Are right wingers going to pretend that work is a good thing just because leftists are against it?

Are right wingers going to pretend that work is a good thing just because leftists are against it?

X is good just because leftists are against it

Yes. I would support murder if leftists were against it.

No, they're going to pretend that work is a good thing because they can't stop choking on billionaire cock.

There's been so many newcomers to Congress that are pull aside and told the unspoken rule of:

always vote the opposite of what the otherside is for or against

unironcally yes
just how not hight prices are nothing to worry about because the president is right wing

The right only exists to serve the capitalist class, while the goal of the left is to fight against the capitalist class. It really is that simple.

faggot

the goal of the left is to fight against the capitalist class

ok

left

post Republican who owned slaves and killed people for Bush's war

?

muh capitalism

go back.

Go back to smoothbrain town

I don't support any of those things. I support capitalism.

HR destroying White men's resumes

This has never been an issue. You're just incompetent.
t. White man who gets fast-tracked all the time, can get away with anything compared to my black coworkers, and has never been denied a job/advancement simply because I'm white, educated, and competent

For real, if you're a white male and you're not easily succeeding in the job market, you're just dumb or mentally ill (probably both)

Oh, so you support an imaginary capitalism as opposed to the real ome that actually exists. Why? Is it that hard to confront reality and that your economic beliefs are what keep you down?

Oh, so you mean you're a collaborator. I know your type. Creepy, very much nonthreatening at the same time, associated with the military industrial complex. You can choose to be part of your aristocracy as much as you want, but you are part of the problen and a traitor to your race. I hope PBS and the CIA are worth it, Liz Warren.

Why would I support the economic system of the US? It is bad and I am not a socialist.

The one thing that catholics got right was their opposition to the term "protestant busywork." That is, work for the sake of work whether anything gets accomplished or not.

Work is good, but not because retards are opposed to it. Being in support of something strictly because the group you disagree with is opposed to it is straight retardation.

not a socialist

support the economic system of the US

We know. You support all of this. You don't have to keep saying it. What does your ideal system look like, other than this?

I don't get that from the right at all. For example Trump signed an executive order for HHS to negotiate lower drug prices with pharma companies for Medicare. That's a long time left issue.

Also, right wingers think work is good because they believe social programs are for those who need support, not to give people the choice to not support themselves paid by the taxpayer.

Are right wingers going to pretend that work is a good

No, I won't. You have my word.

Yeah but they also believe that playing video games all day is worshipping a false god, and receiving charity that you don't actually need is a sin. You don't need to stay busy all day for the sake of not being idle, but you still need to support yourself.

Seems like it.
Though I am a racist NatSoc, I do think that it's fucking absurd that the 40+ hour week is still a thing, with technology and outsourcing to billions of slaves. We are long overdue a fucking UBI and Keynes' 15 hour work week, but we need more on 'the right' to come on board.
Sadly, UBI still gets a bad rap for 'muh communism', even though it's a much needed band aid for how fucked up capitalism has become under globalism. We cannot sustain this shit anymore. We cannot 'compete' with literal slaves without becoming slaves ourselves. Fuck wage-slavery. Perot was right.
wtfhappenedin1971.com/

I'm not schizo enough to respond to this. I'm sorry that you're a sub-par white man.

What if your job requires monitoring a critical system 24 hours a day? Then the only way for the job to get done is if NEETs let themselves be hired to shorten your shifts, or if you pick up enough shifts so that the job is done? What if you work in an industry where the demand for your service is already greater than the workers in the industry can keep up with? There's other reasons to work more than 15 hour weeks besides financial ones.

It's not because leftists are against it, it's because the right is the political wing of the bosses, and they want (you) to be cheap labor who doesn't complain or want anything better.

What if your job requires monitoring a critical system 24 hours a day?

Then the only way for the job to get done is if NEETs let themselves be hired to shorten your shifts

Yeah, that.
The idea with short work weeks is that basically everyone would be job-sharing; so there would be more shifts where it's necessary. Though as most jobs are now service job hell, or largely make-work, there would only need to be 2/3 shifts for an office job. Lower unemployment is good, no?
I don't say that everyone should or should not be NEET; though it should be an optional 'life choice' and should not be stigmatised anymore. With all the 'real jobs' going to Red Chinese slaves, those jobs are never coming back anyway. We were supposed to have more free-time anyway, whether due to technology or now outsourcing.
UBI would give people the right to choose whether to work for extra money (in what is mostly shit 'leftover' post-outsourcing jobs), or not. People should also get the current full week's pay for 15 hours too, an effective pay-rise, because employers have been robbing wages and profiteering since the fucking 70s anyway. They can fucking afford it. Same with billionaires funding a UBI. Sure beats what we have now, with deliberate under-staffing and over-working, all while being under-paid.

Wing ding dong, Wing-a-ding ding ding dong.
The joke is "right-wingers" are the ones attempting to reindustrialize and protect workers, while "left-wingers" rage about tariffs and demand more power for multinationals.

UBI is never, ever, ever ever ever ever happening, anon. Not ever. How do you think the people in charge got us to where we are currently? They would sooner liquidate us all for a nickel in their personal savings.

