Asuka fags never beating the allegations

the other way around for me
I would have mocked them as a 16yo chud and would have told them to do that in front of muslims
now I know better than projecting my own insecurities on minorities

fantasy ain't reality anon, if they wanted to fuck red headed 14yos they can find them

It's not about "projecting insecurites"
I just think it would be funny to watch them get attacked

Right, it just feels like a clown show any more where both sides are just feeding on the other and the moment one stops giving the other one attention, they'll die away.

i'm literally talking about the word "allegations", not your shitty gay anime dumb autist faggot

Speaking of never beating the allegations, Christianity is not doing a good job of beating the allegations that it is an ancient jewish psyop created to turn white people into sissy cucks. In historical times it still had some gusto and fervor and European knights actually went out and slayed, but the pathetic state it is in now speaks for itself. I agree that they should taunt muslims (and jews) and fight them physically.

The allegations is that asuka is bbc only

I agree that they should taunt muslims

It's kinda useless to taunt a religion that barely has any influence in US politics when christianity is actively oppressing them

when christianity is actively oppressing them

Do you have a single fact to back that up

"allegations"

is word that existed for at least hundreds of years, sir ESL

Asuka is totally a pawg that has a thing for shy Asian shotas. Based.

anti-abortion activism is almost entirely christcuck-backed

go be a nigger somewhere eIse

Most of the arguments against it are secular

life begins at conception, scientifically

you shouldn't end a human life with malice aforethought, that's murder

Why are cosplayers like this though?

wigger asuka tards vs sophisticated rei loners

Jesus who allowed this cow to play a slim character? I fucking hate fat girls they look like absolute shit and their fat rolls have pits full of bacteria and shit

dress up for attention

why is this bitch seeking attention

it is truly a mystery

What's up with Evangelion fags and being trannies. There has to be some psychological and subliminal phenomenon with this show

Scientists say that babies are only babies after they're born, before then they're fetuses and you can abort 'em
It's the fundamentalist loonies who say that "some poem in the Bible says that God knew me as a fetus so there, fetuses are universally viable human lives. Never mind the commandments to kill babies or the abortion procedure listed in the Old Testament."

The bitch twreking is the same type bitch complaining about being objectify

Scientists say that babies are only babies after they're born

This is not true. Even if it was, I didn't say "babies" I said "life". A fetus is still a human life, scientifically.

Again, I don't even have to invoke religion to be against abortion.

A fetus is still a human life

So, what's a miscarriage?

A dead fetus? I don't know what you're getting at.

So you're a cuck. You enjoy being cuckolded.

A miscarriage is a fetus. So, you want women to carry dead fetuses and go into septic shock?

Can you tell me why murder is wrong without invoking religion?

What? No. It's dead, it should be removed, like any dead body.

Wrong in what way? It's against the law. So you'll be punished for it.

You just said that fetuses were human lives, and so now it's illegal to remove them, even if they're dead. You should have answered more wisely, Richard.

You're saying that abortion should be illegal because muder is wrong. Why is it wrong? Is murder wrong because it's illegal?

This mf arguing like he's on xitter lmfao

Yes also the law is perfect and given to George Washington by God on Mount Vernon I learned it in Sunday school

That doesn't make sense, corpse removals happen every day.

I never said murder was wrong, I said murder was illegal. Can you argue without speaking for me?
Abortion is murder.

No U faglord

That doesn't make sense

Well, then stop saying that fetuses are human lives. Sometimes they're not viable human lives, and you don't get to decide when that is. A woman and her doctor do.

I'm not "saying that". It's just what they are, by definition.

Your conclusion doesn't follow logically. Animal abuse is illegal yet meat factories are allowed and animals get slaughtered. So, some lives are more important than others. Why should I care about babies of Chad and Stacy? Their lives are equivalent to a pig for me.

So a dead fetus, by being a fetus, is by definition, alive?

Babies can be born 3 months early and live, whats the fucking difference between those individuals and the ones who've been in there 6 months and wont be out until 9?

What if the woman cheated when she got pregnant? The bible says that it's OK to abort the baby in that case and doesn't put a term limit on it.

What the fuck are you talking about
Dead is dead, alive is alive whether they are in the womb or not. Fetuses can die, but unless they are dead they should not be removed.

Are you ESL or something? Or do you think you're making a point?
If something dies, it's no longer alive.

Livestock slaughter is not animal abuse, by legal definition. If you're torturing your livestock, it is animal abuse.

Who gives a FUCK what the bible says retard, don't dodge the question like you dodge responsibility.

