The reason incels are rejected is not because they are ugly;

The reason incels are rejected is not because they are ugly;
It's because they do not know how to engage play.
Which is to say, incels do not know how to invite a woman to play, or how to engage in play in a way that makes her want to play again.

This is why I, with my khhv wizard status, can no longer call myself an incel. I know how to play, even though I refuse. Have fun arguing with incels repeating buzzwords that make you think they are AI bots, they will never understand anon.

I don't like this mentality, anon. "They will never understand."
They have the capacity to understand, it's just a matter of whether or not they are willing to accept it.

It's not that I don't understand it's just that discussing whores and their behaviors in general is really just a tremendous waste of time.

I don't like the mentality either, but it takes self actualization for them to stop blaming external sources and take a look at their own behavior. This can't be taught.

Economy is shit. We're all slaves. Life's wasted. Existence always was worthless and pointless, butt whenever the illusions and incentives on a societal scale are removed, the unwashed masses get depressed. And are in crisis. When half the population is single and depressed the concept of an incel makes no sense. You're not special, you're pretty much the majority now.
A lot of men simply have no interest in women, esp. asife long partners, because they're depressed obese enslaved and drugged ed ridden motherfuckers who have shit jobs that don't pay shit.
TL;DR: fuck you and your games. I don't give a shit.

The reason incels are rejected is not because they are ugly

No it is because women have a choice and they are hypergamous, and men dont get a choice with their blood, money what they want to protect or provide for, basically enslaved and taken for granted.

You say that, but you're the one who brought up whores.
I also disagree with that, it can be taught. It's just a matter of if the person being taught is willing to accept the lesson.

This isn't like teaching a fish to fly.
It's more like teaching a bird who, for some reason, has never flown or learned to fly exactly how to fly.
Whether or not they take the lesson, and leave the nest, is a different story.
You're consuming too much internet news. Things have done nothing except improve. Things get better and better every day.
Men also have a choice, don't be silly. You can choose to serve yourself, or you can choose to serve society at large.

you got no game

I... know? there's a thing that I know I lack compared to everybody else

If you accept it, then what are you doing to change it?
There's a difference in what you're doing, and what real acceptance is. You are defeated by it.
You say "I have no game. OH WELL I GIVE UP THEN!!"
Someone who accepts their lack of game looks for ways to learn the skill. Because they're truly aware of their own lack.

So I'll ask again, what are you doing to change it?

Men also have a choice, don't be silly. You can choose to serve yourself, or you can choose to serve society at large.

Yes choosing to serve myself would be to form my own army with fellow incels and betacuck (who dont want to be it) and walking all over this hives you call nations, with a brutality never seen before, taking everything and not asking for a single shit, thats how I serve myself, using my blood for myself only, and telling other men to do the same.

Whether or not they take the lesson, and leave the nest, is a different story.

I like your optimism and I will be lurking the thread to hopefully see some anons spread their wings.

That's a cult. It also won't get you very far. If anything, it's just digging yourself deeper. Sort of like chopping your nose off to spite your face.
Or you could accept the invitation to come back to the center, and play with everyone else.

It's your choice, really.
It's not the type of thing that happens in the span of a single thread. Typically, that sort of change takes a lot of time. Especially when people are so engrained in their beliefs.

Things have done nothing except improve.

Head up your ass

If you accept it, then what are you doing to change it?

I said I know there's a thing I don't have compared to others, I don't know if it's game because there's guys with no game that still get relationships. just like how guys with no money or guys with no looks, things that are thought of as must-haves. those clearly aren't must-haves, but there's something that's a must-not-lack that I lack. and if I don't know what it is, I don't know how to change it

Nah, I was born at the center and it doesnt have shit to offer me, all a bunch of lies and hypocrisy, Im just waiting for things to get very bad and then I will make my play, while I wait Im sorting things out. I will never be part of any lame faggot culture again.

Don't listen to that other annon, he's a boomer who believes in the just-world fallacy, that 'everything is fine', 'things are only getting better', and that 'dating is easier than ever'.

internet news

I've described my life to you. And the lives of men I see around me on a daily basis. People with full time jobs who make this fucking world go around.. For what tho? We're done I think, we quit this bullshit "civilization"

just let me dismiss the reality and everything and tell you how your supposed equals and government are entitled to all of your resources and your entire existence just because...

