocide in Gaza.

The fact that you think there's any motive besides simple humanitarian concern is a reflection of your foul heart, not mine.

Also, it's not that I "hope no one reads past the headlines."

I'm posting the first page of an academic article because that's where you find the abstract.

Why are you silent on the suffering happening in Gaza?

Jews worship Satan and the coming of the anti christ is the savior in their books lol
Christians held a majority of Palestine before jews came and started killing them off and raping them the remaining Christians in Palestine now have to watch jews burn churches down while retarded American Christians praise Israel

Crime stats without socioeconomic context

Made up word. You do not want to have this argument with me. I will take you into the deep ocean and leave you there.

Socioeconomic context is a made up word? That's your big brain take? Lmao you're already drowning. I mean, the word is bigger than 3 syllables so I can understand why you're struggling with it but yes, context matters.

Yes or no questions don't work when the premise is warped. Crime stats without context = propaganda. If you knew anything about policing intensity, neighbourhood level segregation, historical redlining, sentencing bias or reporting disparities you wouldn't be using "black people = crime" as your mic drop.

Hispanics? Different demographics, immigration patterns, family structures, geographic concentrations, police interaction rates and cultural norms. Try again.

You're not taking anyone to the deep ocean, you can't even swim.

what? Do you think kikes control the main stream media, deciding who's going to be a celebrity? And by doing that they subvert and disrupt society, making it a living hell for their own profit?

I mean, if that was true, you should've been on... well... main stream media, being a celebrity!

Holy shit, sloppiest job ever seen from mossad...

How can u expect any American man to not be antisemitic when jews are the reason circumcision is such a big thing

A few years back I dated a woman whose father, the owner and founder of a successful construction business, was an out and about National Socialist. When he heard I not only believed in the cause, but was directly descended from NSDAP members he shook my hand, slapped me on the back, and cracked open a bottle of Sauvignon Blanc for the three of us to share. Today neither of them are in my life, but my hatred of contemptuous freaks like you, and my belief in European exceptionalism have only grown. I am currently listening to the night-time murmuring of the love of my life, a fellow believer, and smugly reading your drivel.
It is no wonder that extremist possessions attract the dispossessed and dejected, for why would a man that has his bread, circuses, and soma ever need question the state of his world? I found the truth from a time of agony, and humiliation, and through it I rose above. You will never be free like men like me.

a collective and never as individuals

Read Notes on Nationalism by Orwell, you are not going to have good conversation with anybody poisoned by dopamine and irony.

This is a dumb argument when you take into fact that Hispanics are labeled white most of the time to skew crime statistics

Hispanics? Different demographics, immigration patterns, family structures, geographic concentrations.

Explain why these differences cause them to commit less crime.

geographic concentrations

As if they do not exist in the same cities.

police interaction rates

Hmm why would police be more active where criminals are....

Nice cope thread. Unfortunately, antisemitism is not apart of the common western lexicon. The youth don't support you. They view you as genocidal maniacs, and rightfully so. And unlike the pas where you can find another host nation to run to, the Internet has exposed every Jewish crime for 5000 years. It's OVER for you kikes. The Holocaust has become the butt of every joke. Israel will be destroyed in our lifetime, and the world will slaughter every last kike. Then we will finally have peace.

You won't have to worry about jewish persecution in my household, Beanie.

You're presuming all Jews are evil, and that simply isn't true.

Anyone who follows judaism is evil, because it is an evil terrorist religion.

You're presuming all Jews are evil, and that simply isn't true.

Anyone who follows judaism is evil, because it is an evil terrorist religion

So let me get this straight - your worldview is "Judaism is an evil terrorist religion" and somehow that's not bigotry, that's insight? You're not making a moral judgement on religion, you're using religion as a cover for your antisemitism, you're not even subtle about it.

If you actually had a consistent view of religion, you'd be criticizing all of them for tribalism, dogma and historical violence, which would be a valid conversation. But instead, you're singling one group out and pretending it's righteousness.

All organised religion has blood on its hands - Christianity, Islam, Judaism, Hinduism. All have committed atrocities in the name of divine authority. That's the nature of dogma, it hijacks moral clarity with absolute certainty.

Even Buddhism, which I once thought was the outlier, has been co-opted into atrocity in places like Myanmar. No belief system is immune to being twisted into a weapon when it becomes a tool for identity and power.

But your post isn't about that. You don't hate religion, you just needed a reason to say "jews bad" and feel morally justified doing it. That's not philosophical critique, that's just lazy, reheated hate.

Hey, asshole: have you done all the required reading on this subject? Found here:

And many, many more.
You know what they say: there's more grains of sand on the beach than there are reasons to nuke Israel.

Thanks for proving my point. You didn't engage with a single sentence of what I wrote (because you can't). You don't want a discussion about religion or ethics. You want to spam screenshots and act smug while saying genocidal shit like "reasons to nuke Israel" pretending that makes you clever instead of mentally diseased.

Nobody needs to read your stack of pdfs to recognise lazy, ideological hate wrapped in pseudo-academic window dressing. Your posts are a Trojan horse, full of surface level humanitarian concern but carrying a rotten, fascist core. You're not educated, You're not radical. You're just another LARPing bigot hiding behind other people's suffering.

I don't need to blanket criticize every faith that has ever existed, for the sins of all of its members.

Mostly because it's fucking retarded.

But also because there's ONE faith, one people, that eclipses all the others when it comes to mass atrocities.

Is there a genocide happening in Gaza or not? Do you support it?

if it makes you feel better a girl broke my heart and I'm in a lot of emotional pain

Don't insult my intelligence

if you had any you wouldn't be on this site where according to you the vast majority of people are incel mra or whaver dumb word salad you learned yesterday. you are the same as the people you criticize you are not in any way better. if you had any dignity or honor you wouldn't be here yet here you are swimming in the same filth and crying about it. what a fucking retard

They view you as genocidal maniacs

Genocide is bad, surely your worldview offers a better-

the world will slaughter every last k*ke. Then we will finally have peace.

The irony that you're somehow against genocide, but you want to slaughter every last jew?

Since you will not stop using jewish tricks on me, I will now use your own jewish tricks back on you.

So I'm somehow using "jewish tricks", and thats super bad and awful. But you yourself are not above using said "jewish tricks".

I swear If you didn't have hypocritical values you wouldn't have any values at all.

dumb word salad you learned yesterday

Are we anti-learning now? If I learn a new word am I not allowed to use it anon?

what a fucking retard

I guess not because its bad to be stupid according to you. So what do you want from me anon? Am I not allowed to use new words, or arrange them in whatever way I please?

Tell me wise anon, what way should I arrange my sentences to make them easier to read and digest? You seem to appoint yourself the expert on communication and intelligence so lets hear it.

I only respond to things that enrage me

I swear If you didn't have hypocritical values you wouldn't have any values at all

Is a Palestinian holocaust occurring or not? Do you support the genocide of Gaza?

Tell me wise anon, what way should I arrange my sentences to make them easier to read and digest?

Wow, more than zero letters, I'm not going to read it. I don't remember i ordered yappachino

I don't support genocide regardless of the era. I've said this time and time again. But Israel has a right to exist, and to defend itself.

Wow, more than zero letters

Yes? I typed more than zero letters? I don't think they let you send posts that don't have text in them.

I'm not going to read it

Oh... So even though I typed the letters you're not going to bother reading anything I've written. Thanks for letting me know I guess.

I don't remember i ordered yappachino

I sure hope it arrives sometime soon.

You're not gonna win this battle. Antisemitism will keep growing. Accept my sanctuary offer.

But Israel has a right to exist, and to defend itself.

What about Palestinian mothers and babies?
Do they have any rights at all?
Refer to article here, for more details:
It can be found in whichever article brokerage firm you prefer, or Anna's Archive, if you like.

Ignoring this is an acknowledgement of your lack of refutation.

DOT worker here. I have a job that I love, and a reasonably healthy social life. I am not an incel, I abstain from pursuing a relationship because I prefer my own company to others. I have no resentment towards women and minorities. I volunteer my free time to the local animal shelter and peer to peer outreach centers for mental health crisis counseling.

The a good chunk of the anons here are oldfags who outgrew the angst you find on this website, it's just that the crazier anons are much louder than us. By posting a thread clumping everyone on the website together and looking down on them, you are guaranteeing mutual dislike from the entire community.

I know you're going to discredit everything I'm saying and likely insult me, but if you want to prove yourself wrong, go to Anon Babble and see just how many anons devote their time here to helping others. You are intentionally drawing hate to yourself to prove yourself right with heavily biased data.

This site is mostly filled with conservative incel MRA men many

didnt read all that shit tho, why not fuck off to reddit or whatever place you came from?, crystal cafe nigger

Your trip is different from the original beanie. You are an impersonator.

If you get censored it means you're wrong

If you argue with me it means I'm right

If you don't argue with me it means I'm right

Leftists are so fucking deranged it's actually fascinating, your ideology is so shit you're too afraid to post it on Anon Babble

If you get censored it means you're wrong

Hey Anon take a look at this wow is that a picture of your "based and epic" nazis censoring peoples free speech by burning books? Oh shit wow you're a fucking massive hypocrite.

Hey remember when elon banned the word "cis" on twitter? Remember free speech is great, unless you say something that a fascist doesn't agree with.

b-but peelon isn't a fa-

Pic related.

Heres another with his arm fully extended just in case people start coping with:

C-come on guys h-he was just saying my heart goes out to you!

if their worldview was the objectively correct one, they wouldn't be posting it here. They'd be on Fox NEWS or CNN

youtube.com/watch?v=9bFHsd3o1w0

me when i imagine that i'm a fascist billionaire "giving my heart" out to the masses.

But Israel has a right to exist, and to defend itself.

So you believe Palestinians should be genocided and support the holocaust of Gaza?