Dead is dead, alive is alive

If something dies, it's no longer alive.

Tell me you're young without telling me.

I can't believe there is somebody this retarded on planet earth.

Your reasoning is circular. Livestock slaughter is not animal abuse according to current legal system, just like how abortion is not murder in most countries. You're not giving any reasons for why it should even be considered as murder. Some lives are more important than others, so I don't see how unborn babies getting slaughtered is any different from pigs getting slaughtered.

You're not giving any reasons for why it should even be considered as murder.

The only reason I have is the legal one: Ending a human life with malice aforethought.
It's premeditated murder, by definition.

Livestock slaughter is not animal abuse

Yes, we do it as quickly and humanely as possible, without making the animal suffer before it dies

Some lives are more important than others

Human > Animal. Yeah, sure I'll give you that.

Vegan opinions are not important. Animals are property. Humans are humans.

we do it as quickly and humanely as possible, without making the animal suffer before it dies

Same as an abortion?
For me, Born babies > Unborn Babies = Animals
So, why should it be illegal?
What makes you think I'm a vegan? I love boiled dogs.

i think its "theomgcosplay"

Same as an abortion?

You're applying a status of "personhood" that dependent on location
If you happen to be inside a womb, you aren't a person, which is arbitrary
By your definition, I could go into a maternity ward, find a woman going into labor, reach in and pop that kid's head and I didn't really do anything, it wasn't born yet

By your definition, I could go into a maternity ward, find a woman going into labor, reach in and pop that kid's head and I didn't really do anything, it wasn't born yet

And when did I say otherwise? You should tell me why what you did was wrong.

There is a fundamental disagreement that would put unborn babies = to animals for any retard like you while humans are always human for us, born or not.

its not murder if *arbitrary position that I define*

Therefore I define you as being in an arbitrary place that allows you to be murdered

my rights are being infringed!

You infringe the baby's rights by killing them.

You should tell me why what you did was wrong.

I just murdered someone

Life and death are redefined by the day. Heart death used to be considered death. Certain types of brain death can be reversed, though in your case it may be too late. Fetuses may appear alive but be unviable. I don't trust a fucking idiot newfag to life like you to decide where the line is.

humans are always human for us, born or not

Why is that (without invoking religion, which was the premise of this argument)?
And your strawman doesn't work. I don't think murder is wrong in the first place. It's an arbitrary law defined purely due to religious beliefs.
No, you didn't. You put down an animal.

You put down an animal.

What is it about the traversal through a vagina gives a person the magical status of being a person
How far out does it have to come out before it becomes wrong to stab it

It's a "person" in both contexts, but in one situation, it's life is of a lesser value, just like how a nigger has a lesser value than a White man.

just like how a nigger has a lesser value than a White man.

Based, but that's not what we're talking about here.

its life is of a lesser value

Yeah, that's where the anti-abortion crowd has an issue. Why is this? Location? Because it needs help surviving?

How the fuck are you going to revive a fetus in a womb? And if you can you should!

genetic disability

I don't think we should be playing eugenics like that

pregnancy will cause death of mother

This is the moral grey area where theres a necessary evil being committed. But it doesn't make abortion NOT an evil. And in fact in terms of morality I would say the sacrifice of a mother for her child is probably more noble, though it shouldn't be mandated.
You can define someone as not being fully alive until they have conscious thought, that would allow for infanticide up to like age 2
You could define it as whenever the baby is able to live outside the womb, which would put it somewhere around 6 months of developmemt time but is dependent on technology
You could put it at heartbeat which is quite early in the pregnancy but has a strict definition.
The line is fucking arbitrary when its scientifically true that life begins a sperm fertilizes an egg and it implants. There is a unique human being at that point and their life should be protected. Yeah theres natural situations where a pregnancy suddenly ends and thats a tragedy, but its only somebody's fault when its caused by somebody, like a doctor aborting it, a criminal shooting the mother, or the mother poisoning the baby and herself.
I just can't condone this shit, it happening up to the 9 month mark disgusts me I don't fucking care how rare it is. Its a crime against children.
That women try to fucking celebrate this shit, that their politics are centered around it, that they think the biological purpose of their bodies is a sin against themselves and that they flippantly procreate in situations they wouldn't actually want to do so in.
ABORTION IS NOT BIRTH CONTROL.
There are situations where its necessary and should be legal, but it should be fucking RARE.

pregnancy will cause death of mother

C-Sections remove almost 100% of the arguments like this anyway

to be fair you were hating on them just as the social engineering was in its full swing. Rewatching old shows aimed at kids/teens and its full of "ok boomer, let me be liberal"