Braindead fucking nigger whore. Choje on your stupid games. My dick doesn't get hard, my libido was murdered, so you're worthless to me.

Head in the clouds with sight as far as the eyes can see.
If you got your head out of your ass, you could see things are quite nice.
What if the thing that you're identifying is not some quantifiable trait, but rather some elusive set of beliefs which allow them to act in a specific way. So, by trying to find the thing you don't have, you're necessarily looking away from it.
If you want an image, it's sort of like trying to grab water. As you squeeze the water just shoots out between your fingers.
Or, if you want an even more apt image, sticking with the water theme, it's like someone who is drowning in a pool of water, flailing around only making their situation worse.
You've missed your play. You waited too long. Your desire to find the perfect moment is always your downfall. I'd imagine this is a problem you encounter often.
The people yearn for a better future, they yearn for the adventure, the calling to go out and find it, or make it themselves.
You cannot deny this.

You've missed your play. You waited too long. Your desire to find the perfect moment is always your downfall. I'd imagine this is a problem you encounter often.

This is only beginning for me.

>Someone who accepts their lack of game looks for ways to learn the skill.

It isn't a checklist or a flowchart. If you don't instinctively understand it, it's not like you can write a cheat-sheet procedure that lets yo fake it. Or more precisely, you can try that, but normies will see through it in seconds.

You didn't describe your life to me. You described regurgitated news and ideologies you learned from someone else.
"We're all slaves" "The economy is shit" "everyone is depressed"
These are your world views. These are the messages that have been planted in your mind from media sources.

The people yearn for a better future

They haven't been getting it though, and they can't make it unless the status quo is burned to the ground first.
Begone boomeranon

Were not naive babies. We're grown old ass men here. The world doesn't get better. It's evident. Don't underestimate my intelligence and lie to my face. You're not doing yourself any favors.

The annon you're arguing with is a boomer retard who will say anything to justify his 'everything is great just work harder' worldview. He'll even say math isn't real.

Fraid not, anon. Fraid not. You've had multiple opportunities. Instead of taking advantage, you bought into someone else's ideology. Now, you're doing their bidding.
It quite literally is though. There's a step by step process to it, just like everything in life. There's no instinct required.
What you're referring to as "instinct" isn't that. It's the outcome of learning the process at a young age.
It's like building a house, if you follow the steps correctly, you'll have a house.
Who is this "they"? Plenty of people are flourishing.
I'm doing the exact opposite of underestimating your intelligence. I'm assuming you're capable of opening your eyes and seeing the world for what it really is, and that you have the ability to stop looking at things through your filtered glasses of doom and gloom, which you wear to intentionally make yourself feel bad.

Plenty of people are flourishing

And they are all rich CEOs, Chads, or all people in your head

Fraid not, anon. Fraid not. You've had multiple opportunities. Instead of taking advantage, you bought into someone else's ideology. Now, you're doing their bidding.

Reality is not an ideology, the complete opposite actually, I study philosophy which makes me psychologically inmune to mob ideologies. The fact that women are whores and only whore out to a select few, is not some invention of our mind, it is objective truth, reality.

Don't think I forgot about you, boomerannon, I recognize that 200% logic anywhere:
I screencaped your bad math too

Prices have doubled and tripled over the last 5 years. Income if the 98.7639% of the global population did not double and triple. The world is factually worse now because of that.

flourish my ass

Wages have been stagnant since late 1960s, yet the productivity has increased. And not a tiny bit either. Productivity has doubled and tripled, etc.. too.
There is factually no reason to play any of the games. Because there isn't a fair game in this universe and ohe has to be a blind braindead imbecile to think otherwise. It's rigged. You'll always lose. It's rigged for you to always lose.

I want to play in the sandbox and throw water balloons at each other, then have wild passionate sex.

This is how I envision adult playgrounds, not a strip club

Muh game is useless if youre ugly and poor

Nope, the majority is. There's a very small percentage of people who are not.
I'll grant you that CEO's and Chads are flourishing more, but they also put in way more work than everyone else.
Then how are you espousing a mob ideology? You set yourself up for that one. This idea(ology) that everything is not your idea, it's something you learned, and in fact, you're trying to promote it and trying to get people to follow your mob idea(ology).
That's fine. By engaging and fighting with my ideas, you allow them to exist in your head.
Remember me, remember my ideas, and most of all, make you remember my over the top, nonsensical metaphors using weird and abstract math that doesn't really make any sense. Make sure you try and understand it, think about my words, think about my ideas. Make sure you try and prove it wrong.

corporatefinanceinstitute.com/resources/management/aida-model-marketing/
Wages have increased, that's why the prices are able to rise. Did you know that the minimum wage in 1970, was $1.50. The minimum wage in most places now is nearly $15.
In 1970 the cost of a lb of beef was around $0.66
Now it's around $6

Interesting how the prices and the wages have stayed basically exactly the same.