U STARTED IT!

You're fucking insane and cannot argue in good faith to save your life because the things you believe are indefensible, you didn't even refute my point you just screeched

N-NO U!!!!

In a desperate non-sequitur.

He's so schizophrenic he thinks that's a Nazi salute

You're mentally ill, lmfao

HERE'S ANOTHER POST OF ME BEING MENTALLY ILL!!!!!

Lmfao you're so fucking mad that you lost that you're having a complete mental breakdown.

I guess not because its bad to be stupid according to you. So what do you want from me anon? Am I not allowed to use new words, or arrange them in whatever way I please?

Tell me wise anon, what way should I arrange my sentences to make them easier to read and digest? You seem to appoint yourself the expert on communication and intelligence so lets hear it.

unbelievable someone will type that crap without feeling embarrassed.you're cringy and pathetic. and you deflect the statement made that you're no better than the filth you criticize. so shut the fuck up because you're neither funny nor smart.

black people doing more crime doesn't matter because of these excuses

But Israel has a right to exist, and to defend itself

You realize history didn't start on 7th sept? This whole mess is basically british and jewish fault.

sperg awkwardly "throws heart to the people"

he's hailing hitler

Really? Do you take us for idiots? You can sell this bullshit to retarded, evangelical boomers. Have you ever saw proper roman salute?

You're mentally ill, lmfao

Feel free to explain how its not a nazi salute. I even posted further proof of said salute because I knew you wouldn't believe me.

you're so fucking mad that you lost that you're having a complete mental breakdown.

No, I'm literally just saying the truth. I'm sorry but facts don't care about your feelings.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Balfour_Declaration

palestinian genocide does not give free range to be a racist. Protip: When the result of voting for either side of your two-headed hydra of a government gives the same result for Palestinians anyway, you don't actually live in a democracy. The only difference is the ones who voted collectively decided that a swing to the fascist corner of the top right quadrant was the right move. History will say that it wasn't, but you have bigger fish to fry on your own doorstep before you start worrying about lil ol' Israel, idiot.

Your point will be valid the moment it stops becoming a strawman for anti semetic rhetoric

Why do you believe it's ok to genocide Palestine?

Feel free to explain how its not a nazi salute

He said, word for word, "my heart goes out to you" and then gestured from his chest to the crowd you seething schizophrenic, lmfao

My schizophrenic hallucinations that not even the ADL went along with is the truth

What's it like because legitimately mentally ill?

Have you ever saw proper roman salute?

no one has, on account of the roman empire falling 1600 years ago. Neocon fascists are fucking braindead. They don't get much practice using their brain outside their little echochambers.

Funny how every neofascist LARPer wants to cosplay as Caesar but can't string a coherent sentence together. You don't have a political movement - you have a nostalgia cult built on memes and historical illiteracy. Keep saluting shadows, retard.

I don't know what it looks like but you're still a fascist because uuuuuhhhhh

Lmfao you're so fucking mad it's hysterical, I can hear your fat fingers mashing the keyboard to type out the most impotent insults you can cook up through the screen.

Leftist screeching about echo chambers

Remember when you all literally shit your pants and cried because you couldn't ban anyone you wanted off of shitter anymore after Elon bought it? If you self reflected for a single second it would kill you.

I never said that, you illiterate monkey.

But thanks for proving my point - nuance escapes you entirely. you're not here to understand, you're here to flatten every take into cartoon villainy so you can keep frothing at imaginary enemies. There's no point trying to talk with someone who's allergic to thinking.

Why do you believe Palestine doesn't deserve to exist? Why do believe Gaza should be holocausted?

sure is stormfront in here. Be under no illusion, this thread is a fucking dumpster fire, as expected from the start. This is why I said you need to create something in the real world, let the LARPers have their online safe space.

And I know what your counter point is. Don't insult my intelligence by presuming that I wouldn't know your reply.

So you already knew pre-cognitively that I was going to say I'm volcel don't care about MRA's and I'm content with my own misery and as a NEET I'm doing my part by not spreading said misery. Ok there champ, keep believing you can read minds.

Others who hold my opinion are normal and successful.

Ah, so your sophistry is the RIGHT sophistry. Gotcha. Can't possibly handle other worldviews counter to your own. They are just evil by nature huh?

TL;DR, gr8 b8 m8 I r8 it 14/88. All my Niggas Nazis Heil Hitler!

twitter.com/TheRISEofROD/status/1926332262896828744?t=E3NY-8-EiKpx4mtduLOodg&s=19

So you dropped your influencer handle in a thread full of open Holocaust denial, racial slurs and Nazi Screeching. That's not edgy, thats strategic suicide. Even if it's not your real name, you just permanently tied your "brand" to the worst ideological sewer on the internet. Congrats. Every tweet, every follower, every future collab, all archived next to Anon Babble anons LARPing about genocide. You're not a movement leader, you're not ubilding anything. You're just the latest fascist cosplayer too desperate for attenteion to realise you gave up your mask for free.

Ace work doxxing yourself chief. Thanks for confirming the stormfront op.

twitter.com/essexcannaclub/status/1923180916316278978?t=hr5vpqqs6xKPt5ocJpNaOA&s=19

twitter.com/Jay932007485449/status/1926387784928862579?t=SIdiMGrOparKq03qYp04Aw&s=19

God damn you glowkarens are cringe

Bro you're spamming twitter links and galling people "glowkarens" because you got humiliated and can't cope. We know it's you. The flailing is louder than your posts.

You dropped your @, got cooked, and now you're trying to drown the thread in noise. Archive's already got your L. Sit with it.

How do you explain the dirt poorest whites having lower crime rates in virtually every category than the richest blacks. Are you somehow going to argue that these dirt poor whites have greater access to anything than a state-favored group, blacks, that get affirmative action and corporations tripping over themselves to hire them and exclude white men?

Systemic racism. Originally.

Yup, you nailed it.

The people that stole from me were ALWAYS white. And I had black friends growing up. The only people that made my life worse were whites.

You can't just throw a few handful of support programs for black people and magically expect to fix the generational poverty that affects black communities. And its almost funnny in a way because the only reason those black people are even here is because whitey literally ENSLAVED them.

And now you want to send them all back. I dunno, just seems really cruel and selfish to not look after them after all this time. But what do I know, I'm just some "woke" lefty right?

They're even making up stories of having black friends

You are utterly deranged, it's fascinating.

I'm being a hundred percent serious with you. And the hilarious circumstances that we met under are even more unbelievable.

Still. They were some defining early memories for me. Even now... I still remember those innocent summer days.

NTA, but many other races have experienced systematic racism, oppression, violence, and even genocide without turning into high-crime minorities. Jews are the most prominent example of this.

But let change it up a bit. Blacks, provably, commit more crime. We agree on this fact. Your anecdotes are discarded. Let's analyze the possibilities:

1. There is no genetic basis for the discrepancy between black crime and the crimes of other oppressed minorities.

If this is the case, the plain fact is that blacks commit more crime. Just as we say pathologize whites for racism however the enviroment contributed it this, pathologization of blacks is just as reasonable. Whites are much more likely to be victimized by an interracial crime than to commit it (if you would like, I can begin citing every fact I state, but I think you already agree) and the victimization of whites may be a social contributor to some things we see as white-crimes, like racist crime or hate killings. Instead of addressing these systematic problems that might contribute to racism (white victimization), we treat white racists as pathological elements and so seek to penalize them. In the same way, whatever environmental factors cause blacks to be criminal may be tackled, but the blacks themselves are pathological and the punishments are justified regardless of why they are as they are. We cannot go back in time to fix them, we must tackle the problem as it is.

2. There is a genetic basis, however small, for the difference in behavior.

This is most likely, whatever you feel about it. As I said, many peoples around the world (and my ownI am not white) have experienced oppression and genocide. Not all of them became toxic and pathological elements within their host cultures, and their own. There significant evidence for a genetic basis to this difference. The reason I say this is because you cannot simply say "systemic oppression" whenever the result of a study is not as you want it to be.

denial

rage

reframing (you are here)

Projection/identity swap

silence/thread evacuation (you are slowly travelling here)

Proceed with caution anon, we know who you are. We know what you are for that matter.

Pic unrelated, but shit was so cash.

"Systemic racism" serves as a pseudoscientific dark matter-like sociological construct which is then used to explain why data does not align with an expected dogmatic axiom. In this case, that axiom is that all races must of necessity behave exactly the same, and that all people are a "tabula rasa"--again, a largely discredited idea--upon which social norms and environment completely determines ones behavior. In theory, this may be reasonable. Unfortunately, the only method through which we test that systemic racism exists is simply that the data is not as we would wish for it to be. This is the basis for all pseudoscience, and it is the reality for claims of systemic biases of this sort.

In practice, it is not scientific. The reason it cannot work and may be harmful is that if there is a discrepancy that is biological--which is completely reasonable--then our denial of it based on dogmatic beliefs (like the fundamental biological parity of all people) will prevent us from seeking solutions that take into account the natural differences between people and races.

Before going further, just state what you believe and why you believe it. I'm not from this discussion, so we may end up arguing entirely different, irrelevant points.
Is this about some discors clique drama? If you are online for too long then you might assume random posters are people you know, or you may overestimate the importance of random tripcode users. I know beanie just because I see him in this thread and every once in a while, aside from him and mike, no one else.

The more relevant question is why you're arguing with the mentally ill and the deranged if you once had a functional normie life.
Arguing seriously on the internet is cancer, you can't use rational logic to convince the irrational. And flexing on the stupid does get old after a while, right?

tl;dr

You're not being scientific, you're dressing up racist determinism in thesaurus.com vocabulary. Systemic racism is backed by decades of research. You deny it not because the evidence isn't there, but because it threatens your worldview, You're not analysing disparities, you're justifying them.

