Any thoughts on reformed national socialism? I am a firm believer of it

foreigners are not among us

among us

Will you blow me?

These people still have to comply with the system of checks and balances, even if it sometimes takes a few year and a change in administration to be held accountable for their wrongdoing, and also they are subservient to the public opinion. If they do a bad job, they get ousted after a couple of years, and neither can they rule for more than 2 terms. But you're not okay with that. You want people like them to have unlimited unchecked power over you, where you have no say and no recourse to do anything about it. So I'm asking you again: are you a fucking cuck?

subservient to the public opinion

Clearly you're unfamiliar with the power of the capitalist oligarchy to outspend candidates in primary elections and replace the ones who align with the people rather than billionaires.

neither can they rule for more than 2 terms

"There are ways around that."

You want people like them to have unlimited unchecked power over you, where you have no say and no recourse to do anything about it. So I'm asking you again: are you a fucking cuck?

I can't answer any of that until you explicitly answer to which system you're referring instead of pussyfooting around it.

whats reformed about it

Billionaires didn't want Trump to win, because he promised to wage tariff war on other countries, which would result in all of them losing huge amounts of money. Musk thought he could take advantage of it by aligning with Trump, and failed spectacularly, he lost hundreds of billions of dollars. So why did Trump win?

"There are ways around that."

There aren't. If there were, people would have been doing it already.

I can't answer any of that until you explicitly answer to which system you're referring instead of pussyfooting around it.

To your retarded nazi one, you dumb faggot. It should have been obvious. You cry that America is not a real democracy, but an oligarchy, and your solution to it is to do away with democracy completely and centralize power to a greater degree than it would be in an actual oligarchy. Don't you see how astoundingly retarded that is?

Its all cringe dialects. Niggers sick, immigration is bad. Social cohesion is good, race is real, communism doesn't work the only thing that matters in this world is power.

your retarded nazi one

Look man, America isn't perfect, but that's no reason to call them Nazis. That's an insult to Nazis. They reformed their evil, racist ways and got America to the moon. Nobody cares that Werner von Braun and Charles Lindbergh were Nazis since the US got the first man on the moon.

racism is evil because it is

You will forever be stuck in normalfag hell.

Erm sorry chud, reality has a liberal bias.

OP proclaims his support of national socialism. That's what I'm responding to, but you already know that, you obtuse unfunny faggot.

This time, all the jews will die.

The only way in which the support for any authoritarian system makes sense is if YOU want to be leader. So for example it makes sense for someone like Nick Fuentes to support it, because he wants to be the despot. If you support it, but you don't want to lead, then you're just a cuck that wants to be dominated and subservient to someone else in power, who can do whatever they please with you. And if you think you'll get favors by helping them gain power, then I encourage you to study what happens to the supporters of authoritarian leaders after those leaders gain power. Hint: they get killed, because they pose a threat. And the entourage around the leader will get culled repeatedly and replaced with new people, so don't think you're safe just because you don't get killed during the first wave.

Yeah but I'm not OP
Why were the nazis bad? Was it because of the totalitarian power?
What about the fact that the legislative and executive branches are abdicating their power to the executive branch and effectively creating a totalitarian state?
Was it because of the concentration camps? CECOT is a concentration camp, and more are being built all over the world.
Why were the Nazis bad? Are they still bad in that way, and if so, is there anyone who currently does that same thing but more?

I am a bit skeptical that you capable of that,the last time was your last real chance.
Even original nazism barely attracted capable people mostly junkies and chuds,reformed seems dead on arrival.

*legislative and judicial
they are cucked by Trump and you know it. Too fat off free shrimp. I'm looking at you, Lindsey Graham.

It really really doesn't though

Spoken like a true white diplomat :^)

Why were the nazis bad? Was it because of the totalitarian power?

That's one of the reasons, yes. It's being ruled by someone who has complete power over the population and who can do whatever, with no oversight or checks whatsoever, but on top of that introduce a draconian system to control the thoughts of the population, to instantiate a cult of personality around the leader, where you get killed if you don't comply. If you genuinely want that, then this is as cucked as it gets. Of course nazism was uniquely terrible, in that it is expansionist in nature, which requires the nation to be constantly at war, like a malignant cancer, but also views people of certain ethnicities as vermin that needs to be exterminated. But again, you already know that.