My productivity is 5 times higher and I work longer hours. I must be paid at least 5x more than I am.

Then how are you espousing a mob ideology? You set yourself up for that one. This idea(ology) that everything is not your idea, it's something you learned, and in fact, you're trying to promote it and trying to get people to follow your mob idea(ology).

You dont know what you are talking about. All ideas are learned, because everything except instincts, are learned, what makes an ideology is that it is based in dialectics, while a philosophy is based on reason and logic. Dialectics are mob nonsense beliefs, reason is the understanding of the objective truth of reality. So, again, you no clue what your talking about.

Legitimate question, why do you care?

You literally typed that out in that screencap. You have no grasp on reality. Now you admit you suck at math at least, instead of trying to backtrack with schizo pseudomath.

Nope, the majority is

cites a corporate site

comes to corpo conclusions

Very interesting. Did you know housing, medical, and education costs far outpaced inflation. Corpo simps like to get around this by ignoring that, and focusing on beef, or TVs, like out of some PragerU video funded by oil barons.
This is just factually wrong, facts don't care about your feelings

i dont even know what the fuck that means
but its not true
its cause they are ugly

CEO's and Chads are flourishing more, but they also put in way more work than everyone else.

So Jeff Bezos makes like 5 million times what the average person makes, so he "worked as hard" as 5 million people?
If you believe that, I've got a bridge to sell you.

I doubt that, but you should bring that up with your boss.
For starters, not all ideas are learned, some are created.
Secondly a philosophy is an open ended idea. What you have proposed is not open ended, it's close ended. Your perspective is THE way. Things ARE terrible, things ARE bad, things ARE doomed and the only way to right it is to overthrow society. This is not a philosophy, this is an ideology.
Not only is it an ideology, it's not even your own. It's something you allowed someone else to plant in your head. You went and got yourself brainwashed and turned yourself into a pawn of some psychopath and now you're pushing their ideology, hoping you can brainwash enough people that your favorite psychopath comes into power and saves you from (?????) and return you to the good old days (?????)

It's the same exact story as Hitler.
Do you not recall, I said the math was not exact, it was all to illustrate a point. The only exact part was that as the population doubles, your chance of NOT finding a gf halves (or close to halves).
And you continued to argue with the 1% chance remaining as 1% regardless of the population.

I'm arguing about YOUR chance of finding her, not the chance of her existing.
Jeff Bezos started a company. Which, I don't know if you know this, takes a lot of work. If your company works out, eventually the money you make does the work. That's how money works.

Yeah. Socialcel. Sperg. Broken. Whatever you wanna call it.

Jeff Bezos did not work 5 million times as hard as your average carpenter, and he doesn't do shit now, He just owns stuff and makes money off of other peoples' work.

That's how money works

yeah, you own a lot of stuff, and other people who don't have to work for you, while you do nothing. The system is rigged.

"incels" euginicis manufactured term to inflame the psyche of autistic men. feminism has beaten the idea of 'play' with women, out of both men and women.

If our productivity is shit and shouldn't be compensated properly, then none of your ideas of engaging with the world make sense. The entire premise falls apart when you pretend you don't need poor workers in hundreds of millions to exploit as your de-facto slaves. And to make the world you enjoy so much go around. It's like, fine. Except WE don't pretend. We slowly quit thus bullshit. I don't sign shitty contracts. I do mean social and civil too.

You know what? This is not the worst "advice" I've seen posted by some character on Anon Babble since at least you're not advising anons to do stupid shit to rekt their own lives for your amusement...sorry I meant their own good.

You kept trying to argue that increasing population increases your odd of finding a partner, and then retracted the math from earlier where I called you out about your probabilities exceeding 100%

So to use your retard example, suppose 1% of women are interested in you
So with 200 people, that's one (1) woman
And with 400 people that's two (2) women

"see odds are more gooder"

But your logic fails when you realize any woman, on average, wouldn't be interested in just one man in your example (though in real life his name is Chad). if they were only interested in one man, that would result in a One-to-One pairing, in which case, population size doesn't matter.

