Why are some women offended by sw?

I don't wish to presume the amentioned's intelligence.

men pointed out how degenerate OF was and women came out in droves to say sw is hecking valid and that men couldn't handle women being in control of their own bodies. it normalised women taking the easy route of making money by selling their bodies with decreased judgement. and now that people have successfully been conditioned to expect a women making "lowkey" sexual content (thirst traps, bikini pics, etc) to make "high key" sexual content like OF, its a big issue.

women seem to not understand the ramifications of the direction they lead men in

dont approach women

why arent men approaching women anymore

masculinity is toxic

why aren't men men anymore

stop your benevolent sexism

why arent men chivalrous anymore

im strong and independent

why aren't men willing to pamper and provide for me anymore

its extremely destructive for a society, because women say they want something, then society bends over backwards to try and achieve it. issue is, it's either built on a false premise (like the pay gap) so cannot be achieved without even worse discriminatory practices towards men. or women didn't actually know what exactly they wanted or the ramifications of it, so when it's seemingly achieved, women are still frustrated and the goal post moves to something else over and over, in an attempt to try and make women happy

Cant you guys just say sexwork

Just say what it is, prostitution

Because they have a very "nimby" (not in my backyard) worldview.
"Yeah, i'm all for sex workers. I'm pro sex worker but anti john"
"I'm insulted to be called a sex worker"
But it shouldn't be insulting if there is nothing wrong with being a sex worker.

than interesting, unique people?

Are they?

Or that

women are dumb useless cunts who have never achieved anything of note and never will. their primary objective and function is to oppose and undermine male genius and progress; see charlotte corday, all those dumb sluts in ancient rome, etc.

Yes. Try actually making friends with nice women who share your interests. Not for sex, just for the friendship.

that is a pretty weird comment

You can't fuck a brain or an isolated personality that exists only as an idea
Women can be interesting while also having a hot body, this isn't mutually exclusive. Same way a man can be attractive and also funny, like is it one or the other?

You sent this message via the internet. Which is only possible thanks to the groundbreaking scientific work of Madam Curie.
This is true, but in the context of the original post it appeared to be someone asking for sexual images of a woman in the comments of a non pornographic video.
Its reasonable for women to want be able to appear in public without being sexualised, and it isnt even like the guy is asking to go out with her, he just wants nudes.

i don't give a shit about science nonsense

Ok?
Then the third largest Christian denomination resulted from the reforms of picrel.
As did the English poor laws for 300 years, the creation of Great Britain, and the foundation of British colonialism. Not bad for one woman.

She's not wrong for not wanting to be sexualised. It gets into slippery slope territory. In a perfect world there would be no incels, no unwanted sexualization of random women, etc, etc, but posting pics on the internet for anyone to comment on is going to have a mixed bag.
It ain't our fault indians and horny coomers exist that see a pic of a random woman and immediately think "booba"
If a man is straight, he'll eventually look at a woman and want her

This. Fuck science. It ain't even real. Science can eat a dick.

Nta but british colonialism was kinda bad.

Try actually making friends with nice women who share your interests.

I have never met a woman - nice or otherwise - who shares my interests.

I agree that its to be expected. But shes also allowed to be upset about it.
The internet is a pretty sucky place, thats why wise people lurk and never post.

Both are true. So are we going to shag now or shag later?
I had to do it. I had to sexualize minors on the internet, there was no other choice.
In minecraft

Eh, better than the Belgians.
Regardless, notable achievements was the standard, the British empire was irrefutably notable.
What are your interests anon?

thats why wise people lurk and never post

They did le studies on this and the most aggravating and annoying people were responsible for most posts/content/engagement. Interesting

Better than

Still very very bad and inhumane.

Difference is that CP is criminal. Being leery in womens comment sections is unlikely to be considered sexual harassment.
True, best of a bad bunch at a bad time in history. Still not relevant to the point though.

listen, i understand that this is an unpopular sentiment around these parts, but not every women is literally the same person

No, I mean you. What do we do now? Cause i'm feeling kind of romantical right now.
The original comment wasn't asking for her to make an of. It is a down bad horny dude wishing she had an OF.

I'm speaking in generalizations. Depends where you're at women will be more liberal or conservative and have all kinds of interests. Not all women are (x) besides having pussies and two x chromosomes.

