I've noticed a growing trend of cuckservatives pushing for Bachelor taxes to the point where it feels inevitable, particularly in countries where there's a lot of political upheaval like western Europe and America.
Do you have your exit abroad strategies planned if they attempt to genocide incels via punitive economic measures?
I've noticed a growing trend of cuckservatives pushing for Bachelor taxes to the point where it feels inevitable...
incels count as people who can't conceive, and exempt?
hell yeah
I really hate breeders but especially the types like this. They really believe that their baseline biology and primal instincts are the things that should be valued most in life.
You're literally no better than an uncomplex animal at that point.
exit abroad strategies
I will simply kill the politician that proposes the bill
instead of "greater charge on childless", I figure a "cut on families" would have better reception.
cut the taxes on baby products, lower services for homes with confirmed offspring, could even be an adition to married couples.
thus, married + kid 1 + kid 2 + kid 3 get, say, 75% or 80% of their expenses cut (numbers at wall, don't know how it'd be calculated). kids grow with parents and well fed
If women refuse to date me does that count as an exemption?
They'd necessarily have to charge more on childless people if they did that to pay for schools and shit.
it isn't about increasing birth rates it's just about harming people. Men not getting divorce or child support raped are saving too much money and that must be stopped.
Cuckservatives will just claim you're not trying hard enough so no. It's an explicitly boomer minded movement they're utterly detached from reality.
refuse to include boys in society, mass media actively encourages normies to hate them for trivial reasons and keep them excluded
ensure they have no social acceptance and thus zero change of finding a gf and starting a family
then decide you're going to penalize them for being in the pigeonhole they were force dinto
oh yeah, that's going to work out great, but I suppose you can always genocide us with AI drone bombings
Oh. In that case I guess I'd just kill a lot of cuckservatives.
stop subsidizing jews abroad, you'll easily save a few trillion
Cuckservatives ever agreeing to cut funding to israel
lol
lmao
I can't wait for total boomer death and the tradcuck neo-boomers as well.
No, this is a bad idea.
People need to understand that having a child is a CHOICE, and a choice you should make very responsibly.
Meaning, you must be able to not only have enough money to provide for yourself, but for your child, you must have a stable life, and steady health and mental wellbeing.
Any less and you're setting that kid up to be abused.
It should be required by law to have a license before you can become a parent.
Yeah guys, let's rise up and kill a bunch of politicians!
It is absolutely not a boomer minded movement. tradcucks are of all age groups. They once dominated Anon Babble but they got their asses kicked over and over again so they faded out. Now that Trump is back, they have had a sight resurgence. But there's not much anyone can do, when women deem most guys unworthy of sex or relationships. So taxing those guys is very unfair, I wonder if anyone will stand up to it.
They seem very prominent on xitter, I guess that's where all the ones from Anon Babble moved it. It works better for them because they can just blast their dogshit bluetick opinions and block everyone who tells them they're retarded so it's naturally better for them than an open forum like here.
I wonder if anyone will stand up to it.
No one will. Male virgins have no one in their corner. Everyone loves the women no matter what, both tradcucks the left. Anyone that dares even suggest not taxing us will be labeled an incel who hates women and children.
no, the answer is to cut social security; then the childless will be without a familial or state safety net in old age as they should be. and then it wouldn't matter what the "birth rate" is.
Only if they decide to tax me more out of spite for things that are outside my control.
People with kids would still be at a disadvantage there as childless people would be able to save more, while people with kids are basically relying on their kids not just fucking off and leaving them to fend for themselves despite now having no savings. they'd resent that and still push to tax childless people.
No one listens to me when I say this, but you gentlemen need to consider attaching your identity to some sort of protected victim status. Guys do this all the time, the whiny niggers in black lives matter are a great example of that. Attach yourself to race, a mental disability, ANYTHING YOU CAN so the system doesn't target you.
b-but that doesn't fit my ethics and morals
When in Rome, do what the Romans do. We live in an unethical and immoral world.
This only works if you can convince people from outside to give a shit about you, which white single men can't.
Historically not a problem. As long as you don't treat your kids like shit (i.e. kicking them out at 18) they'll generally take care of you. And you're incentivized to have several so that there's less burden on each one plus if one or two are failures or don't want to help you still have the others.