And if they aren't, which would have to be the case for the percentage to always be 1%, they'd have to be interested in more than one person. If it's 1% for me, then it must also be 1% for Bob, and Joe, and every other man in the population. Say the population is 2000 people. So for every one (1) of the 1000 men, there are ten (10) women interested in them, which would total more than the population of 1000 women, so logically for your 1% rule to work, each woman would have to be attracted to 1% of the total male population. Therefore, as the population grows, sure the number of women who would be interested in me would grow, but so to would the number of other men she'd also be interested in.

That, my retarded boomer, is why you suck at math.

The return of wealth on work is not linear. It's exponential, and it exponentially compounds when you bring money into the equation.
As you increase the amount of work you do, the amount of wealth you generate explodes in an exponential fashion.

And Jeff Bezos doesn't do nothing. You can say that Jeff Bezos profits off other people's work, but those people also profit off of Bezos' work.
It's also not rigged, not in the slightest. If you want to get rich, go make something. Change the world. Money is so abundant right now, it's literally everywhere. Once you get a little you realize how easy it is to get more.

feminism has beaten the idea of 'play'

I see what you're saying, and it does hold some truth. A lot of feminist ideology paints men out to be the worst things since burnt bread, with ideas like all men are rapists and evil and yada yada. So there is some merit to what you're saying.
But the way you beat this is by proving it wrong and getting other men to prove it wrong as well.

It's also not exclusively feminist doing this, there's a certain subset of men who are also pushing the idea that all men are like this.
What?
Compensation is based on ability. If you do a bad job, you get bad pay.
If you suck at a video game, you won't climb. It's the same concept.
But that's a form of feedback, it means you're doing doing as good as you could. Which means you could do more.
You can hardly even call it advice, I'm more just commenting on my own observations. The closest thing to advising I do is say "you can do better than that."

Jeff Bezos doesn't do nothing

You're right, he does make the world a worse place objectively, and that is not nothing.

go out and make something

Millions do in factories, and somebody like Bezos makes money off of their work, and keeps what they make, and only gives them a fraction of what they are worth.

But those people also profit off of Bezos

Not true, if Amazon pays you 15 bucks an hour, the work you do must be worth MORE than 15 bucks an hour, or else it wouldn't be profitable for them to hire you. That 'extra' is partly put back into running the business, but a chunk of it goes directly to Bezos. He makes money off of work he didn't do.

Money is so abundant right now, it's literally everywher

That's the problem, banks, the feds, fractional reserve banking. When money is everywhere, it is worth nothing. German Marks were everywhere in the 20s, on walls, in fireplaces, tied together as building blocks for children

You kept trying to argue that increasing population increases your odd of finding a partner,

Yes. As the population increases, your statistical probability of finding your gf increases proportional to the increase of the population.
Just like if you get a 10 sided dice, and let's you want the number 3. You roll the dice 1 time, you chances of getting the number 3 are exactly 10%.
Now if you roll the dice TEN times, your chance of getting the number 3 are 65% across all ten rolls. There's a 65% chance that one of the 10 rolls will contain the number 3.
And as you roll more and more times, the chances that your rolls will contain the number 3 increases. Even though the individual chances of each roll is still 10%.

This is the phenomenon I am talking about. As the population increases the chances of finding your gf increases as well. Just like as you increase the amount of rolls for the dice, the chances your specific number will appear increases.

he does make the world a worse place objectively

That's very debatable. Mass production and mass distribution are objectively a good thing.

Millions do in factories

Wrong. Those people are managing someone else's creation. They are not making something.

if Amazon pays you 15 bucks an hour, the work you do must be worth MORE than 15 bucks an hour

That doesn't refute the point. You're also proving that you don't understand supply chains very well.

That's the problem

So the problem is that money is too easy to access....? You want everyone to be poor and to be unable to afford things? Huh?

Again, I explained, in great detail, how population increase does NOT increase your odds of finding a GF, and you, being a retard boomer with not even a third grade understanding of math, just flat out ignored it.

Go on, do one of your schizo pseudo-math argument to try to 'prove me wrong'. You don't understand shit.

Wrong. Those people are managing someone else's creation. They are not making something.