What about the fact that the legislative and executive branches are abdicating their power to the executive branch and effectively creating a totalitarian state?

But that's not what's happening in America. A judge agreeing with the decision of the current administration isn't equivalent to the judiciary branch relinquishing their power. If you're unhappy with what's happening currently, then my answer to you is merely this: give it time. It might take a few years, perhaps a change in the administration, but the people responsible will be held accountable, provided there's evidence of it.

Was it because of the concentration camps?

Come on now. The nazi ones weren't mere concentration camps, poltard kvetching notwithstanding. Their purpose was to exterminate people. CECOT is a maximum security prison, albeit one with terrible living conditions. If you want to draw parallels with whatever current administration you don't like, be it with Trump and CECOT, Obama and Guantanamo, etc., you can do that, but the analogies break down at certain point. And here that point is that none of those modern prisons' purpose is to genocide people.

Without due process and with the reason being "I didn't like his hat", yeah it's a concentration camp.

If the legal process indeed wasn't properly followed by the current administration, then again, give the legal processes time. I can even grant you that CECOT functions as a concentration camp, but its purpose still isn't to exterminate massive groups of people in an industrialized manner. I understand that it might be tempting for you to paint analogies between what the current American administration is doing and what the nazis did, because it might appear to you to be expedient politically speaking, but those analogies break down at some point. So you're not really winning anyone over by doing this, because anyone who is familiar even with basic historical facts around WW2 will also know where that point is. But Trump doesn't need to be literally Hitler for the things he does to still be bad, so it's strange to me that it's the hill that you want to die on, instead of adopting a more reasonable stance.

"Modern day Nazis are more reasonable than Republicans" is a reasonable stance and it's very funny to me that you're coping with walls of text.

Modern day Nazis are more reasonable than Republicans

A modern day republican still believes in principles such as the rule of the people, freedom of speech, generally basic liberal principles that give you any sort of agency as an individual withing a nation. Even if Trump has his cult following that believes he can do no wrong, those people still wouldn't generally support outright instantiating a dictatorship with Trump as the supreme leader, believe it or not, as that would go against Republican values. A modern day nazi on the other hand is literally a cuck that explicitly wants to give all his autonomy up to some central authority, while dreaming of exterminating people he doesn't like. So I think it's detrimental to say shit like this, because being hysterical with your analogies discredits your more valid criticisms of the Trump administration.

A modern day republican still believes in principles such as the rule of the people, freedom of speech, generally basic liberal principles that give you any sort of agency as an individual withing a nation.

Rip Van Winkle over here reminiscing about the Republican party of 110 years ago

ut on top of that introduce a draconian system to control the thoughts of the population,

Is this literally not what democrats do and hope to achieve?

Its bad when Trump does it but was it bad when Biden was doing it?

Modern day liberals don't believe in any of these values however. What is your entire point?

So so far arguments against nationalism

ummm its like bad because its bad

umm basically you are a cuck if you abide by the laws of the state you voted against

arguments against nationalism

here is the best argument against nationalism
orwell.ru/library/essays/nationalism/english/e_nat

i dont know what the reformed part means but the nazi larp must be abandoned, its an important step in bringing back illiberalism and ethnonationalism to european people.

It's a feature of totalitarian states, and it's what differentiates them from more general authoritarian ones. But it's also not something that was unique to nazi Germany. E.g. it also applied to soviet Russia under Stalin, or is still prominent to this day in North Korea. And I don't really have good reasons to believe that this is what Democrats want to achieve, at least not the vast majority of Democrats.
It might be. I don't know. What is it that he did?

Modern day liberals don't believe in any of these values however. What is your entire point?

Liberal philosophy is not the same as the belief system that a particular group of liberals might subscribe to. Republicans by and large believe in liberal philosophical principles, as do Democrats. Here I mean things like freedom of speech, democracy, etc., so something that a Republican might call "American values", even if they come from liberal philosophy.

Listen, if you're a nationalist, but you still support democracy and don't want to have a despot ruling over you and controlling what you can or can't think, then god bless you, you can go on your merry way. I don't agree with you, but I don't think you're a fucking cuck.