"Some races are just naturally worse" isn't science, it's fascism with footnotes.

Systemic racism is backed by decades of research. You deny it not because the evidence isn't there,

No it is not. Systemic bias is evidenced by implications from data, like the difference in incarceration rates or wrongful arrest rates between races. Systemic bias is not a proven construct as you think it is.

If you think I was being overly verbose, point to the specific instances or use ChatGPT as a substitute for your low literacy level. I apologize that not everything can be put into a meatgrinder for the uneducated and illiterate for a thirty second tiktok.

"Systemic racism" serves as a pseudoscientific dark matter-like sociological construct which is then used to explain why data does not align with an expected dogmatic axiom.

Pseudoscientific

Use is self-evident

Dark matter

I was on the fence about its usage. This is the closest to an example of a pseudointellectual usage as I am not a physicist, but its usage within physics (as a stand-in to describe why mathematical models have discrepancies from expected outcomes) is accurate. Dark matter itself is theoretical, and may be some other phenomenon entirely, the name "dark matter" is a stand-in for an as-yet understood mechanism, much like systemic racism. The "systemic racism" can be perfectly substituted for biological difference with no change to the model itself, but this is refused because of

Dogmatic axiom

Dogma is

A doctrine or a corpus of doctrines relating to matters such as morality and faith, set forth in an authoritative manner by a religion.

or

A principle or statement of ideas, or a group of such principles or statements, especially when considered to be authoritative or accepted uncritically.

The biological parity of races is one axiom

A self-evident or universally recognized truth; a maxim.

An established rule, principle, or law.

A self-evident principle or one that is accepted as true without proof as the basis for argument; a postulate.

Reminder Beanie is a baiting tranny and this goes for any other "fembot" on here

b-but you replied

the creature wants anger and paragraphs of effort posts in vain, this will be my only post.

Other words like "tabula rasa" are very obvious in context, and the term is always brought up in these contexts. But the evidence is very tenuous for systemic oppression of african americans. Once you say "systemic oppression isn't real" the conclusion is obvious and very unsavory. Only one other possibility can fill the space.

Sorry if it's too verbose. If it were any less, then it would invite too many misunderstandings. But I'm open to reason as well as clarifying any point.

I think Beanie is super sweet.

You've spent hours across multiple threads and boards trying to unfuck your own ego after getting dismantled in front of everyone and it shows.

You ragebaited, you humiliation-LARPed. You self-posted your influencer handle into a nazi-infested thread like it was going to earn you clout, and then you got publicly humiliated and archived forever alongside a pile of slurs, hitler memes and your own idological shit stains.

And now, here you are again - not defending your ideas, not correcting anyone else's. Just surgically dissecting your own bullshit, word by word, like that'll make it sound less racist. As if defining "dogma" and "dark matter" at length somehow erases the part where you said Black people are criminals because they're black.
You're not a philosopher, you're not a contrarian genius., You're a loser who's trying to drown his original humiliation under a mountain of verbosity becvause you can't handle the fact that a random anon bodybagged your ideology in 3 sentences and moved on.
This isn't intellectualism. It's coping dressed in borrowed words. And everyone watching knows exactly who you are - the guy who self doxxed, got wrecked and now desperately wants the board to forget.

Too bad. The thread is archived. Your handle's in it. And this is your "legacy". A fascist who lost an argument and tried to escape by defining "axiom". You're not erasing what happened. You're just making it easier to quote.

Sit with it.

What specific instance are you talking about and can you link it? I'm just curious. I have argued with anons before but nothing like this I remember.
Whichever specific person you're talking about is not me.

Again, you have not really argued against the point, all you've done is said simple words like "axiom" are too hard to read.

Also not to offend you, but whether a post is made by your discord friend/enemy doesn't really matter. If you can't think of a reply it means you're either wrong or should critically examine your own beliefs.

see^

denial

rage

reframing (you have moved from here)

Projection/identity swap (you are now here)

silence/thread evacuation (you are slowly travelling here)

Seethe idiot, it's completely obvious.

I get it, you're really angry and possibly schizophrenic. Just bodybag what I said in 3 sentences if you're educated and knowledgable on the topic like you did with whatever anon. If he was that stupid then it should be easy for you.

Another successful troll thread by beanie. Robots fall for it every time.

You already lost. This isn't a debate - it's post-mortem twitching. Three sentences won't bury you any deeper. You're already archived.

Okay? I'm not sure if you're trying to defend your ego from a perceived threat (there's really none, you haven't made your reply yet) or if you're literally having an episode of delusion, but no one has replied to my posts yet besides you:
And you didn't really have anything to say besides a moral complaint, ad hominem, and "tl;dr".

You need to stop being terminally online.

This site is mostly filled with conservative incel MRA men many of whom hate jews and are nazis

Has never visited Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, Anon Babble, or literally any regular board on this site

Has only visited this cesspit of a board

The more relevant question is why you're arguing with the mentally ill and the deranged if you once had a functional normie life.

Because I genuinely believe I'm changing lives, and changing the world.

People think Anon Babble is a forgone conclusion. But what if... It wasn't?

Think about it, every day people come in and out of Anon Babble. We like to think of Anon Babble as a static unchanging entity, but I don't think it is. We're constantly seeing the old guard leave. And new people come in to fill the gaps.

And the ones who stay, they've even said they've changed their minds from the old days when they were edgelords. Anon Babble is NOT a conservative holdout. I think Anon Babble is all about jokes, and contrarianism.

Think about it, when we have democratic presidents, its contrarian to be a right wing edgelord. But ever since Trump took office, guess what we've seen? Its not more right wing posts, its actually more left wing posts.

Theres fertile ground here. And while yes, for now the majority are conservative. I think with time that's bound to change. As the tariff's effects roll in, and the true face of the conservative administration becomes clear. Keep your eyes peeled. Because there may be a blue wave.

if their worldview was the objectively correct one, they wouldn't be posting it here. They'd be on Fox NEWS or CNN, they'd be some big time political streamer.

Do you actually believe everything on mainstream media is true and not curated by people with biases and agendas?

How's your love life, brainiac?

81273310

imagine trying to gaslight someone mid-thread while leaking your own sock like a bustegd valve. Enjoy the archive, champ.

Who are you? Why are you so judgy on Anon Babble of all places?

Everything I said in the OP remains true. There are an overwhelming number of people who have extremist edgelord opinions. I don't think I'm wrong about that.

However, I don't browse all boards, so I don't think I have all the info.

It obviously is. But the idea is that with such an overwhelming current majority of far-right nutjobs that doesn't it seem strange that these more extreme ideas aren't getting play?

And when they do, its usually through freak cases like Kanye, Andrew Tate, or Elon?

I've said it before, they're successful, but immoral. Nobody WANTS to be immoral, people claim that they're amoral, and that they don't care about stuff like that. But I think this board in particular actually does care about morals.

Why are you so judgy on Anon Babble of all places?

Because it resonates with people. We're coming up on 200 replies. If what I said wasn't getting under peoples skin, they wouldn't have even thrown a single (you) my way.

They're outraged, and upset, because they know absolutely every single word that I've said is the truth, and it eats them up inside.

Oh you started a flame war. I kneel, crystal castles queen

That's definitely very delusional and narcissistic. Can you also reply to posts that refute yours or are you going to ignore anything that challenges your worldview?

I love you Beanie I've made a thread about you.

You're right about 90% of this except hating Jews is actually the correct position these days as they are actively perpetrating a genocide against another ethnic group. If you don't hate Jews in 2025 you're the racist chud.

Shut up and become my buttslut anal queen.

You need a fat cock to gape your asshole.

desu beanie, a fire only needs a couple of logs thrown on it to keep going. You lit it, a couple of fascist chuds tried to derail it, one guy went off the rails so hard he started rageposting on like 3 other boards at the same time including 4 or 5 (maybe more) bait and slide threads here on this board, and you get to claim the moral highground. High tier trolling.

That's definitely very delusional and narcissistic

We live in a time where delusional narcissists are on top of the world. So I think theres a good chance I may be successful.

Can you also reply to posts that refute yours or are you going to ignore anything that challenges your worldview?

Which post specifically should I reply to?

Thank you anon. You are incredibly based. And I would definitely give you a hug if I could.

Hating jews has always been wrong. Again, for now we're living in a time where a great majority of these chuds occupy the board. But I'm looking to change that by continually calling them out.

Thank you friend. I do try I suppose.

THE LOG POSTER HAS ESCAVED Anon Babble AND HAS INFILTRATED Anon Babble!
DO NOT ENGAGE. I REPEAT, DO NOT ENGAGE WITH ANDY SIXX'S LOGS

the books they burned: tranny research

Oh

I have a couple of questions Beanie. How old are you and which country do you live in?
And do you need an Anon Babble bf?

The OP is a seething jewish tranny, lmao

Which post specifically should I reply to?

These two:
Earlier I posted but for some reason you thought the image was pro-Nazi. I have no idea how you got that inference when the post was to explain that ideological dominance does not evidence correctness. For example, there was a time when germ theory was an unhinged conspiracy, or when liberal enlightenment was extremist. In Nazi germany, eugenics and racial science was unquestionable, but that did not in and of itself make it correct.

For the scope of the other two, we are only discussing systemic racism.

I don't really have a problem with beanie. She's fighting a boogeyman that only exists in these places of the internet to troll, and not troll at the same time. It's like an illusion people can choose to wear or not, it all depends on how the person reacts. To be fair I think you're underestimating the amount of time some of these losers can take out of their lives to ruin yours. Good luck trying to be hero fighting anonymous people online.

Fuck off, what does it matter that she's Jewish? Also she's not a tranny (and I wouldn't care if she was, so long as she was cute)

OP is a fat brown beaner, potentially a tranny

crying about le chuds, antisemites, and nazis

is jewish

"Why does it matter they're jewish"

Because we should judge a post by its quality, not the identity of the retarded poster.