So only Jack the Jackass who patended his particular design of chair ONCE, one singular time, made every one of the individual chairs that every one of his 5000 workers made that year, instead of the 5000 workers who cut the wood, smoothed and sanded the wood, hammered in the nails, and painted the chairs? That's smoothbrained.

That doesn't refute the point.

Yes it does. You don't seem to understand how 'profit' works.

So the problem is that money is too easy to access....? You want everyone to be poor and to be unable to afford things? Huh?

I'll take 'What is Inflation' for 200

I already addressed your faulty reasoning in the previous conversation we had.
You're simply trying to double calculate the chances of failure.

If there's a 1% chance of her being attracted to you there's a 99% chance of her not being attracted to you.
Inside of that 99% chance of her not being attracted to you, includes the 1% chance she's attracted to Bob, joe, or Stacy, or Chad, or Brad, or her own dad.

It's a very simple set of logic, if isn't not attracted to you, she is attracted to something else.

The thing you're doing is like saying "but there's a 10% chance of the dice landing on 7 or 6 or 8, so it's still only a 10% chance of you getting the 3 you want"
Which is true, but only on a per roll basis. If you look at the entire population of rolls, all 10 rolls, there's a 65% chance that any single roll would contain a 3.
Each individual roll has a 10% chance of success and a 90% chance of failure.
But a set of 10 rolls has a 65% chance of success and a 35% chance of failure.
And a set of 100 rolls has a 99.99999% chance of success and a 0.0000001% of failure.

It's a very simple concept.

Incels do not get rejected because they never ask girls out.

I already addressed your faulty reasoning

You did no such thing, you put together pseudo-math, and then just now when I blew out your reasoning with hard numbers and facts, you simply just ignored it.

It's a very simple concept.

As simple as sweeping a floor, but you couldn't get it right.

Bitch, if you have to chase or play games with a woman (all this bird dance bullshit), she doesnt like you and you are just a toy for her to inflate her ego. Women that actually like you will jump on you, ask you out, actively try to engage socially with you, rip your pants off, whatever. Stop being a desperate piece of shit. This doesnt mean you should be a fully blown autist either, just try to pick their interest, play the plausible deniability bullshit, make them be curious about you, never go full retard

Getting dates is nothing like rolling dice, dates are a lot more complicated than rolling dice. All you have to do is put the dice in your hand, shake, and then drop them. Dating takes much more effort.

If all those people are working for Jack the Jackass, yes. But if you notice, all those people in the supply chain of Jack's Chairs are getting paid. Everyone who contributed towards the creation of the chair got a portion of the paycheck from the sale of the chair.
Not only did they get a portion of it, most of them get paid before the chair is even sold.

But, if they're out creating their own chairs in their own business, no. The are creating their own things. If you want to own the means of production, go make your own business. Go source the wood yourself, go source the iron to create the tools, and nails, go source the oil, and the materials to refine it yourself so you can refine it into wood glue.
And if you pay anyone along the lines to source those materials for you, you have to pay them the full value of the chair that was created. Or whatever commie nonsense you're espousing.

You don't seem to understand how 'profit' works.

Of course I do. Everyone in the chain of workers profits. The people getting the wood profit, the people on the factory floor profit, the business owner profits, the share holders profit.
What's the problem here?
There isn't one.

I'll take 'What is Inflation' for 200

Making things easier to get and more accessible is bad?
Sure, inflation can be bad. Inflation is mostly bad for rich people. For people who are in debt, and do not have a lot of money, it's actually good. Because it's easier to get money.
I most certainly did. I didn't make it as clear as I could have, but I did. I made it even more clear for you this time.
That's a completely separate topic, anon. And the very notion of engagement with another person is playing. Her asking you out, or you asking her out is an invitation to play.
It's not a comparison, anon. It's a metaphor.

people keep telling me my metaphor is shit

"No, it couldn't possibly be that my metaphor is bad, and the reasoning is bad"

The metaphor isn't shit, you just don't want it to be true. You will try your best to perceive it as shit, also known as strawmanning. And you're doing this because if it turns out that it isn't shit, and it holds even the tiniest amount of truth, what you believe to be true instantly turns to dust.

If all those people are working for Jack the Jackass, yes

Jack the jackass, sat in his office, and did nothing, while other people put the chairs together, yet "derp, jack made all dose chair'

But, if they're out creating their own chairs in their own business, no. The are creating their own things.