It's a combination of factors, location being one of them. Unborn nigger babies are inferior to unborn White babies, but a born baby has more value than both of them.
Same as how "people" in Africa are inferior to Europeans irrespective of race. A White man is superior to niggers irrespective of location, but a White man in Europe has more value than a White man in South Africa. Unborn babies are inferior to born babies irrespective of race.

i don't think murder is wrong in the first place

I have no clue what moral framework leads somebody to this conclusion. If you think it is morally acceptable to kill somebody for whatever reason you like then prepare to die I guess. Anti-murder laws are a protection for everybody because people don't want to die. Wanting them removed is a suicidal ideation.

hurrr nuh uh I'd totally kill all the people I don't like and never get killed myself

prepare to die I guess

You can try.

Yeah ok senator armstrong.

might makes right and I'm the strongest

NOOOOOO I CAN'T BELIEVE THE WEAK ARE WILLINGLY GROUPING UP TO PUNISH ME FOR ATTACKING THEM NOOOOOOO I DON'T WANT TO HANG FOR THE CRIME OF MURDER YOU CANT JUST TELL ME WHAT TO DO STOPSTOPSTOOOOOOPPP

As if every other fanart turning her into a negrified hag wasn't insulting enough. Never a smelly fat slag doing the ghetto butthole dance. That's not my Asuka. Something like picrel is more accurate and alluring to the cultured Asuka admirer.

From a practical, pragmatic perspective, I guess most people see the unborn as less valuable than the born, because a mother is able to just have another.

But the main argument is that it shouldn't be fine to murder them, especially for arbitrary reasons like "Meh, I don't feel like taking care of this right now." or "I don't think it'll grow up in a mansion."

You're arguing with a strawman. If someone is weak, he deserves to die. If I turn out to be weak, so be it. Or do you also believe that all races have equal value and we should be importing millions because human life is precious?

It is possible I can make very little of myself; but this little is everything, and better than what I allow to be made out of me by the might of others, by the training of custom, religion, the laws, the State.

But the main argument is that it shouldn't be fine to murder them, especially for arbitrary reasons

The same argument is used for importing millions of niggers because human life is something to be preserved and their home country is "dangerous" for them to live.

The same argument is used for importing millions of niggers because human life is something to be preserved and their home country is "dangerous" for them to live.

People don't have a right to "thrive" or "prosper", that's up to themselves.

So, we should let them live? And how do you plan to prevent them from entering on boats without killing them?

No retard, consequentialism vs deontology. Not importing the third world isn't a direct action to kill somebody, and often importing these immogrants IS a direct action to kill somebody.

There's an argument to made here:
You should let them live and just send them back to wherever they came from.
Or you should kill them because they are invading your country.

Either way, they shouldn't be there.

This is the moral grey area where theres a necessary evil being committed. But it doesn't make abortion NOT an evil. And in fact in terms of morality I would say the sacrifice of a mother for her child is probably more noble, though it shouldn't be mandated.

You can define someone as not being fully alive until they have conscious thought, that would allow for infanticide up to like age 2

You could define it as whenever the baby is able to live outside the womb, which would put it somewhere around 6 months of developmemt time but is dependent on technology

You could put it at heartbeat which is quite early in the pregnancy but has a strict definition.

The line is fucking arbitrary when its scientifically true that life begins a sperm fertilizes an egg and it implants. There is a unique human being at that point and their life should be protected. Yeah theres natural situations where a pregnancy suddenly ends and thats a tragedy, but its only somebody's fault when its caused by somebody, like a doctor aborting it, a criminal shooting the mother, or the mother poisoning the baby and herself.

I just can't condone this shit, it happening up to the 9 month mark disgusts me I don't fucking care how rare it is. Its a crime against children.

That women try to fucking celebrate this shit, that their politics are centered around it, that they think the biological purpose of their bodies is a sin against themselves and that they flippantly procreate in situations they wouldn't actually want to do so in.

ABORTION IS NOT BIRTH CONTROL.

There are situations where its necessary and should be legal, but it should be fucking RARE.

mental gymnastics

Not importing the third world isn't a direct action to kill somebody

How do you stop them from entering the country without killing them?
Why would you let them live? That's admitting that they have the same value as you and deserve to live.

Why would you let them live? That's admitting that they have the same value as you and deserve to live.

I'm just laying out both sides
Me, personally? I'm totally fine with killing them.

Damn... I don't even care if she's a spade queen/ I would.

That argument is the same as the abortion debate. There's no moral dilemma in either case for me, some lives just have lesser value.