Not relevant if you just want to bring up important people, like how one might bring up Hitler if you talk about the accomplishments of Germans/Austrians in this world.
Still wouldn't use it to point to how women throughout history benefitted humanity.
All I'm saying is, choices.

all these things are shit. the CofE was created so her dad could divorce his wife btw.
the british empire had zero cultural or intellectual achievements.

CofE was created so her dad could divorce his wife btw.

Those changes were repealed by Henrys act of six articles. He died a catholic at the head of a functionally Catholic Church. Radical reforms were made under Edward, and promptly reversed under Mary. The CofE only adopted its core policies such as the Media Via under Elizabeth, and she successfully navigated Puritan and Catholic threats to make a stable enough religious settlement to last until the modern day.

british empire had zero cultural or intellectual achievements.

Abolition of Slavery, vaccines, trains, the Industrial Revolution, the telegram, the Atomic model, countless literary works, reflecting telescopes, the telephone, photography, radio, Joseph Swans lightbulb, postage stamps, are you historically illiterate?

The CofE only adopted its core policies such as the Media Via under Elizabeth, and she successfully navigated Puritan and Catholic threats to make a stable enough religious settlement to last until the modern day.

only because the CofE has cosmetic differences between it and other christian churches

Abolition of Slavery,

substituted with colonialism and exploitation of the proleteriat

vaccines, trains, the telegram, the Atomic model, reflecting telescopes, the telephone, photography, radio, Joseph Swans lightbulb, postage stamps

all science nonsense

countless literary works

all inferior to continental literature

are you historically illiterate?

you clearly don't know what intellectual achievements are. hint: they're not material achievements paid for by the opium wars, the scramble for africa and the raj. empiricists don't own history btw, most of it was invented by the romans and early christians.

CofE has cosmetic differences

The CofE has significant doctrinal differences that could have torn the country apart if not navigated well.
For example, Archbishop Grindall refused to work over the Prophesying controversy. Furthermore, Elizabeths ability to reconcile moderate conservatives with radical reformists into the same church is completely unlike any other contemporary denomination. Sure she had some sticking points, such as the vestarian controversy, but she was able to convince reformists to meet in the middle.

substituted with colonialism and exploitation of the proleteriat

Not having a high salary is not comparable to slavery. And the British also enforced the abolition on other countries at the cost of around 2000 sailors, see the blockade of Africa.

science nonsense

He says on his internet connected device. Revolutionary scientific progress is an intellectual achievement.

inferior to continental literature

Subjective. And your claims was ZERO achievements, not that you personally dislike them.

Romans and early Christians invented history

What does this have to do with the British empire?

For example, Archbishop Grindall refused to work over the Prophesying controversy. Furthermore, Elizabeths ability to reconcile moderate conservatives with radical reformists into the same church is completely unlike any other contemporary denomination. Sure she had some sticking points, such as the vestarian controversy, but she was able to convince reformists to meet in the middle.

counterpoint: none of this gay shit ever matters

Not having a high salary is not comparable to slavery

materially, it is. slaves and proles lived in comparable conditions.

And the British also enforced the abolition on other countries at the cost of around 2000 sailors, see the blockade of Africa.

the british used military force to overthrow noncompliant governments? if only there was a word for this...

He says on his internet connected device.

so fucking what, without british empiricists being gay and dumb we'd still have sex slaves

Revolutionary scientific progress is an intellectual achievement.

it's a material achievement of dubious value, read qutb

And your claims was ZERO achievements, not that you personally dislike them.

my claim is that it's not an achievement if it's shit

What does this have to do with the British empire?

nothing, if you don't get my point i'm not surprised

Not for sex, just for the friendship.

Men and women can't just be friends, sorry.

I dont care about religion

No, but the 110 million anglicans worldwide do. Your personal indifference does not make it practically insignificant.

slaves and proles lived in comparable conditions.

Massive regional differences, and the abolition allowed a degree of social mobility, even if it took a while to come into effect. We also see wage and productivity growth post abolition which wouldnt have been feasibly possible without competitive labour.

british used military force to overthrow noncompliant governments?

No, they made treaties with other nations by which they would enforce voluntarily adopted abolition. This made it easier for countries to ban slavery without having to use their own navies to prevent illegal trafficking of slaves. At no point did the Brits invade anyone to end slavery by force.