They only made chairs if they own the business, typical corpo talk. We can physical see that the workers in Jack the Jackass's factory physical put all those chairs together, while Jack sat in his office and made money off of other peoples' work

Of course I do. Everyone in the chain of workers profits.

You don't, whenever you hear of 'profit' it is always 'off of' something or someone. Jack the jackass profited off of his workers, because he got rich off of work he didn't do, he just sat and owned stuff. The workers didn't profit off of jack the jackass, because they got paid 15 bucks an hour, when their labor has to be worth more than that for jack to profit in the first place.

What's the problem here? There isn't one.

because you are a smooth-brained corpo simp who is too brainwashed to see one.

Its not a separate topic. You niggers keep crying about being lonely but you dont make yourselves atractive to the oposite gender, you have nothing to offer and, instead of improving yourself, you just cry and try to play the sad, lonely, uncomprehended bitch. You niggers are vaginal powerdryers with the fucking clouds of negativity you carry around. Dont get me started on full blown resigned incels, those are the worst. I know, ive been there, its easy to fall in that kind of mentality, but no, women dont owe you shit for existing, you are a man, act like one or troon out.

I most certainly did

*Completely fails to refute the argument I made with hard logic and numbers, and just ignores it
Read it again retard.

Jack the jackass, sat in his office, and did nothing

If it were not for Jack the Jackass paying the people who built the factory, the factory would not exist, the people on the factory floor would not have jobs and nobody would have chairs.

They only made chairs if they own the business

Silly commie.

whenever you hear of 'profit' it is always 'off of' something or someone.

Silly commie.

I have no interest in debating with an ideologically possessed commie.

crying about being lonely

What? Who are these people you're talking about? I've never done that. You're arguing with a shadow that doesn't exist.

Your metaphor IS SHIT, it was already explained to you by the other guy, you just ignored it because you didn't like it.

I already addressed that point in the PREVIOUS conversation. I'm not going to go over it again, that's just a waste of time.
I also already reiterated it in even more simple terms for you to grasp. If you don't get it, it can't be helped.
It's already been determined that guy isn't very smart. He doesn't understand simply worded ideas, and likes to nitpick at the minutia of detail.

DURRRRRR ur a COMMIE, therefore I AM RIGHT

Jack the jackass didn't build shit, he owned shit, made money off of work he didn't do, and paid other people to make the factories with money he made off of other peoples' work.

if it weren't for Jack, there'd be no chairs

I've heard that retard argument before. Here's the thing, jack is useless. All the workers together could collectively own the factory, manage it through elected representatives, and decide democratically what to do with the revenue. They als would never vote to outsource their own jobs, or pollute their own water, since they live in the area. Meanwhile jack the Jackass has all the incentive in the world to do those things.

Silly cappie

I have no interest in debating further with a corpo smooth-brain.

You just don't want to understand that your metaphor sucks. It was explained to you in detail multiple times. Dating is nothing like rolling dice, it's much harder than that, this is why you keep failing at making a metaphor.

I already addressed that point in the PREVIOUS conversation

No, you FAILED to address, anything. I called you out when your probabilites totaled more than 100%, and had to try to re-work your bad math with schizo-math, and fell short again. I explained it here in this convo in great detail. You then just talked past what I said, and made up some shit about dice that doesn't track with reality. It's not a competition if I'm the only one rolling dice. I recognize your style of boomer bullshit, every time I stumble upon you in a thread, I'm gonna continue to rub your face in the mud. People will know you as the guy "who say's there's a 200% chance of getting a GF today". If nothing else, it will make it hard for you to keep plastering your boomer, just-world fallacy all over the board and waste other incels' time with it.

Oh look another retarded normalfag cope on why ugly "incel" men are constantly rejected by women.

Dont listen to the poltard, hes not me. Every single day the same threads and the same lamentations. Its that meme with the cardboard demons over and over

If Jack was useless, the workers would've built the factory themselves without needing to be paid by him.

So, why didn't the factory exist before Jack came along and had it built?