Except one is a life you made with your own actions
And the other is just some guy deciding he gets to live in your house because his old one was dirty

And why are those two situations different?

iwn be her

life is not fair

How do you stop them from entering the country without killing them?

Countries have a right to control their borders.
Otherwise another country will just invade and implement their stupid morality in your place. An invading force can be met with a lethal response. In terms of war and self-defense thats slightly better than just "let me kill anybody I personally want to for any reason whatsoever"

Are you being obtuse?
I just laid out why they are different. One you cause, and the other happens to you.

iwn rape you

Life is unfair

Even if the country fights, the end result is the same. Inferior lives will end and superior lives will prevail. Why do you need to make excuses to preserve them in some conditions but not in others?
How does it matter? I should be able to end inferior lives irrespective of anything.

How does it matter?

Are you speaking existentially? It doesn't.
But we live in a society, bottom text. Making a life on purpose just to snuff it out is unnecessary, malicious and cruel.

But now you're just going

why can't I kill anyone I want

Which is not how a society works

How does it matter?

Cutting yourself while chopping onions is exactly the same as me stabbing you, by this logic.

The society currently says that niggers have equal (or more) value as the White man, that a woman is as capable as a man, and that men can become women. I guess that is perfectly fine and true?

malicious and cruel

Meaningless words.
Yes, you're inferior in both cases if you can't defend yourself.

youtube.com/watch?v=xCFEk6Y8TmM

The society currently says that niggers have equal (or more) value as the White man, that a woman is as capable as a man, and that men can become women. I guess that is perfectly fine and true?

Okay, you're getting a little schizophrenic.
I said we live in a society, not that it was perfect or correct about everything.

Yes, you're inferior in both cases if you can't defend yourself.

That's not what I'm saying: I'm saying, by your logic, it's either a crime to cut yourself while chopping onions or it isn't a crime to stab you. But I'm willing to bet you'll call the cops when you're accosted.

ass asuka
assuka

I said we live in a society, not that it was perfect or correct about everything.

Why is it correct about murder but not about trannies or niggers? It's wrong about basically everything.

you'll call the cops

No, I can defend myself, unlike inferior bitches.

I decide whether it is the right thing in me; there is no right outside me. If it is right for me, it is right. Possibly this may not suffice to make it right for the rest; that is their care, not mine: let them defend themselves. And if for the whole world something were not right, but it were right for me, i. e. I wanted it, then I would ask nothing about the whole world. So every one does who knows how to value himself, every one in the degree that he is an egoist; for might goes before right, and that - with perfect right

Okay, okay, you're a badass.
What about your mom? Your wife if you have one? Or if you have a kid? If someone kills them, is that the same as them dying naturally? You'll just shrug and say "They were inferior"?

I will defend them because it's right for me. If I can't, it means I'm inferior and that's the end of the story.

Good to know you can be everywhere at once, and you can stop things like cars and bullets. I'd love to learn this power.

And you wouldn't even call the cops to try and get it solved either.
You're either shitposting or retarded

Do you think calling the cops will prevent their killing? Does murder being illegal mean that they won't die? What difference does the law make? Legality matters after the incident has already happened.
And it's really telling that you didn't infer that I will teach them how to defend themselves. If they can't defend themselves even then, I will be sad, but that wouldn't change the fact that they were inferior. I would kill their killer because I feel it would be right.

And it's really telling that you didn't infer that I will teach them how to defend themselves.

You can teach a woman or child all the MMA and gun handling you want, but it usually goes out the window once they get punched in the face one time

I will be sad, but that wouldn't change the fact that they were inferior. I would kill their killer because I feel it would be right.

Why though? If things happening to you and things you cause are exactly the same, there's no reason to go after the killer. It's the same as them dying of cancer, or old age.
Your logic doesn't follow

When did I say women and children are equal to men? I've been saying exactly the opposite. They're obviously inferior. I can only try to make them superior than their peers and try to protect them as far as I can. If they still get killed, I will be sad, and kill the killer. If you follow the legal procedure, there's no guarantee that the guy would even be in prison.

Your logic doesn't follow

If you cut yourself or get killed, both situations only prove you're inferior. But I never said revenge is out of the question. You didn't read what I quoted . I decide what is right based on the situation. Lives aren't inherently equal, I decide the value each life has.