Sad and probably true.
The issue is that too many people in the West are being put out of work, and the jobs are simply no longer there because of outsourcing to slaves.
Something will have to be done to prevent societal collapse via mass-unemployment and crime. Same thing with the eventuality of no-one being able to buy anything, when costs of living have gone beyond sanity.
How else can they fix it from completely breaking? Something has to give. If they broke it with their greed, they will have to clean up the mess.
The governments and billionaires obviously won't do it for humane reasons, but they will probably have to do it for self-preservation reasons.

In my ideal system:

firms compete against each other

goods are owned privately

welfare doesn't exist

immigration isn't allowed

women aren't allowed to work

firms compete against each other

Literal definition of communism

Is that a joke, bait, or legitimate retardation?

Leftist marxists are brain damaged anyway and stuck in an extremely outdated left-right dichotomy. It's the result of having one's views unopposed in a leftist echo chamber for years.

A leftist will claim that the right does the same, but how so? A right winger sees anti-right propaganda in every entertainment medium, in almost every news channel, in academia, on every social media, even here--what is ostensibly the most right wing website on the internet--this post will likely be immediately opposed by a leftist. A right-winger's views are tested and opposed everywhere and at every level. It is not the result of an echochamber, but observation of reality and successful rhetoric.

In the context of American politics, anything that doesn't dogmatically support crony capitalism is communism.
Therefore, economic competition is communism.

I think communism is a system of shared ownership of the means of production by workers, but idk I never claimed to be smart

True.
Sadly, both the mainstream left and right want globalist slavery. For the left, open borders. For the right, cheap slaves. It's a race to the bottom. Only the GEOTUS' faction is trying to fight globalist slavery; yet to the mainstream he's still the satan. The anti-autist thing does not help. Many of us simply cannot work these awful leftover service jobs without sperging out. Factory/back office jobs were much much better.
Despite all his efforts to bring real jobs back, unless Red China is glassed or embargoed, the West will never have full employment again; hence the need for UBI and a much shorter work week. Economic nationalists and rightists need to realise this, and support the part-emancipation of the workers. It can only help the White birthrate too. Who the fuck wants to bring another generation into this hell-hole just to be a slave to globalist economic interests.

Reasonable take. Unfortunately the right is afraid of adopting ideas that might seem too socialist despite already being very nationalistic, autarkist, anti big business (most rightists already see big business as inherently globalist) etc.

The irony is that Western workers had it a lot better while the Iron Curtain was still standing.
This is why the West selling out to evil Red China, by letting them into the WTO in 2001, is so disastrous.
The 2008 cataclysm only sped things up, and Westerners have been feeling the pinch ever since.
Not only Perot called out the evils of outsourcing; this billionaire jew sad the same thing in 1994 and they laughed at him:
charlierose.com/videos/1563

We live in a post work economy.
The biggest companies make money from farming meta data or running Jewish Ponzi schemes

We live in a post work economy.

We SHOULD be, but we are not.

that video

KEK it's hilarious seeing people 30 years ago telling people what will happen as an obvious result of a policy and being told

um actually

and then we see everything happened... exactly as he said it would.

I'm glad you're aware of the video.
Sadly, he died only three years after that interview. Quite convenient for the globalists. That based kike was even against the EUSSR.
The fucked up thing is that even if the West had the balls to cut off Red China, there is still Red Vietnam, who 'converted' to capitalism in 1986.
As much as I respect the good for Red China that Deng Xiaoping did after the disaster of Mao, essentially converting a backward Maoist hell-hole into one-party capitalism, the West should never have let them into the WTO after Tiananmen. The Western elites did it anyway and hoped that the CCP would give up power and China would liberalise into a democracy. They were wrong. The fact that Xi became 'president for life' proves that we should not have economic ties with the Red Chinese. The fact that they even got away with unleashing the pandemic, and all the human and financial damage they caused, is a fucking disgrace.
Red China enables this total evil of globalism, this is why it is the enemy. Nixon should never have opened ties; they were already split from the Soviets.

Seeing as Uncle Adolf was pro-worker (outside of WW2 POW slavery), I do wonder what National Socialism would have thought of UBI and short work weeks. Seeing as he wanted families to own their own home and workers to have generous vacations, wages and benefits (and have children), he surely would have agreed with it, even with autarky, given the rise of technology. This does not conform to the mainstream view of him, naturally. Even though he fixed the devastated German economy years before WW2 broke out.

There is nothing that I've read in NSDAP source material that would suggest he'd be against UBI as a matter of principle. If he had any reason to believe UBI would lead to a decline in the "moral strength" of the Volk then yes, he would have opposed it. Nazis had a lot of pro-worker socialist policies so I'm sure they would have considered it in a heavily automated world.
I know these are very ambiguous terms but it's difficult to explain without a giant infodump.

I appreciate your reasoned response, bruder.
Though they inherited a social welfare ('bux) system, given the mass-unemployment in the last years of Weimar, they did not get rid of it.
It seems to me that a rich working class (and a healthy, non-decimated, middle class) can only be GOOD for an economy.
Yet since the early 1970s and especially since 2008 (and the elimination of the middle class), it's clear that the globalist West wants to crush us all to death.
I don't know how decades of falling purchasing power, with constantly rising inflation, can ever be sold as 'a good thing' for the masses. Death to globalists.