Both the left and the right are in agreement that autistic men are not only not worthy of the same kind of protected minority status as other minorities, but in fact we're villains and deserve to be punished for existing. We are the one acceptable target.
bachelor tax is a good idea but only on women, it makes no sense to tax men who cant decide to have kids. too bad cuckservatives are all gynocentric
Historically people basically didn't move more than 10 miles away from where they were born. Very different in the modern economy where you're expected to be extremely economically mobile and can basically expect to be fired and forced to move 100 miles for a new job at any moment.
Schizo guys attack and kill women over and over again and they get away with it. Sometimes they even kill groups of people and THEY are considered the victims and have to serve no prison time. Women also lost out to trannies, trannies are seen as higher in the victim hierarchy than women.
So it's something to think about. I'm not advocating any crimes by the way, but this is where society is at and if you try to be an honest straight shooter then people are going to fuck you over.
That's a different question, one of economics. You should support mass unionization so that you can't be fired at any moment.
Schizos get away with everything, autistics are punished for everything. We can't win.
Ban no fault divorce and force all women over 140 lbs to take ozempic and then maybe.
Can those people who could not complete military service due to their health who have a large medical book and who have not had girlfriends or relationships be released?
Its the same thing as the dating market. Back when the internet didn't exist you only had to compete with Billy Bob Joe and John Doe down the street. Now you're competing with the world and men that are more good looking and have more resources and status than you can ever hope to attain.
Yes they would rather release them from the world than actually solve the problem
Switzerland takes a different approach. There you have something called the <
"Heiratsstrafe" (marriage penalty). If you marry someone, you legally together count as a single person, meaning you pay a single tax on your combined income. Sinc ethe income in Switzerland is quite high, you'll most likely jump up a tax bracket or two, meaning you effectively pay more taxes than if you had not married. What do you think of this, robots?
I'm not really against helping married people, I just find the idea of punishing single men, a demographic that is already struggling, a completely deranged idea.
Canada briefly had the opposite under Stephen Harper - married couples got to divide their income between them in terms of taxes, so if the man was earning say 80k/year, and the wife was a stay at home mother, they'd basically file taxes as though they were each making 40k/year, letting them stay in a lower tax bracket.
Boomers seethed at this since it meant people could have kids, and when the boomer party (LPC) got elected, they repealed it.
miggers on Anon Babble will say this is a good thing BTW
Theyve tried all sorts of economic incentives in various countries and no one has yet been able to reverse or even really slow the trend of less babies
That's not quite true. Both National Socialist Germany and East Germany had a policy where the the state would cover 25% of the cost of your mortgage (for a modest starter home) for every child you had, and both were able to maintain high birth rates. East Germany's birth rate tanked when it reunified with West Germany and the policy was cancelled.
It is. Whatever fucks shit up and ruins this gay fag society quickest, I'm for it.
idk both options are horrible and consist of making childless people paying much more for no reason
Romans tried it and it didn't work. Unless your endgoal actually is just to collect more taxes, this won't change anything.
One of my favorite late roman laws some cities implemented was that men who earned more than a specific amount a year had to serve on the city council, which was seen as bothersome, so young men just moved to the countryside and fucked rural girls, leaving the city girls in shambles.
We still have 3 times higher birthrates over Japan these boomers need to calm the fuck down until I age out of the tax bracket.
Basedciety is so brutally polarized that people are perfectly ok with the elite openly telling them theyre nothing but slaves, nigger cattle bred to maximize profits to their face if it means they can 'own' and abuse the opposition.
Let that sink in for a second.
What do you think of this, robots?
Its still inherently anti male. Women who want to marry have never had any problem doing so, and benefit from divorce. Many men have to struggle or can't find a wife, and will not benefit from a divorce. So these laws are always about strong arming men to submit to state sponsored relationships where the woman is essentially your handler.
You know what the mafia and corporate America have in common? They both prefer recruiting married men because they have more to lose. The state hates the bachelor because he is free from the bondage of marriage. Its like a tax you can opt of.
It wont though, it'll just shamble on as it always does. They only need to keep enough people happy. Things have been fucked for years but it's kept going by keeping the boomer voters fluffed.
I haven't filed my taxes in 7 years
The nation of nigger lovers deserves all bad things. I hope these next few decades are extremely painful for you, nigger lovers
The nation of nigger lovers deserves all bad things. I hope these next few decades are extremely painful for you, nigger lovers
Stop being antisemitic