Usa, I'm above 30. And I have considered getting a partner many times. Its simply a matter of finding the right partner for me.

There do be a lot of text here. But I'll reply to what I THINK could be the point of a few of those at least.

You're claiming that at least for black people the data differences suggest that they're more likely to commit crime and that mere economic circumstance is simply not enough of a mitigating factor to explain it away.

I'll engage with it as a hypothetical. Lets presume for a moment its true. Do you really think the propagation of that data that one race is inherently more prone to crime, even if true would be handled with any sense of delicacy? Or would the world devolve into madness and chaos? If you could tell them this truth, would they even believe you?

I think even presuming everything to be true. Its best not to stare into the abyss of our pre-determined genetic race differences and work to overcome our limitations overall without validating the most horrible and evil racist groups on the planet.

there is no sense of nuance with someone with this kind of rhetoric, let alone someone that sockpuppeted in his own execution thread.

As much as what you're doing is noble, you can't argue in good faith with fascists and nazis.

'll engage with it as a hypothetical. Lets presume for a moment its true. Do you really think the propagation of that data that one race is inherently more prone to crime, even if true would be handled with any sense of delicacy? Or would the world devolve into madness and chaos?

Oh I see. You're right in this regard. If racial science is allowed, then it would be difficult or impossible to prevent Nazi-like legislation farther down the line. In that case, you might actually be a lot smarter and more educated then I thought at first. The thing is that there already is a sort of undercurrent of belief (in academia) that there is some sort of racial genetic disparity, but for the reason you said it is not really discussed. It's like a pandora's box that could unravel most liberal values, if only because it would justify almost every illiberal idea.

I think even presuming everything to be true. Its best not to stare into the abyss of our pre-determined genetic race differences and work to overcome our limitations

I have spoken to a lot of people with this same belief even if they very carefully acknowledge that the evidence of genetic disparity is strong. This is why evidence that directly tries to examine genetic disparity is so heavily frowned upon, and why there really are no studies that set out to tease out this variable.
But in my opinion, it is useless to fight reality because it will catch up eventually, and the things we must do to preserve this lie will do more harm than good.

But it also means that neither of us have anything to discuss, because your motive isn't truth, but consideration for ethics. Since you acknowledge it, there is nothing I can do nor criticize this believe, since it is explicit and not implicit.

Ethics is when you suppress inconvenient data that contradicts the narrative and then you let your corollary assumptions which are falsified by the data you suppressed be what determines policy. This is ethical because it just is ok.

Is your sole function to simp on an anonymous imageboard?

Because I genuinely believe I'm changing lives, and changing the world

Oh Beanie. You are so charmingly dumb and delusional and beautiful. What you're doing is basically smashing your head into a lightpost hoping it will somehow magically turn on. While I respect your sincerity and the world does needs light, I have my doubts about what your methods will accomplish in practice or what happiness it may bring to your life, as your heartfelt cry for human decency sinks into a morass on hentai ahegao and tranny porn.
Well, vaya con dios. I'll be there somewhere in the real world to scrape you off the ground if you need it. If we never meet? Make sure you unplug when you need to. Don't fry your loveable little foid brain, be kind to yourself too.

NTA, that's my sole purpose. Simping is good for the soul in small doses. Don't take out your credit card though, ahem.

They did the same thing before ww2.

Systemic racism. Originally

black people commit more crimes because racism forces them too

twitter.com/LetsGoBrando45/status/1926331968624509290?t=3ImjOCE6yp1hoUXJ66yBmQ&s=19

Uhh, have you heard of STEREOTYPE THREAT, Chud? This magical thinking concept that comes from the finest minds of ACADEMIA? Didn't think so. Get EDUCATED.

Low-watt alt-right types are so fucking stupid they're still sucking down White Russian propaganda from 1919.
Most of the problems with Israel stem from the British Empire btw. Scratch half the simmering national conflicts around the world, and you'll find some British wanker basically set the stage for it.

Ethics is when you suppress inconvenient data that contradicts the narrative

What the fuck are you talking about. This is so brashly wrong that I worry about you.

Ethics in this case is realizing that data doesn't exist in a vacuum. Data isn't truly neutral because people are not truly neutral.

Anon... I need you to internalize some things, and I need you to listen with your whole mind wide open. Theres a reason we put warning labels on medicine. Theres a reason we safety proof areas. And there is a fucking reason that the minute we legalized all the drugs in Oregon that it turned into fucking FALLOUT.

The general public is stupid, shortsighted, and they love their treats. They love fast food, and many of them are very fat and instant-reward brained.

You have in this case VERY sensitive data. That very reactive stupid people are not going to react well to. You have an ethical responsibility to handle that data with care. Again, even if that data existed and were true, we would not be living in a utopia if you put that shit out there. Don't be a fucking moron. You would enable the most unstable fascist dictatorships to rise up and tear down our institutions.

Also, imagine for a minute being born black. And you were to hear that yes, you were born genetically inferior. Imagine what that would even feel like, imagine if you had to live knowing that whitey would always be better than you no matter what.

Ethics is the consideration of feelings, AND facts, putting that out there would end polite society as we know it.

genetics isn't real

let's lie to everyone and keep pretending all people are exactly the same

except jews. we are different and deserve our own Ethnostate because we are God's Chosen, even though we killed Jesus.

BTW do not ask us where we believe Jesus is lmao

twitter.com/BFirstParty/status/1842188006267982008?t=57fbXlK6qRwcLtf6PqXRfQ&s=19

twitter.com/dom_lucre/status/1617720119937097729?t=8p0O-LICy0Bor441SJ6D2A&s=19

Read I trust that when you read my reasoning you'll come to the realization that this isn't some kind of mindless woke pandering or whatever right-wing brainrot you've got tumbling around up there.

Niggers commit similar amounts of crime in places you can't blame redlining and other copes and buzzwords for, such as Canada and European countries which historically had few to no blacks and none of those American copes to fall back on. In fact it was so bad in Canada when a Toronto detective published the data in the 1980s that the government began hiding this data from the public. But then they continued making policy based on the ideas of the blank slate and muh systemic racisms and the only possible explanation for any disparities being evil white and other gibberish while hiding the data. Very ethical. You need to kill yourself tranny.

I disagree with Beanie. The lie is causing more problems than it is fixing. But what can I say? Leftists believe in this as dogma. When one believes religious dogma implicitly, you can argue to try to eliminate the dogma, but when it is explicit then there is nothing to say. They do not believe it out of ignorance, but consideration for ideology and morals, and when it is a moral issue, it cannot be shaken.

Why is it that the 5 cities in North America with the largest black populations, have higher violent crime than the the 5 cities with lowest percentage of blacks?

What does your farts smell like beansama?

Do you honestly think that what you're doing can't be seen through? Textbook fascist rhetoric in action:

introduce controversial premise as "just facts"

"I'm just presenting data. Why are you afraid of the truth?" - normalises dehumanising claims by wrapping them in objectivity

frame opposition as emotional, irrational, or cowardly

"You only care about ethics, not truth"
sets up a false dichotomy between reason (fascist) and emotion (liberal)

act persecuted for daring to speak the truth

"It's dangerous to even talk about this, thats how you know it's real" invokes martyrdom complex to gain sympathy

suggest that hiding the "truth" is more dangerous than the harm caused by spreading it

"reality will catch up - suppressing it does more harm than good"
a justification for unleashing violent or discriminatory policies under the guise of "long-term necessity."

exit the conversation smugly

"We just operate from different motives - mine is truth, yours is ethics"
refuses rebuttal by claiming higher moral ground - textbook intellectual fascism.

The core trick - smuggle idology under teh guise of neutrality. Present racist pseudoscience as apolitical data, then bypass moral scrutiny and recenter the discussion around "who's brave enough to face the truth" subtly posturing themselves as the hero for having horrible opinions.

Fuck, and I mean this as powerfully as I can, you.

>introduce controversial premise as "just facts"

Thinking that wether something is controversial or not has anything to do with whether it's factual is peak derangement, I mean you are genuinely just an insane person you understand that?

No you see it's PROBLEMATIC so it can't be true. You're dealing with a 420 IQ giga-intellectual here. You can't ever talk about reality because it might lead to policy where people like you don't have to live in a racial jungle and get randomly robbed, raped and murdered and then have bourgeoise gated community shitheads like this say you probably deserved it for existing while white.

what type of crime you stupid nigger, and I mean this in the Anon Babble context where it denigrates your personality as unintelliggent regardless of race.

Is it

gun related crime?

Gee whiz anon, you live in a country where everyone has a god given right to have access to a gun
is it

black on white crime

Gee whiz anon, sounds like a minority might be being oppressed in certain cities, but let's not talk about the nuance in regards to that.

Is it

murder

drugs

larceny

white collar

misdemeanour

corporate/white collar

What kind of crime are you fucking talking about you stupid cunt.

You can't just throw a few handful of support programs for black people and magically expect to fix the generational poverty that affects black communities

But then why is it the same in Canada or London, or any place with lots of blacks? Anywhere in the world where there are lots of blacks it becomes extremely violent.

Let me state this as clearly as I can: I am far-right. This is obvious by my direct opposition to liberal values. I think Beanie didn't bother to address this because it was obvious and not relevant to our points.

None of what you said is a refutation, just petty moral gripes. But if you want to know, I also have ethical, dogmatic beliefs. As a human, there is no escaping this. This is why they didn't feel the need to continue, because we both acknowledged that our differences were purely ideological, leaving no room for argument.

You don't care about black/brown people, and you want them removed/killed or sent back to africa or wherever they came from.

Or you believe that they shouldn't be given any help or assistance.