I hate science and want sex slaves!

Sex slaves are immoral and the future is now thanks to science, old man.
But seriously, the abolition of sex slavery is a major cultural achievement and should be praised as an example of morality overpowering hedonism. If you view other people as morally void tools for your pleasure, I think were too ideologically diverged to come to an agreement.

material achievement of dubious value

But it is an achievement. And an achievement the whole world benefits from and billions use every day.

read qutb

You mean the author born in the British empire, who spent the vast majority of his life living in the British empire? Seems like a cultural achievement of the British empire.

British literature is SO bad it basically doesnt exist

A Google search for influential writers and the first two are both British. Im Italian BYW, so this isnt regionally biased.

nothing, if you dont get my point im not surprised

Ok, if its completely irrelevant to our discussion, Ill ignore it.

Has tattoos

Questions why people keep asking if she's a sex worker

Why are foids this retarded?

I have friends of the opposite gender.
Picrel

blonde white woman

I don't care she probably has white knights in her comment section by now

No, but the 110 million anglicans worldwide do. Your personal indifference does not make it practically insignificant.

and there is zero practical difference between them and most other christians so who gives a shit

Massive regional differences, and the abolition allowed a degree of social mobility, even if it took a while to come into effect. We also see wage and productivity growth post abolition which wouldnt have been feasibly possible without competitive labour.

bar chart shit, typical brittoid empiricist

At no point did the Brits invade anyone to end slavery by force.

no, they just invaded countries and then abolished slavery in them. completely different

the abolition of sex slavery is a major cultural achievement and should be praised as an example of morality overpowering hedonism. If you view other people as morally void tools for your pleasure, I think were too ideologically diverged to come to an agreement.

you're a fag and a subhuman

But it is an achievement. And an achievement the whole world benefits from and billions use every day.

not an INTELLECTUAL achievement though so idc

You mean the author born in the British empire, who spent the vast majority of his life living in the British empire? Seems like a cultural achievement of the British empire.

egypt was a protectorate, not part of the british empire. qutb also never identified with the empire

A Google search for influential writers and the first two are both British

both shit and gay though

practical difference between them and most other christians

From a Christian perspective there are several major differences. They run a bishop system, they believe in the 7 solas, they follow media via and BCP. Its also important to not that the success of Anglicanism in Africa causes tension in the UK, as the generally liberal British bishops clash on theology with the generally conservative African bishops.
Theres also interesting religious dynamics internal to different African countries, especially Nigeria, where the Anglican south is more peaceful and developed but clashes with the Muslim north.

Statistics bad

Wot

they just invaded countries and then abolished slavery in them

It is true that British colonies were subject to British law, and slavery in colonies was banned in 1833. But thats a good thing, slavery is bad. Both from a moral and economic standpoint.
And it is still true that at no point did the UK invade a country for the purpose of abolishing slavery there.

Youre a subhuman gay if you dont support sex slavery

I generally try to assume the best in people. But what on earth is wrong with you?

Revolutionary scientific progress isnt intellectual

Picrel. Science is an academic matter, therefore intellectual.

Egypt was a protectorate, not part of the british empire

Egypt was a protectorate, but functionally part of the empire in that Britain exercised control over domestic and foreign policy.
But sure, Ill happily disregard his cultural achievements because Ive given a bunch of other more noteworthy examples. Which you address in your next point

I dont like Shakespeare or Orwell

Once again, your personal preference is not objective. Google results have put them top of their list of influential writers, so they clearly had enough influence to favoured by the pageRank. Like it or not, they were influential, and this constitute a major cultural achievement.

I forgor the pic

Many apologies

at what point was it made acceptable to suggest that any woman in the internet you find attractive should literally start sex work

uhhhh probably when they all started dressing and acting like whores all the time??

Congrats, either or both of you are ugly to each other or too far apart

Or we just enjoy talking about our interests and dont need to make everything about sex?

You're either

hole in denial that keeps an orbiter around for attention

orbiter in denial that wants to fuck his "friend" but can't get any

From a Christian perspective there are several major differences. They run a bishop system, they believe in the 7 solas, they follow media via and BCP. Its also important to not that the success of Anglicanism in Africa causes tension in the UK, as the generally liberal British bishops clash on theology with the generally conservative African bishops.