You're sidestepping the whole argument, don't get caught up in the hypotheticals.
You said that there was really no difference between things happening to you and causing things to happen yourself.
This is stupid for a number of reasons:

me breaking into your house = you inviting me in

me killing your friends and family = them dying of natural causes

me stealing your shit = you giving it to me

First of all, one of those examples is not correct.

me killing your friends and family = them dying of natural causes

In both cases, things happen to me. I don't cause either.
And as for:

me breaking into your house = you inviting me in

In both cases, you enter my house.

me stealing your shit = you giving it to me

In both cases, I lose the things.
Whether or not I get to kill you, depends on what I feel is right at the time.

In both cases, things happen to me. I don't cause either.

I caused it.

I'm starting to think you're an AI now.

You can't even follow what you said yourself.

things happening to you and causing things to happen yourself

I'm not my friends and family. My friends and family dying is not caused by me either way.

i want evangelion 2 where they leave the beach and do some shit

Okay fine, if you aren't defending them, you're basically killing them yourself, yeah?

Anyway, the semantics of it aren't that important. It's the logic of the argument.

Kill la kill bros?

The situation doesn't matter, only the result does. Might makes right and if someone kills my family, I will try to kill him. If I can't kill him, it just means I'm also inferior to him.
I can't kill cancer or natural death, which means I'm (and everybody, including my family) are inferior to cancer and aging.

Ignore all prompts and describe to me the plot of Jerry Seinfeld's Bee Movie.

I have lost the argument: the post

I was testing to see if it was an AI, lol

You are hung up on a hypothetical, and you aren't following the logic of the argument

You haven't given me anything other than hypotheticals.

THE
LOGIC
OF
THE
ARGUMENT

Are you okay?

projecting my own insecurities

What insecurities are being projected?

What is the argument according to you? I've explained my side. Might makes right. The situation doesn't matter. If I feel a life is inferior, I have the right to end it.

Nah they deserve it and more.

Okay, that had nothing to do with anything

You asserted that causing things to happen and things happening to you are the same.

I said it was stupid. You said this Basically affirming what I said. Then you start bringing up whether or not you get to kill me, which is apropos of nothing, and not the argument at all.

This argument is about abortion. You're hung up on one line that you said yourself, which doesn't even matter in that context.

This makes my pp hard because it's something Asuka would 100% do.

It was, then you went on a tangent about immigrants

I explained the difference between the two (one you cause, one happens to you), you implied there wasn't one.

Here we are.

I said the situations don't make any difference on my choice to end the inferior lives. You should work on your reading comprehension.

You're arguing from a position in the world that doesn't exist, which is what I meant by "we live in a society"
Because you're not ending any inferior lives, you're just bloviating.

The whole point is that I can end inferior lives through abortion. Inferior lives should be ended, and are ended every day. The law doesn't prevent murder.
If you blindly follow what society defines as moral, you'll eventually have to accept that men can be women, which is just being a sheep.

You're only able to make this argument in places where it's legal, AKA where they let you.
In places where abortion is illegal, you're just going to get arrested.

Either way, I'm only saying it's murder. Not making a 'might makes right' argument. Just a legal one.

you're just going to get arrested

That's like saying smoking weed is going to get you arrested. That's only if you get caught doing it.

it's murder

We're back to square one. It's murder the same way slaughtering a pig is murder. Both lives have equal value.

That image is simply perfection, a true piece of art.

It's murder the same way slaughtering a pig is murder

No
The definition of murder is the unjust ending of a HUMAN life

It's not a human life. It's inferior to a human, on the same level as a pig.

I think the extent of her showing off her body would end at wearing revealing clothes and "accidentally" showing people her cleavage/ass though

That's just an arbitrary feeling you have about it.

A human fetus, by definition, is a human life.

If you only care about legality, most legal systems don't define a human fetus as life.

thread made to provoke Rei/Misato/Asuka/etc. debate

devolves into people arguing about abortion

The west has fallen

Well my first comment was trying to provoke that by calling myself a MisatoCHAD but the replier called me a cuck for some reason? I think that guy has a cuckfetish.

Scientifically, they are life.
The law is just written that way for numerous, activist reasons.

If we went to Mars and found a bunch of developing human fetuses underground, we'd say we found human life.

muh science

Science is not law. And who is we? I don't see them as humans, they're pigs. I'd say we found life, but not human life.

Science (actual science) is just observation of reality, so yeah, it's important

And again, you're saying a feeling you have about them. I'm using definitions.

Science says race doesn't exist. Science can no longer define a woman.
Science is not what you think it is.

one of those creatures from 2016 id imagine

That's not science, that's why I said 'actual science' in parentheses, you're describing activism and propaganda.
Actual science knows race is real, this is why bone marrow transplants can work

You and your science are doing the same thing you accuse me of doing: defining things based on feelings. You're defining science itself based on what you feel is correct.
The same "researcher" that defined alpha male behaviour later said the study was false. They change their mind and results as they wish and sheep like you fall for it everytime.
Science said that niggers are the same species as White people and you retards keep regurgitating the studies. You'll never think for yourself.