Because either of these outcomes is inhumane and lacks humanity for these people. And yes they are people. They have thoughts and feelings just like you. They're not some mindless collective of rapists and murderers. They have thoughts and feelings.

Why would I assume this? The first word you typed was a racial slur. But feel free to prove me wrong.

The lie is causing more problems than it is fixing.

There is no lie, again, everything I said was under the context of a hypothetical.

Leftists believe in this as dogma

Holy fuck. You didn't actually type this did you?
....
Dude, the people in your movement all wear the same fucking hat. Modern rightists exist in the most dogmatic cult like state that has existed for some fucking time.

Do you not have anything else to do than argue with retarded strangers on the internet time and time again? How can an adult be this committed to such a time wasting and infuriating activity? Please tell me you have a few hobbies besides this.

And now you want to send them all back. I dunno

NOW

Lincoln wanted to send them all back after the Civil War, which he started and WAR CRIMED his own countrymen, but the jews killed him after he talked bad about the banks.

Beanie! Are your farts stinky?

How can an adult be this committed to such a time wasting and infuriating activity?

Patience, lots and lots of patience.

Please tell me you have a few hobbies besides this.

I mean, I play my PS4 sometimes.

Holy fuck. You didn't actually type this did you?

....

Dude, the people in your movement all wear the same fucking hat. Modern rightists exist in the most dogmatic cult like state that has existed for some fucking time.

Oh. Yes, you believe in it as dogma. I was hoping it was a rational choice. Dogmas are the things we believe but allow no room for criticism. For example, I believe that raping children is always bad, and no evidence would ever dissuade me from this belief. If research were to prove that it did not harm children given some specific environment, I would still refuse it. I would obstruct the evidence if necessary, so that society aligns with how I wish to see it. It is dogma.

You stated, hypothetically, that if there was genetic disparity, it should be hidden. This means your fundamental belief in genetic disparity is dogma. You believe it by necessity.

Dogma is not inherently bad. Dogma is only bad when it disagrees with your own.

You're not just "ideologically different," you're defending fascist thought patterns and pretending they're unavoidable consequences of 'truth". What I laid out wasn't a moral gripe - it was a forensic breakdown of your rhetorical strategy. You weren't debating, you were laundering ideology through pseudo-logic and hoping no one would track the thread. But I did. Now you're trying to wrap it all in "agree to disagree" because you can't walk it back or defend it. You didn't concede ethics, you lost credibility. Sit with it.

Stop writing ChatGPT playground criticisms. Contribute something original or go back to jerking off to anime.

Anon I don't know what your politics are. I just assume for all far righties they want every person browner than sour cream dead on the pavement and every jew to meet the same fate.

But even if your precious day of the rope came, you would not be happy. Theres a reason the whole "billions must die" chud meme is mocked. Its a fucking stupid ideology that solves fucking nothing.

Anon Babble is just where all the unfashionable worldviews end up. It has nothing to do with the validity of the worldviews, except that morality corrilates with fashion on a blue moon.

Remember that Fox News supported Trump. They pedal whatever is convenient to their side. Do you suddenly think Trump is valid and correct now? Just because people are "successful" who believed in MAGA? Probably not, given your worldview, so why are we using popularity and presence in the mainstream as a testiment to objective correctness? Are you really that stupid?

I care about mens rights, but I'm progressive. The patriarchy was built by men for women and against the other 80% of men. I think it's stupid people want things to go back. A man's whole existence shouldn't be built around compensating for the fact that he contributes maybe 15 minutes to the reproductive process. Woman comes from woman. Man comes from woman and never recovers from that fact. Society is all a cope.

I have been seeing this foid ranting for a year already. The fact that she thinks she is doing something is laughable, all the replies are shitting on you lmao. Stupid bitch probably is unemployed, no person with a job will be so chronically online.

I have been seeing this foid ranting for a year already

Wow, sounds like you spend a lot of time watching what I do. Nice to have a superfan in the chat.

no person with a job will be so chronically online.

Oh the irony.

The fact that she thinks she is doing something is laughable

You're laughing at me for doing something. I laugh at you because you do nothing. We are not the same.

all the replies are shitting on you lmao

Oh are they? Thanks, I didn't notice. Glad you were such a super-fan you were able to point it out to me almost 250 posts in.

Stupid bitch probably is unemployed

I actually do have a job.

Funny thing about what you just said "if I believe something strongly enough, I'll suppress truth and evidence to preserve it". You know who else says that? Islamic fundamentalists justifying marrying 9 year olds. You're not brave for admitting you'd protect your dogma, you're just the same kind of idological zealot in a different uniform

For example, I believe that raping children is always bad, and no evidence would ever dissuade me from this belief

You said leftists are dogmatic, but then admitted you'd suppress truth to preserve your worldview. That's not a dunk, that's a confession. The only difference between your reasoning and theocrats justifying child brides is the hat you wear.

You're actually saying

dogma is only bad when it disagrees with your own

everyone's worldview is dogmatic so mine's just as valid

What you're doing is moral relativism, masquerading as objectivity, ironically it's a hugely liberal position. You're so fucking stupid mate.

What does beanie work with?

Start being nice in Beanie's threads

Beanie stops responding

Alright, I'm reverting back to my misogynist state.

Funny thing about what you just said "if I believe something strongly enough, I'll suppress truth and evidence to preserve it". You know who else says that? Islamic fundamentalists justifying marrying 9 year olds. You're not brave for admitting you'd protect your dogma, you're just the same kind of idological zealot in a different uniform

I know you're trying really hard to simp for a tripcode anon that will never meet you, but this is exactly what Beanie implied:

Do you really think the propagation of that data that one race is inherently more prone to crime, even if true would be handled with any sense of delicacy? Or would the world devolve into madness and chaos? If you could tell them this truth, would they even believe you?

I think even presuming everything to be true. Its best not to stare into the abyss of our pre-determined genetic race differences and work to overcome our limitations overall without validating the most horrible and evil racist groups on the planet.

The rest of your post is nonsense. You're like the slow fat kid on the playground who always says

Yeah!

To everything his smarter friends say. Just be quiet while someone above room temperature IQ is speaking.

??? I've been responding to people pretty consistently? Where was your post? I'll reply to it just chill out

Shut the fuck up bitch kys

Come on anon don't be that way. Just point out which post it is and I'll give you a (you). Don't be salty, come on.

Hating jews has always been wrong

You trans mutated freak. Why the hell do you think HADRIAN wiped you all out? Do you think it was for zero reason?

Beanie you're fighting the good fight but you really shouldn't bother. Rightoids are subhumans who reject reality when it doesn't agree with their beliefs. You can prove them wrong beyond all doubt and they'll pretend the conversation never happened.

Are you genuinely retarded or something, youre not going to achieve shit here. Youre wasting your life away seething on some irrelevant forum. Stupid bitch.

Pretty sure it's this guy since you haven't given him a (you) all thread:
It's obvious he really, really likes you and needs some validation.

You will never be a woman. You have facial hair and a male skeleton.

KILL ALL FAGGOTS BEHEAD ALL FAGGOTS THROW FAGGOTS OFF CLIFFS CURBSTOMP FAGGOTS TORTURE FAGGOTS TO DEATH. TOTAL FAGGOT DEATH.

Beanie you're fighting the good fight but you really shouldn't bother. Rightoids are subhumans who reject reality when it doesn't agree with their beliefs. You can prove them wrong beyond all doubt and they'll pretend the conversation never happened.

Fuck, thats true. Its all true. Damn it. Yeah... Maybe I should take a step back from this.

Thanks anon.

I mean if he is that guy he's genuinely fucking based.

Like I always appreciate any help I can get. If he wants a (you) on any specific post he can ask and I'll try to write a thoughtful reply.

That motherfucker is clearly brown and will be a school shooter. You can tell they're insane.

You should take a step off a cliff you worthless fucking whore. kys you ugly expired bitch.

You can tell they're insane

Well, if they're any of these recent posts yeah maybe they are if they can just flip to this other mindset on a whim like that.

twitter.com/ChrisTigani/status/1752507729002823700?t=6E1VMWkM4ccX6N_Rylm_lQ&s=19

I don't think that sort of obsessiveness and desire for validation is a school shooter trait (?) but he does seem like he'd stalk and kill you if you don't acknowledge him.

Give him some (you)s for being a good boy.

I am all that but I have like a dozen girls in my dms lmao and im not shy about my beliefs.

You don't care about black/brown people, and you want them removed/killed or sent back to africa or wherever they came from

Faggot. Who cares. Stop doing jew tricks and respond to what was given. Instead of reframing it as something else. This is why people hate jews. Blacks doing crime is why people hate blacks.

Seething this hard just makes you look deranged. You've clearly lost the argument, because your comments have devolved into psychotic ranting.

You are a fucking retard that does nothing but constant strawmans.

Imagine being a simp cuck for an e whore you bitchass faggot. Kys nigger.

Kek, it's one of beanie's desperate simps that went tardrage because she didn't acknowledge him for simping for her:

You should realize that it's a man.

Beanie, I don't need a (you). I'm here to get my kicks by brutally exposing idiot fascists one by one. And it's been a fun thread, honestly, but the constant deflection, circular logic, fundamental misunderstanding of their own positions gets kind of tiring.

Personally, I think you created an opportunity for lulz, and that's in the spirit of what Anon Babble actually is. For the record, it's not really a place for these types to congregate and shit/piss all over to mark their territory, but that doesn't stop them from trying.

As you said earlier, it's more of a contrarian haven where people score points by being against the grain. It gives an excuse for extremist ideology to be platformed and discussed, but when held up to scrutiny, most extremist ideology fails to address nuance with shady tactics like ad-hom, strawmanning, intellectual dishonesty and plain stupidity become the norm. As much as it's entertaining, I strongly believe that besides witnessing some guy sockpuppet his own bullshit beliefs and crashout over at least 3 boards, nothing of value comes from this and I strongly believe that you should try and build something of value in the real world rather than weaponising your intellect in a place where intelligence is less valued than conformity to a tired narrative (stormfront ideology and tactics) and the ability to derail and reframe discussion in a way that supports you dishonestly.