Theres also interesting religious dynamics internal to different African countries, especially Nigeria, where the Anglican south is more peaceful and developed but clashes with the Muslim north.

i'm british and this is a total lie and nobody fucking cares about christianity here except toffs. idgaf about what happens in africa

It is true that British colonies were subject to British law, and slavery in colonies was banned in 1833. But thats a good thing, slavery is bad. Both from a moral and economic standpoint.

when it leads to colonialism because former slave traders need new ways to make money, increased colonial exploitation and the expansion of slums then no it isn't moral, it's replacing a problem that only affects slaves with one that affects the rest of the world.

Science is an academic matter, therefore intellectual.

there are plenty of things taught in universities that aren't intellectual so who cares

functionally part of the empire in that Britain exercised control over domestic and foreign policy.

not directly

your personal preference is not objective. Google results have put them top of their list of influential writers, so they clearly had enough influence to favoured by the pageRank

idc about google results as a metric so suck my nuts gaytard

They have the interest of my penis, im not gonna pretend i want anything to do with a woman besides fucking and shitposting them into disgust. When they're allso sensitive and impossible to please you TAKE ADVANTAGE OF IT

she is right you are wrong fuck off op

Sex work should be legal.

No one in the UK cares about Christianity

Maybe, but historically it was massive. England used to be called Marys Dowry. While you may not personally experience the tensions, they do exist. The LLF movement being an example. Though it sound like youve insulated yourself from religious matters.

I dont care about Africa

The UK has had a massive impact on Africa and it shouldnt be dismissed out of hand.

leads to colonialism because former slave traders need new ways to make money

Colonialism was largely led by private companies seeking natural resources. The African coast was pretty much fully colonised by abolition, and only stuck around as a prestige project. Also slavers were compensated by the government. The debt was paid off in 2019.

it's replacing a problem that only affects slaves with one that affects the rest of the world

Slavery was abolished empire wide in 1833. Please show me on the attached graph where a worldwide poverty crisis is caused by this decision.

there are plenty of things taught in universities that aren't intellectual so who cares

I care, and so should you. Because this is the dictionary definition of your term for your claim. There were massive advances in an intellectual field, meaning there was an intellectual achievement.

not directly

Sure, thats pretty irrelevant to my argument, so Im happy to concede that.

suck my nuts

Lovely.
What metric would you like me to use, if pageRank isnt good enough?

Nta but

Slavery was abolished empire wide in 1833

Except india right.

inb4 they werent slaves and if they were then later on they were debtslaves

India wasnt a British territory at the time.
They were a private company and passed an anti slavery act in 1843

Yes it was a british company territory. Luckily when britain took over from the company those practices were still in place.

Technically it was outlawed in 1843 with the UK taking over in 1858. Practically there was so much autonomy that it wasnt properly enforced until the 1880s.
So while there was mass slavery, it wasnt technically government sanctioned.

Anyway. Its been fun but Im going to sleep

The thing is, these thots are already basically on onlyfans. They are posting their bodies on instagram for attention. People only like their boring shit because they are hot. They are selling softcore porn, except they only get paid in a trickle of attention in most cases. They are retarded whores who don't realise their pimp (Meta) is their pimp.

The UK has had a massive impact on Africa and it shouldnt be dismissed out of hand.

due to colonialism, not christianity

Colonialism was largely led by private companies seeking natural resources. The African coast was pretty much fully colonised by abolition, and only stuck around as a prestige project.

??? i'm talking about colonialism in general, not just africa. learn what the opium wars were

Slavery was abolished empire wide in 1833. Please show me on the attached graph where a worldwide poverty crisis is caused by this decision.

they made the ruling and middle classes in other countries poor, as you very well know

Because this is the dictionary definition of your term for your claim

the dictionary is gay and dumb and inventer by the british

What metric would you like me to use, if pageRank isnt good enough?

decent aesthetic taste that you obviously don't possess

Oh but im not talking about the actual slavery, i was referring to the indentured servants who didnt know they had to go to another continent.
Sure, they weren't slaves but it involved forced labor. And sure, they could get free after a while, which puts them a bit on the same level as roman slaves who could buy their freedom. Went on till the 1920s iirc. It's why there are a lot of indians in south america.