Dating is nothing like rolling dice

That's a misunderstanding of what a metaphor is. I'm not literally comparing dating to dice rolling, I'm using dice as a metaphor to illustrate the statistical mechanics of dating.
The idea is simple:
The more people you meet, the more likely you are to find someone compatible and as the population increases the amount of people who you are compatible with also increases.
Just like rolling a 10-sided dice:
If you roll a d10 once, your chance of finding the number 3 is 10%
If you roll a d10 twice it's 19%.
If you roll a d10 thrice is 27%

As the population (increase of dice rolls) increases, the likelihood of the number you're looking for increases. If you can refute this point, then refute it. Do not turn it into something else and refute that, like the other guy who can only strawman.

I called you out when your probabilites totaled more than 100%

Already addressed your strawman.
I'm not normal, anon.
I see.

Every single day the same threads and the same lamentations.

That's why I tried to offer something slightly different than the standard slop everyone is consuming day in and day out. Some are addicted to that slop though.

Genetics/ are still internal factors. This is just world fallacy. Do people with clinically retarded iqs just not work hard enough?

Oh so then you're foid on MY BOARD complaining ABOUT MY PEOPLE? Get the fuck out NOW!

So, why didn't the factory exist before Jack came along and had it built?

HMMM, maybe picrl?

He believes dating is EASIER than ever in the modern era, and he backed this up with bad math, I debunked it, and he's coping hard.

Already addressed your strawman.

You presented your argument as it's own strawman, your percentages totaled 200%, I called you out on this, then you said:

quit strawmanning me

I debunked you "if 1% of women would date you, more people means more gooder odds" I explained how that doesn't work, because of competition from more men that also comes with increasing population, and you keep coping about it.

Nope, I'm a man. I'm also not complaining.
Ah, I see. So you agree, he wasn't useless. He provided the capital to pay the workers, and the materials in order for the workers to complete the factory.
If you recall, I said it's easier to find your gf. I've demonstrated exactly how much easier it is through sheer statistics, too.

Are you implying that you are clinically retarded? Genetics might be a factor, but it's not the only one and can be outweighed by others, but since you are comparing your looks to down syndrome, I'd say you are too insecure to find a partner as of this moment. I know the confidence is a catch 22, but I am sure you have plenty of qualities about yourself to be proud of, and that any girl would cherish, so please, focus on what is positive about yourself, not negative.

Ah, I see. So you agree, he wasn't useless. He provided the capital to pay the workers, and the materials in order for the workers to complete the factory.

"My landlord isn't useless, he fixes pipes when things break, even though he gets the money to do that from the rent I pay him"

Profit is measured in terms of value gained versus value lost. So the worker gained $15 but lost 1 hour of his time. If he values $15 more than an hour of his time he profitted. The fact that he continues to go to work proves that he does in fact value $15 more than an hour of his time, proving that he profitted.
The economy is not a zero sum game and is instead created through mutually beneficial transactions. The transactions must be mutually beneficial, otherwise they would not occur as one party would not do the transaction assuming neither is tricked/working with false information. Since the economy works around creating stuff, it is possible for two people to profit in one transaction.

if you double the population then there should be 200 people total, which leads to 1/200 or 0.5% chance of being picked.

Except now there's 2 women who are interested in you. Which goes back to 1%.
2*0.5=1

There's a bunch of other stuff that goes along with it, but it all winds up back at the same 1%.

This is just the same shit, you STILL didn't refute my debunk to all that bullshit, because you are too fucking stupid to understand it. Have fun continue to have all you other conversations ruined in the future.
I'm gonna call you 200PercentTarded from now on.
-Ahem:
So to use your retard example, suppose 1% of women are interested in you
So with 200 people, that's one (1) woman
And with 400 people that's two (2) women

"see odds are more gooder"

But your logic fails when you realize any woman, on average, wouldn't be interested in just one man in your example (though in real life his name is Chad). if they were only interested in one man, that would result in a One-to-One pairing, in which case, population size doesn't matter.

And if they aren't, which would have to be the case for the percentage to always be 1%, they'd have to be interested in more than one person. If it's 1% for me, then it must also be 1% for Bob, and Joe, and every other man in the population. Say the population is 2000 people. So for every one (1) of the 1000 men, there are ten (10) women interested in them, which would total more than the population of 1000 women, so logically for your 1% rule to work, each woman would have to be attracted to 1% of the total male population. Therefore, as the population grows, sure the number of women who would be interested in me would grow, but so to would the number of other men she'd also be interested in.

Read and comprehend it this time, because I'm going to bed now, but I know how you type, I'll be in touch.

I've already addressed this point. I'm not going to address it again.

I know which anon you are.

Take your fucking meds bro