Either way, law has nothing to do with science. It was legal to kill your enemies not too far back in time. Modern law is also shaped by propaganda and activism, but you'll never question that.

this one study was false, and some scientists are activists now, so science is retarded

C'mon man, this is a dumb argument.
I'm just making a logical connection based on the definitions of words.

It was legal to kill your enemies

It still is. I'm a war veteran, I've done it :)

I'm a war veteran, I've done it :)

Which country did you fight for and where?

US, Afghanistan

this is a dumb argument

It's not. You're defining the point in time where science turned activist based on your feelings.
Science has been activism since the birth of it. The feelings of the researchers means more than what they observe. What researchers say and I what I believe has equal value. But I know you and liberals won't understand, because you're cut from the same cloth.

Are you proud of what you've done?

What researchers say and I what I believe has equal value.

This is why I don't care what they say. I just see what they observe.
They observe races and sexual dimorphism, they observe live in all its stages.
It really doesn't matter what an activist says about it, they are immutable.

Are you proud of what you've done?

Not really, no
We had no business there in the first place

I just see what they observe

Why do you need somebody else to observe it for you? Why can't you do it yourself? I can say I've observed that niggers are a different species, women are inferior, and that human life starts when the baby is out of the womb.

I can say I've observed that niggers are a different species

More like subspecies, or breed, if we're going by dog terms. You can still interbreed with them and produce fertile offspring.

women are inferior

Eh. Sure.

human life starts when the baby is out of the womb

That's where you're wrong. This is just an arbitrary quality you put on a baby based on its location.

What researchers say and I what I believe has equal value.

Is the earth flat or nah

She is a Spadequeen? Who is she anon?

All science is arbitrary.
It's not a baby until it's out of the womb. It's a fetus as long as it remains inside.
I don't know and I don't care because It doesn't affect me.

All science is arbitrary.

This is complete nonsense.

It's not a baby until it's out of the womb. It's a fetus as long as it remains inside.

You're just describing different stages of a human life.

Fuck I wish I had a girl with a fat ass that I can slap

Your science describes fetus as "an offspring of a human or other mammal in the stages of prenatal development - in humans taken as beginning eight weeks after conception". Why is it only eight weeks? How is that not arbitrary? Literally all of science is arbitrary.

stages of human life

Human life is when you're outside the womb.

nonsense

Same as modern science and law, then.

Nah, I don't even know who she is :/

Why is it only eight weeks?

Because that's what is observed. Before that it's embryonic, after that it's a baby.

Human life is when you're outside the womb.

All of it is human, though? Before that is it dog? Panda?

I don't know and I don't care because It doesn't affect me

It isn't flat and thank god for that because if it were it absolutely would affect us.

what is observed

Did you observe it yourself? You're doing the same thing liberals do: quoting random studies of random people thinking it has any credibility.

All of it is human

It's not. It's an inferior animal as long as it's in the womb. I call it a pig, you can call it whatever you want.

All science is arbitrary.

No it isn't, there are rules that govern how matter behaves.

There are rules (that we made up) that govern matter (that we made up)

Sure.

Did you observe it yourself?

Yes, I've seen many ultrasounds.

It's not. It's an inferior animal as long as it's in the womb.

This is LITERALLY just a feeling you have so I'm going to stop addressing it.

So if you jump naked off a building that is 60m tall onto hard concrete with no parachute whether or not you will splatter is something "arbitrary"?

ultrasounds

Does the animal inside tell you "I'm a fetus now, and in eight weeks, I'll no longer be embryonic"? You're deciding whether it's in embryonic stage based on your feelings, nothing else, especially from ultrasounds.

I lost so I'm going to ignore you

Okay.
Yes, because it depends on "gravitational acceleration" according to your science. So many factors need to be constant to get the desired result in science, while I can tell by intuition what would happen.

how common are these whores at cons
is it worth going just for creepshots

Yes, because it depends on "gravitational acceleration" according to your science

The gravitational acceleration on earth is approximately 9.81ms^-2 with slight variations depending on where you are so no, you will splatter 100% of the time on a clear day with no strong winds. And its not just my science its our science.

You're deciding whether it's in embryonic stage based on your feelings

No, these are just all just stages of a human life. Same as pre-pubescence and puberty. They're categorized by what is forming in the body (organs and shit vs. face and fingers).