Not a single fascist in this thread has provided anything of substance, some of them are completely confused about their position, and all of them (i count like 3 in total, because theres that one guy that reentered the thread under the guise of fresh eyes as if it wasn't completely obvious that he was posting to support his own filth because he ignored any of the points i made earlier in the thread and chose to only engage with you.

I'm sitting at the end of this thread wondering if it meant anything more than catharsis to engage at all.

You can prove them wrong beyond all doubt

That literally hasn't even come close to happening once in this thread.

I just know op is some fat shitskin goblin who takes her anger out on here because chad used her as a pump and dump lmao.

No he's a fucking retard that is clearing using chat gpt.

Kek, you are unhinged, paranoid, and mentally challenged.

It's a guy not a her.

I'm Jewish, German and Greek

my first thought was the scene from fight club where edward norton beats himself up in front of his boss.

Is it a "jewish trick" to do basic analytics and attempt to discern what the person I'm talking believes?

If I can figure that out its possible we can talk our way into figuring out a more reasonable non-racist solution.

They really are all like this, they just completely devolve into this schizo frenzy and its unsettling.

I'm here to get my kicks by brutally exposing idiot fascists one by one

Heck yeah, thats awesome. I'm glad you're having fun with it.

but the constant deflection, circular logic, fundamental misunderstanding of their own positions gets kind of tiring.

Well, its why I avoid even replying to some of them because its just like.... Ugh... Like, I always say this, when these dudes get into the weeds of it,

"define your position" because once they actually settle on a topic and actually have to spell out their worldview it becomes impossible for them to actually defend it. Because it is generally inherently illogical most of the time.

I think you created an opportunity for lulz, and that's in the spirit of what Anon Babble actually is

Thank you. I'm glad you see it that way. Yeah they've been stinking up the place for some time haha...

and I strongly believe that you should try and build something of value in the real world rather than weaponising your intellect in a place where intelligence is less valued than conformity

Yeah, that other guy mentioned something similar. You're right.

I will, I'll try to sort of limit the amount of time I spend because, well... Yeah it might not be worth it.

Not a single fascist in this thread has provided anything of substance

Thats so satisfying to hear. Sometimes I wonder about how other people perceive it. That feels great to hear people see it that way.

wondering if it meant anything more than catharsis to engage at all

Sometimes catharsis is all that really matters, just seeing it through till its end.

You literally just ignore entire arguments and then insert whatever bullshit cope you have.

similar amounts of crime in places you can't blame redlining and other copes and buzzwords for, such as Canada and European countries which historically had few to no blacks and none of those American copes to fall back on

Why is this? Why do blacks I'm Canada commit similar rates of violent crimes as blacks in US? Why do blacks in the UK commit similar rates of violent crime as the US blacks? They don't have the same background besides a genetic one.

They really are all like this, they just completely devolve into this schizo frenzy and its unsettling.

That was your simp who was on your side.

You're making a sweeping claim that black people commit "similar rates of violent crime across the us, uk and canada with NO DATA TO BACK IT UP,.

First of all, Canada doesn't even publish racial crime data at the national level. The uk only st arted doing limited reporting in the last decatde, and even in the US, you have arrest statistics, not conviction or actual crime rates - and as stated like twice in the thread already those are heavily influenced by over-policing, target surveillance and systemic bias.

You're not citing comparable datasets because they don't exist. Where the data does exist, it consistently shows disparities in policing, not inherent criminality. You're pointing at outcomes shaped by racism, poverty and social conditions and then pretending they're the product of genes. That's not logic, it's lazy racial determinism dressed up as analysis.

Why do blacks I'm Canada commit similar rates of violent crimes as blacks in US? Why do blacks in the UK commit similar rates of violent crime as the US blacks? They don't have the same background besides a genetic one.

I really don't know Anon. For these very intimate questions like these, I'll admit I'm not the most familiar. Like there could be a lot of reasons why black people from different areas could all have similar crime rates.

What are you trying to accomplish by pursuing this line of questioning. Because I'm certainly not about to be like

"Oh well I guess all blacks are savages lmao"

Like thats just stupid. What are you trying to get at, what are you trying to convey? What do you want?

Define your position. Define what you're looking to get out of this conversation. Clarify exactly what you believe without any bullshit.

the fact that you're talking about "sides" here shows your complete lack of nuance and intent to discuss ideas neutrally. Again, textbook fascist rhetoric. You only think in terms of absolute. This guy is my kind or the enemy. It's lazy, it's exhausting, you tire me.

I'm nuanced but I sound a bog standard totebag lib who trots out the same dataless rhetoric and then seethes about muh fascists when they lose the argument

lmao

Wow thats some very cool snide mockery. Feel free to define your positions anytime. Feel free to actually state what you believe whenever you're ready.

You are not much different from an evangelical Christian zealot that believes he is right when he has never once made a cogent argument. I mean this with sincerity--you are the dumbest poster on Anon Babble. We could go through it all, for example I'm sure your statement here:

fundamental misunderstanding of their own positions

Was your assumption that I was a moral relativist: >What you're doing is moral relativism, masquerading as objectivity, ironically it's a hugely liberal position. You're so fucking stupid mate.
because you are genuinely too unintelligent to understand that I am not masquerading as having objective moral beliefs, that was something you conjured up because you had no argument. In that same post, you forget Beanie, your object of desire, already implied that he would believe it better to hide evidence that races were unequal in the hypothetical situation that it were true.

Your ChatGPT bot even forgot that I admitted to being dogmatic in that same post. You are not only too stupid to understand what you're talking about, you're too stupid to write your own arguments so you outsource it to a bot you could never hope to compete with. You're an embarrassment.

Not "on your side" as in leftist you dimwit, I mean sniffing beanie's farts like a morbidly obese stalker. When he/she didn't reply, that anon went off the rails with psychosis.

I am not masquerading as having objective moral beliefs

So you're.... Immoral? Amoral?

that was something you conjured up because you had no argument

Really helps to know what positions you have, when you clearly define them so I don't have to fill in the blanks and write fanfiction about you.

already implied that he would believe it better to hide evidence that races were unequal

And why did I say that anon? Hmm? Could it be there was crucial context from that conversation that you're omitting?

that I admitted to being dogmatic in that same post

Dogmatic, and yet amoral? So you believe in things strongly, morally unbound. I presume theres some level of... Pragmatism? Detached logic for how the world works that you think being....

Well again you haven't defined anything. Wouldn't have to speculate if you just... Came out and said it.

You're an embarrassment

No moral absolutes, but you do have a concept of what shame is. And are ok with weaponizing it. Ok.

So you're.... Immoral? Amoral?

My moral beliefs are outside the scope of the argument, since the point of discussion was solely systemic racism.

Really helps to know what positions you have, when you clearly define them so I don't have to fill in the blanks and write fanfiction about you.

My beliefs are irrelevant to this discussion, only what was necessary for that about systemic racism was relevant.

And why did I say that anon? Hmm? Could it be there was crucial context from that conversation that you're omitting?

No. You said under no uncertain terms that if, hypothetically, the races were unequal, it would be better to hide it.

Dogmatic, and yet amoral?

No moral absolutes, but you do have a concept of what shame is. And are ok with weaponizing it. Ok.

I see what you're saying, but this is a misunderstanding of how moral relativists see ethics. You can recognize that out beliefs and feelings are socially constructed, but still dislike and oppose murder or rape, etc., while acknowledging that you only hold on to these beliefs as a form of dogma.

What use is there to know my specifc beliefs? Beliefs as a whole are too complex to be encompassed in a 2000 character post, but if there is something specific you want to know, you should come out and say it instead of acting creepy and coy about it.

Wouldn't have to speculate if you just... Came out and said it.

He has said it though. It screams "I'm an insecure stormfront operator who is so afraid of obsolescence that he has to accuse anyone that's able to disintegrate his argument with using chatGPT to form the entire argument. Again, completely lacking nuanced understanding in favour of absolutism and extreme polarisation

if you're not with me you're a liberal, kike, nigger, obese (etc, etc)

if you're smarter than me you clearly used chatGPT to formulate your entire argument

I don't have a way to address that my views are completely undefendable at best and abhorrent as standard.

The absolute level of cope from these mouthbreathing pieces of shit is almost funny, until you realise that complaining like a little bitch (loudly, rudely, unintelligently) gets him more points in this arena than by actually engaging with any of the substance of this thread even though every attempt has been made to address his rhetoric with as much respect as possible, despite the incorrigible nature of his postulation.

Define your position

Blacks commit more violent crime than everyone else.

I was a little on the fence, but after this thread it's nice to know that Beanie is either such a troll or so irredeemably dumb that I can filter and ignore entirely

Oh boohoo. Make a point or keep begging for validation, you haven't done anything this entire thread except whinge and cry.

My moral beliefs are outside the scope of the argument

My beliefs are irrelevant to this discussion

What use is there to know my specifc beliefs?

But knowing who you are is essential to any argument. Here, I'll give an example.

Lets say I'm... The Headmaster at Hogwarts. And I get letters that tell me that my regulations that keep the students safe are too harsh.

Now, as the headmaster, its my job to keep the students safe. But if I'm getting letters from the parents telling me that those regulations are too strict and are negatively affecting the students, I might be inclined to lessen those regulations.

However, if I learn that those letters are being written by VOLDEMORT, yeah, suddenly that exact same information takes on a whole new meaning doesn't it? Because I know Voldemort probably wants less safety regulations so he can target the students.

