Why don't you right wing incel chuds settle for a dominant communist gf?

libertarianism is just being an autist who gets ignored by or becomes a patsy for the ruling class

It seems anti-McDonald's. It has the consoomer meme you'd expect from the kind of person who posts about fast food being bad.

Anarcho communism is, but Marx argued that a socialist transitional period would be required.
Interestingly, no communist nation has ever made it past the point where one guy gets to control everything.

But only if you assume zero scarcity could anarcho communism work. As could literally any other economic system. Because theres no reason to encourage production

Iam a Chud to the core, and nothing will ever change that.
If anyone would be together with she would rather become a chuddy tomboy as i lose my racism and the hatted for niggers ans jews.

Jokes on you! I am autistic, though we are on Anon Babble.
Do note, the ruling class like pointless regulations and licensing, it limits competition.
Im no anarcho capitalist, but we could very reasonably remove income taxes below $50,000, remove all licenses that dont require any test of competence to get, remove minimum wages, remove taxes on small businesses, and remove ALL corporate bailouts that only serve to create monopolies.
You would need large spending cuts to afford this, but its worth it for a more prosperous future.

Communism is retarded. I'm never going to be enough of a normalfag or retarded enough to label myself a communist.

that's dumb and nobody wants that except (You)

Interestingly, no communist nation has ever made it past the point where one guy gets to control everything.

Thankfully that never happened as seem in the party and government organization

But only if you assume zero scarcity could anarcho communism work

So we are in the right path

there's a problem
I'm left wing

You WILL get pegged by a black trans girl and you WILL like it

fixed version origininiininin

Interestingly, wealth and progress are all historically proportional to the freedom of the market. Thats why the UK was so successful in the 1800s and Argentina so successful last year.

Just because freedom is unpopular, doesnt mean it doesnt work

Argentina so successful last year.

lmao

Due to statist policies in my country, I cannot afford many pixels. I hope what you can make out of my graph is sufficient

i hope you and your country suffer the same success argies had to

I don't get it. Is the girl in the second pic the girl in the first pic? Why is she alone in the second pic?

Inflation falling by an order of magnitude? Predicted 5%GDP growth in 2025? First budget surpluses in 70 years?
Boy I would love that success!

we are their neighboors and talk to them everyday i hope you get what you wish for

Thats why the UK was so successful in the 1800s

nigga everyone was in debt to england after the napoleonic wars and they colonised the rest of the world, seizing vast amounts of wealth and natural resources during the opium wars, the raj and the scramble for africa. they also protected their home markets with tariffs, this is libertarianism in a nutshell, ahistorical and incapable of seeing the bigger picture

Sooo why does cuba has a better life expectancy than the USA? Why URSS got to space first and made huge progress in spacial tech like sattelites?

and Argentina so successful last year.

lol, this just shows how stupid this is

Leftist women always get butthurt when I explain how bloated governments running deficit budgets impoverish the working class.

Dominate women do not exist. If they did, I would, but alas.

Economic freedom correlates with prosperity
Economic regulation and restrictions correlate with poverty.

nigga is posting charts and ignoring actual historical facts

Quick someone post that graph of ideology girls pegging their polar opposite

What a retarded edit. It removes the joke and leaves nonsense.

That's how they work, they don't know how to use data and just see the funny numbers

There are many historical facts which are contained by that image
History is full of failed economic strategies which were centrally planned
Argentina promoted domestic manufacturing through high tariffs on imports and subsidies for local industries.
Initial success in industrial growth, especially in textiles and food processing.
Eventually suffered from inefficiency, lack of competition, and economic stagnation.
Brazil put a 100% tariff on Computers and electronics trying to protect their domestic computer industry
youtu.be/brOtbWIViWM
This didn't make Brazil higher tech. It made Brazil lower tech
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economic_liberalisation_in_India
India Adopted ISI after gaining independence in 1947, heavily influenced by socialist and nationalist ideas.

Emphasized public sector control of heavy industry and restricted foreign investment.

While it built a diverse industrial base, inefficiencies, low productivity, and bureaucracy hindered growth, leading to liberalization in 1991.

nigga thinks argentina stagnated because of ISI and not because of peronism and a reorientation towards the eastern bloc in general. that's what happens when you're a LATAM country and you don't make nice with the US

bullshit retard all communist women are lesbians for some reason

But the soviet sphere was an alternate sphere of influence. Cuba couldn't trade with the United States but they got subsidized fuel from the USSR. Countries who had trade embargoes with the United States had trade deals with the Comintern

you need to stop msolely thinking about thing in economic terms my nigga. focus on policy and ideology