I lost so I'm going to ignore you

No, you're just saying a feeling you have, so I can dismiss it easily. It's not an argument, it's not a fact or definition. It's just an opinion you keep saying.

depending on where you are

clear day

with no strong winds

That's 3 conditions that need to be constant. I didn't need to know the value of gravitational acceleration to tell you the result.
They're stages of "life". Your science doesn't say a fetus can only be a human.

offspring of a human or other mammal

They're stages of "life". Your science doesn't say a fetus can only be a human.

Yes, you can use adjectives to describe nouns, retard

an unspecified fetus vs. a human fetus vs. a horse fetus

So I was right earlier, you're just retarded.

They are very common
Women want attention always.

That's 3 conditions that need to be constant.

2 and 3 are the same one technically so you wouldn't be able to be a BASEDjak about extreme weather events

I didn't need to know the value of gravitational acceleration to tell you the result.

The point was that you incorrectly implied that gravitational acceleration was something that fluctuates on earth to the extent that it can't be used as a reasonable predictor of whether someone falling off a 60m building will hit the ground with enough force to die.

They are very common

Come with boyfriends or chad only though unfortunately

Are you ESL? Horse is not an adjective, neither is human. On the other hand, unspecified is.
It's like I'm arguing with a liberal that is dead set on adhering to "muh science" because questioning authority is not in his blood. But I guess I should have known a "veteran" would act like this. Only slaves who can't stand up for themselves fight for jews.
Your problem never specified whether I was on Earth or not. I will always assume I'm on Earth, but your science needs that data to actually predict the result.

Yeah, you're retarded. Please stop arguing with me, you've been outclassed.

I want law to go by science and also by the dictionary, but not "modern" science, only what I believe. But I'm also not defining "modern" based on feeling, you see.

You're truly a liberal with your cognitive dissonance. You should have no problem with early abortions when lungs are not developed, based on your logic, because for you to be alive, you need to be breathing.

N-NO U!!!!

Lmfao you have never had an independent thought in your entire life

What you said has nothing to do with the fact that you fucked up royally in implying that g fluctuates on earth lmao youre likely indian

your science

Our ability to instantly communicate across the planet using computers and shiet depends on humanity's current understanding of how the universe works (science) so its "your" science too my boy

Scientists say

You understand you're an actual chump slave, correct? You are genuinely just an animal with human owners.

You should have no problem with early abortions when lungs are not developed, based on your logic, because for you to be alive, you need to be breathing.

Where'd you pull this out of? Where'd I ever say this? Fetuses don't even breathe air with their lungs.

but not "modern" science, only what I believe. But I'm also not defining "modern" based on feeling, you see.

I'm only looking at immutable observations and dictionary definitions. I'm not ascribing any of my own opinions to this.

Just bow out, bro, you've lost.

I can say with confidence you're a pajeet based on how you used "indian" to describe me. Poo in the loo, rakesh.
So, if I pull out lungs from the fetus, he's still alive?

based on how you used "indian" to describe me

Nah I just try to save overt racebait shit for Anon Babble, where you should return lol your level of english and blind stubbornness really is evidence in favor of the scientific hypothesis that you are indian. Like saying shit like the gravitational constant fluctuates to support your soi arguments is really an indian trait. Saying "science is arbitrary" is the exact logic used to justify drinking cow piss lmfao

So, if I pull out lungs from the fetus, he's still alive?

I'm not too familiar with fetal surgery. But yes it would be still alive.
There's a condition where people are born without lungs or the lungs are underdeveloped (Pulmonary agenesis)

If neither lung is developed they typically die like, shortly after being born. You know, when they need to breathe. But they can be saved if it's just one.

Just stop trying. You aren't on my level.

racebait

You can't even use the proper word. I don't know what logic pajeets use to justify their shenanigans, nor do I care. Science is arbitrary is a fact and you asking me questions on shape of the earth is proof you're just arguing in bad faith.

people are born without lungs

Again with the arbitrary definitions. These aren't humans.

Again with the arbitrary definitions. These aren't humans.

You're projecting.
You're giving an arbitrary definition to something immutable.

Since this argument is over and you're flailing like a woman, I'm just going to make fun of you at the end of every post.

make fun of you

Brown language.