See what I mean? Who you are means absolutely everything to the argument. I hope you can see what I'm trying to get at. Like thats key context to understanding the full scope of what you're after.

but still dislike and oppose murder or rape, etc

That's a soft and convenient pivot from your earlier f raming where you brought up child rape specifically as a moral absolute, not a vague dislike, but a hardline, unshakeable stance.

When i brought up your reasoning - suppressing truth in favor of belief, is identical to that of religious fundamentalists who justify child marriage and rape you didn't address it, You just diluted your statement from "child rape is always wrong" to a fuzzy "I dislike murder and rape. etc"

You're now trying to hide behind moral relativism to avoid confronting the fact that your reasoning leads to the exact same outcomes you claim to oppose, just in a different uniform. You're not being consistent, you're being evasive, and you're hoping no one notices that you walked back your own example when it started cutting too close.

Stop shifting the goalposts to solve the inadequacy in your own rhetoric.

>Define your position

Blacks commit more violent crime than everyone else.

That's not defining a position, that's like setting your chessboard up, moving E4 and calling it a day you fucking dimwit.

blacks commit more violent crime than everyone else

Because why? Citing what and whom? With respect to what context? With respect to what counterargument?

You really are thick, stormfront. Just take the L and fuck off.

Why not engage with a single argument in isolation? Let me give an example.

Let's say that Lord Voldemort really is the one sending those letters. In that case, his beliefs, founded on hatred, prejudice, and ignorance should still be opposed rationally and with respect to the content of the letters; Who knows when these ideas will one day be brought up again, who knows if the Death Eaters will secretly argue for these beliefs in Hogwarts, from the students, alumni, or professors. Forming solid and well reasoned arguments against Lord Voldemort's rhetoric lays the groundwork for preventing the future rise of Death Eaters and blood-purists, and this dialectic is an essential part of any democratic and enlightenment society.

If Lorr Voldemort's beliefs really are, honestly, truly, and incontrovertibly correct, how can you oppose them? Or is it better to examine your own beliefs in light of his arguments, and adapt in a way that accomodates for his arguments while not compromising your own values?

That's a soft and convenient pivot from your earlier f raming where you brought up child rape specifically as a moral absolute, not a vague dislike, but a hardline, unshakeable stance.

I never said it was a moral absolute. Here is my quote:

Oh. Yes, you believe in it as dogma. I was hoping it was a rational choice. Dogmas are the things we believe but allow no room for criticism. For example, I believe that raping children is always bad, and no evidence would ever dissuade me from this belief. If research were to prove that it did not harm children given some specific environment, I would still refuse it. I would obstruct the evidence if necessary, so that society aligns with how I wish to see it. It is dogma.

You need to be more literate. I never moved any goalposts or compromised on my belief. Because it is dogma, it is unshakable. A moral relativist can recognize something is socially constructed and dislike it, with that same unshakable opposition

No moral absolutes, but you do have a concept of what shame is. And are ok with weaponizing it. Ok

It legitimately seems to be a waste of time to argue with you because you do so in poor faith. This is stereotypical of jews to be absolutely honest.

You're now trying to hide behind moral relativism to avoid confronting the fact that your reasoning leads to the exact same outcomes you claim to oppose, just in a different uniform. You're not being consistent, you're being evasive, and you're hoping no one notices that you walked back your own example when it started cutting too close.

I am being completely consistent. I admitted in this post: >It is dogma.
There is no inconsistency. The inconsistency comes from the same thing you complain about here: >fails to address nuance with shady tactics like ad-hom, strawmanning, intellectual dishonesty and plain stupidity
and here: >complete lack of nuance and intent to discuss ideas neutrally.
Because you make assumptions about my position or beliefs with strawman arguments.

blabbering about nothing

hey this thing you said is wrong

magic word

that word is nonsense but anyway these things happen anyway so your magic word really is bullshit

well what's your argument

that thing you said is wrong

TAKE THE L STORMFRONT

You are most retarded gorilla monkey sewer savage I have ever seen in my life. You will get no more replies from me. Because it is legitimately a waste of my time to type things that you so clearly can not comprehend.

Yeah, I mean I agree 100 percent. Keeping records of that letter, making sure the other teachers know, the Ministry of Magic, and knowing like what specifically was said.

And coming up with other arguments and countermeasures, I'm 100 percent onboard.

But like, thats the thing. I only knew to do all of that, because I KNEW it was Voldemort. And thats my argument. If you're a secret Voldemort? Yeah I kinda NEED to know that!

It legitimately seems to be a waste of time to argue with you because you do so in poor faith

.................
Anon... My dear sweet anon. Why must you wound me in this way? Yes, obviously what I said in that quote IS speculation, and it was rather meant to be probing and somewhat annoying in its aims in order to get the person to define their position.

Which, as I've said, is CRUCIAL, to having the full context for any argument.

You lack the cognitive horsepower to detect the irony in your own meltdown. You strut around pretending your bigotry is grounded in facts but every time you're asked to clarify or substantiate your claims you short circuit and retreat into racial slurs and ad hominems.

You're not a thinker, you're a tantrum in human form. All caps lock bravado with no coherence. This isn't debate for you, it's cosplay. You pretend to be the bold truth-teller but the moment you're asked to define a position beyond "x group bad" you collapse. You opened with a provocation, got intellectually dismantled, then flung your own feces at the wall and called it a check mate.
You're not holding court, you're holding everyone back. It's funny because I'd like to tell you that the world would be better without people like you but that's using your own standpoint as a firing position and that's not only cruel and ironic, it's not necessary. You're showing everyone the weakness of your ideologies because when put to the test, they falter EVERY SINGLE TIME.

I'm a commie leftshit retard who is 1 deminsional and hating men is my whole personality

You don't, really. If students want to play with the Dark Arts on their own, you'll need to think of something some way. It makes no difference whether it is Voldemort saying it or not, because someone who is not related at all may say it, or they may say it without ever being caught.
This is why you must address ideas without prejudice. And if the students are right, what can you do? And if they are right, and their correctness just so happens to align with what Voldemort wants, what can you do? Be incorrect forever?

Hi, welcome to the thread. Take a number and please have a seat. Would you like a drink? Maybe a nice Iced Tea or something?

I'm a commie leftshit

I don't actually consider myself a communist. I do consider myself a progressive democrat, and a Leftist.

who is 1 deminsional

"Dimensional". And yeah, I tend to talk about many of the same talking points because men bring up the same topics. And I have to repeat myself quite often because they have the attention span of a goldfish.

Its quite irritating!

and hating men is my whole personality

WRONG! Its a part of my personality, but certainly not all of it.

Feel free to define your position, maybe like, tell us a bit about yourself. And uh, we can kick things off?

Oh look, another faggot trying to win an argument with rhetorical fireworks instead of substance. Let's break this down, since clarity isn't your strong suit:

You lack the cognitive horsepower to detect the irony in your own meltdown.

Translation: You want to feel smarter than the person you're arguing with, so you open with a cheap insult. Irony? No, the only irony here is you accusing someone of a meltdown while penning a 300-word emotional soliloquy.

You strut around pretending your bigotry is grounded in facts...

This is the classic move: label someone a bigot, and now you don't have to engage with their points. It's intellectual cowardice dressed as moral superiority. Where are the receipts? Where's the actual engagement with the arguments?

You short circuit and retreat into racial slurs and ad hominems.

If that's true, quote them. If not, you're making defamatory claims without evidence - which is ironic for someone accusing others of lacking facts.

You're not a thinker, you're a tantrum in human form.

Again, zero arguments. Just aesthetic dunking. You're trying to win with prose, not logic.

You collapse the moment you're asked to define a position...

Then define the one you're attacking. What claim, specifically, did they make that you refuted? If it was so easy to dismantle, surely you can summarize it? But you don't, because your post is one long emotional performance, not an actual rebuttal.

Flung your own feces at the wall and called it a check mate.

This line is more about sounding edgy than being right. You mistake volume for victory.

You're holding everyone back.

Says the person more interested in silencing than debating.

Bottom line: If someone is wrong, demonstrate it with logic. If your whole response is poetry and posturing, you didn't win. you just shitposted for attention.

There are some issues where the person saying it doesn't necessarily matter because the general practical implications are the same no matter who's saying it.

But it kinda helps to know like, are these genuinely prompted safety concerns? Or an evil plot cooked up by fucking voldemort?

THAT, is the key and defining difference my friend.

Just because Voldemort is right about letting students practice the dark arts doesn't mean you need to begin killing all mudbloods and muggles. And if he really is right, there's nothing you can do besides bury your head deeper and deeper into the sand.

ChatGPT vs. ChatGPT. Grim.

Dead internet theory. Let it be known. I didn't fire the first shot.

Ok, now I understand. Thats not a bad argument. you're essentially saying that, what if Voldemort is writing you a letter, and its stuff that the students actually agree with and is not necessarily an immediate threat to their safety.

I mean, we're entering a better grey area here. Interesting. So Voldemort thinks the students should have better access to the dark arts, and it should be up to the students to decide whether they should pursue these arts or not.

I mean in this case, its absolutely critical that they're making an informed decision. Obviously we can look into dark arts that are at least, REASONABLY SAFE, but beyond that, I mean the school WILL be liable if something goes wrong.

And again, the uh... Architect of this plan... Not exactly the most friendly source is he?

I think you can update the defense against the dark arts program, but there need to be hard limits. Especially when safety is at risk. More regulations, and not every student will be eligible for the advanced lessons. Thats right BITCH, we're screening to make sure no fucking Death Eater Sympathizing ghoul is getting his hands on some fucking blood magic or some shit.

Scholarly sorts only. People who are going to use that knowledge for good ONLY.

You just KNOW that Crabbe, Goyle and Malfoy are going to run around the class casting CRUCIO, CRUCIO, CRUCIO on any gryffindor or person that says that maybe we shouldn't use this on muggles or other wizards.

And therein lies the destruction of the entire fucking argument.

Yes. Voldemort wants the students to learn the Dark Arts to further his own agenda, but if his arguments are irrefutable after reasoned, well-intentioned debate and rational inquiry, and would lead to a net benefit where no issue can be found except "Voldemort wants it", then there isn't much that can be done.
You can also be careful and strict with how these lessons play out and who receives them; Voldemort's initially corrupt ideas are synthesized into something that possesses all of the positive qualities with none of the (theoretical) negative qualities.

But remember I AM the Voldemort.

Yeah I know. It'd be a fucking shitshow from the start. Even if we screen for bad wizards, there's gonna be some student that will abuse these powers and uh... Well yeah that ain't gonna go well.

but if his arguments are irrefutable after reasoned, well-intentioned debate and rational inquiry, and would lead to a net benefit where no issue can be found except "Voldemort wants it", then there isn't much that can be done

THIS IS WHAT I MEAN THOUGH, THATS WHY KNOWING WHY SOMEONE WANTS SOMETHING IS ABSOLUTELY CRUCIAL.

Oh but they make good arguments!

ITS VOLDEMORT COME ON BRO. I always run into these situations where its like. "But the logic is sound!" and then its like.... Yeah, but consider the source and what the person stands to gain!

Sometimes bad people have good ideas, but you need to like... Not just let the bad guys run the show here. You need to be CAUTIOUS.

How many elite bankers Jewish or not did Hitler kill?

jk rowling is jewish

And a very based one.

Beanie, you're arguing in good faith but let's draw the reality of it. You're arguing with a guy that is strongly appealing to the authority of the progenitor of wizard eugenics as a valid source of information.

Fascists require a strong authoritarian leader to follow because they don't have a spine of their own.

We both agree that the slytherins with death-eater fathers are going to misuse the dark arts at the first opportunity they get, so perhaps we shouldn't teach those dark arts, regardless of the source of information. This isn't censorship, it's common sense.

And if we do teach those dark arts on the basis that people can choose to enact upon them how they see fit, the context still remains that their fathers and therefore their contextual conditioning will influence their actions, which just disintegrates this nincompoops arguments again in context of the entire thread.

You are so retarded. I bet you are south American.

Yeah, but consider the source and what the person stands to gain!

Well think of it from Voldemort's perspective. What does he gain from the synthesis between your ideals and his own, if you truly determine that it will be a safe, net positive? Think about what Voldemort wants, and what the Death Eaters want. No one suddenly chooses to become a bad person, torturing and killing everything in their path. Tom Riddle was left without family, abandoned, orphaned, feeling like a perpetual outsider in a world of muggles. Suddenly he is whisked away to a world of people like him, that care about him, of things he cares about, and even that he'd want to save. He may be evil and unconscionable, but he still has beliefs and desires. The same can be said for every Death Eater behind him--they support him for their own fears and motivations.

If Voldemort wants students to know the Dark Arts for his own agenda, you must wonder what that is. For him, and people like Draco and Lucius, it may be to defend the Wizarding World from what he perceives as a muggle threat (along with many other thinga). Even if he can't arm every muggle, by convincing Hogwarts to teach SOME students the Dark Arts, he can increase Hogwart's safety from muggle attacks (that he fears), and even if this is not fully what he wants, he is more satisfied by having the synthesis of his idea and yours than to have his concern completely unaddressed.

In this way, you appease Voldemort without ceding power to him. Part of democracy is understanding the needs and concerns of the people and addressing them adequately. Maybe some students feel the need to join the Death Eaters because Dumbledore refuses to ever address these concerns--by engaging with them instead of completely vilifying every fear and concern, Hogwarts can keep wizards safe, appease Voldemort without putting anyone at risk, and keep people from feeling like being a Death Eater is their only option.

This site is mostly filled with conservative incel MRA men many of whom hate jews

mostly true. we also have a few severely autistic triptrannies who shit up the board for 18 hours a day with their inane retardation as well.

um if you were on the right side of history you would be allowed by the tyrannical authority to overthrow them

retard

autistic reddit screeching about muh incels

retard

lolbert vs libtard arguments

lmao its so funny, two clueless groups

beanie is a girl because trannies hate jk rowling

Make no mistake: Voldemort is playing the long game. He is happier that purebloods are safer from muggle attack, but he is NOT satisfied. He and his followers will continue to push legislation in their direction, but by rational inquiry there can only be two options: You prove that Voldemort is wrong, or you become more correct. If Voldemort proves that Hogwarts will not be safe without some Dark Arts education, and you determine that this is true, what use is there in making wizards unsafe purely because you hate Voldemort?

It is a game of chess that is always happening in the background of democratical society. It's obvious that I am one of those Death Eaters to you, I have my own concerns and desires, but if it is possible to both address your concerns and my own, then I would happily accept it over not having any solution at all. I do not want to stop at Dark Arts for some students, but if we can both agree that it will not hurt anyone and will help people like me feel safer, then it is better than nothing.

This is what fascism always does: It enters softly, appeals to empathy it would never return and then asks to meet halfway on principles it wants to eventually destroy.

You're not arguing for synthesis, you're arguing for submission, wrapped in reason.

No one has to "hate voldemort" to reject his ideology, they just need to remember where it leads.

We're not playing chess. You're just losing the game and hoping we forget what you are.

P.S. In the Harry Potter Canon, voldemort lost repeatedly due to the power of love. That's something you can't understand without convoluting it with power.

What does your ChatGPT say about the full one?

Your Hogwarts cosplay is a messy attempt at logic that doesn't quite pass the OWLs.

You're arguing with a guy that is strongly appealing...

Appealing to a source doesn't mean endorsing all of their ideology. That's like quoting Nietzsche and being accused of supporting nihilist mustache twirling. If the information is valid, engage with it don't dismiss it because of the messenger. That's textbook genetic fallacy.

Fascists require a strong authoritarian leader...

This is projection packaged as psychology. Not all structured ideology is fascism. Not all preference for order means worship of authority. If you label anyone with discipline or hierarchy as spineless, you're not arguing, you're moralizing from a soapbox.

We both agree that the slytherins with death-eater fathers...

So now it's collective punishment based on lineage? You just argued against eugenics while endorsing guilt by bloodline. That's not "common sense" that's preemptive discrimination. You're literally using the logic of the villain you're denouncing...

Perhaps we shouldn't teach those dark arts

If your solution to potential misuse is banning knowledge, you've already lost the intellectual battle. Teaching doesn't mean endorsing, it means preparing people to understand and counter it. That's like saying we shouldn't teach about propaganda because someone might use it.

Their fathers and therefore their contextual conditioning will influence their actions

Again, this is determinism dressed up as insight. People aren't software that installs the beliefs of their parents. Conditioning matters, yes, but so does agency. You just argued that environment trumps will entirely, which is both bleak and wrong.

You tried to cloak flawed reasoning in metaphor and moral certainty. But good arguments don't need capes or curses, just clarity. This ain't a wizard duel. It's logic. Try again faggot.

Its insane how right wing and antisemitic the people around me have become. Libshits cant stop the wave of neo fascism, fuck off and dilate your axewound faggots.

Youre not rebutting-youre rehearsing

Rehearsing the same tired defenses that always follow when fascist sympathies get caught in the open

Appealing to Voldemort isnt the same as endorsing him

Youre appealing to the ideological architect of wizard supremacy to argue for institutional reform Thats not citing Nietzsche its roleplaying as Goebbels and calling it nuance

Not all structure is fascism

No one said it was But you werent advocating structure You were advocating the integration of fascist pedagogy under the banner of neutrality while self identifying as one of the ideologues The structure you defend is domination not order

Rejecting Death Eater kids is blood guilt

False No one suggested punishing them only that inherited ideology needs scrutiny not blind inclusion Safeguarding isnt eugenics But thanks for confirming you cant tell the difference

Banning knowledge is cowardice
No one banned anything The argument was dont teach weapons to people already primed to use them on the vulnerable You know like every single one of the villains youre trying to rationalize

People have agency
Sure But agency isnt magic Its shaped by context upbringing and ideology The refusal to account for that isnt optimism its intellectual laziness dressed as moral high ground

You lost the argument the metaphor and the narrative
And now youre trying to smother that loss under layers of pseudo rational deflection

This wasnt logic It was postcoital cope after your ideology got laid bare and left cold on the floor

Youre not Voldemort
Youre a Death Eater without a plan begging Hogwarts to let you teach blood magic to kids for their safety

Threads over

Also cope, scum.

Jesus Christ can you stop with the irrelevant ChatGPT aphorisms? They're boring, irrelevant, and have absolutely no substance at all. The fact that you want to use them proves that you have no capacity to argue on your own. None of anything you have ever said has been a refutation, intelligent, or a "gotcha." Just irrelevant tripe that passes for a reply to you because you don't understand either your own posts or mine.
At this point you're literally playing GPT vs. GPT with some anon.

Here are my two posts, refute or boohoo loser:
(1)
(2)

Imagine Beanie fucking your face, yanking your hair, calling you a filthy moid and berating you while you're unable to respond

This is exactly why brown countries should be banned from using AI. They have no idea how to use it. It's like handing power tools to children, or maybe even nuclear weapons to South Africa.....

No normie is screaming at the top of his lungs about tinder dating statistics, or how chad gets all the bitches.

Still didn't deny or refute in any way that those statistics are correct. Normies are fucking stupid, there's people out there that still think that burning coal doesn't cause any problems. I remember being a kid at some metro-park with my family, during a drought year. The streams were dry, and some guy was mad that "they turned off the water". I had a neighbor who was an 8th grade dropout, and worked with the fire department. Normies don't understand what is going on.