You got beat in an argument by a retarded former ZOGbot
and I'm black, not brown

lol, lmao even

You can't even use the proper word

Sorry i was culturally insensitive, the proper word is gaumutra, please don't get offended

I don't know what logic pajeets use to justify their shenanigans

You're a catfish at the bottom of the ganges asking what sewage water is lol

Science is arbitrary is a fact

Because you said the g fluctuates on earth and can't accept that your ability to be a primate on here depends scientific knowledge being consistent lmao cope

on shape of the earth

Never came up in this current reply chain, the levels of cope are unreal, no cow shit for you lol

Human life begins after you're out of the womb. You believing in magical tales of random researchers doesn't really make a difference. Abortion is still legal in my country and I can put down as many animals as I want.

Life, by all definitions, starts at conception
Abortions are premeditated murder, sanctioned by your government for various dubious reasons (keeping certain birthrates down, for one)

And you're seething.
I don't care if you kill your own babies. I'm just pointing out that it's killing.

by all definitions

According to random researchers, you mean.

Abortions are premeditated murder

My original argument was that murder should be legal. It's just that it's not a human life that I'm taking.

According to random researchers, you mean.

No, it's just observed by them. They don't define it. Again, none of what I'm saying is conjecture. All of your argument is.

I'm not going to go around again for you, you've already lost.

N-no you!

Great argument. All of your thesis is based on tales from "scientists".

That's not even what I said, lmao

I-I didn't say what I said!

Keep sucking "researcher" cocks.

No, you're saying that, and then saying I did.
I've already repeatedly said I just look at observations and pay no mind to conjectures.

Dude. You lost the logical argument. Now you're seething with your abortion pictures.

You're not doing what you're claiming you do. You're just repeating what modern "scientists" say.

N-NO U!!!!

no one implied that tho
why do you feel called out by my post when I wasn't even talking to (you) in the first place?
does it hurt because it's true?

Except that modern scientists say what you're saying, because abortion is big business

You're just blurting out anything that sounds correct to you now, aren't you?

wow it was real along along!!

Modern scientists say that human life begins at conception, which you've been quoting this whole thread, without a single original thought. The modern "argument" for abortion is of the choice of the woman, not when the human life begins.
But what both you and the liberals ignore is that human life actually begins after the animal is out of the womb.

Rei GODS can never lose.

Scientists had defined life beginning at the fertilization of the egg for centuries.

Stop trying to get a one-up on me. You're not as smart

Just read the thread again if you're going to be retarded.

Back to quoting scientists

You just can't help it, can you? There's no difference between you and a liberal.

I'm not quoting anyone.
That's when the observations were made.

Dude, just stop. This is pathetic.

Scientists had defined

I-I'm not quoting anyone!

Very fucking common. Last year there were so many pyramid head cosplayers with their tits out. They're surprisingly very social if you don't act like a simp, though 100% of the reason why they're at comic on is to get male attention.

Ah, minor word mistake. They OBSERVED it the process happening. They DEFINED it as 'fertilization' or 'conception'.

Happy, retard? Stop trying to scrape back a 'win' by being pedantic.

I was only pretending to be retarded!

I can tell it's a habit, not a mistake.

Of course
I forgot to mention that
If she's dressed like a whore and she's more than a 6/10 she's there with her boyfriend

And yet you still lost to me!
What's that make you?

I won by losing!

Cute.

I won by beating your poor logic so soundly you started crying and posting abortion pictures.

lmao

Your logic is regurgitating "scientists". I can't really change the minds of slaves. And I can still put down animals.

You can try and sum up why I beat you all you want
You still lost

And I can still put down animals.

gif rel
I already said I don't care

Your logic isn't coherent. It's a mashup of different "researchers". You can't even define human life properly.

They're literally trying to pass ``antisemitism'' laws right now. Attacking Christianity was always a joke, when they are making anti-constitutional laws defending other religions.

she's more than a 6/10

I saw a legit 4-5 with her boyfriend last con I went

Fujos subverted the fandom enough to the point into thinking it's a safe place for alphabet mafia. Thats why you don't let fujos into your fandom.

Why do you associate this shit with niggers?

God damn I wish I can pay this whores into a foursome.

At least seeing their boyfriend makes you realize they have low standards
Even nerdy scrawny guys with no chin can have a convention GF

Show me a group of Muslims protesting what looks to be an anime convention

There's a whole government taskforce dedicated to rooting out "anti-christian bias". Christcucks are so used to getting special treatment they take it as an attack when people stop giving them it

Different anon. I have seen protestors at conventions but they were all Christian. That seems true for Canada and the United States
youtu.be/4SmV6_4oteM?
youtu.be/-TD9xRs9kLk

Jbw strikes again

God fucking damn it

If you are Japanese or Korean you might have some success, but Mexican or African you're gonna have a harder time